Problems

Filters
Clear Filters

298 problems found

2018 Paper 2 Q2
D: 1600.0 B: 1516.0

A function \(\f(x)\) is said to be concave for \(a< x < b\) if \[ \ t\,\f(x_1) +(1-t)\,\f(x_2) \le \f\big(tx_1+ (1-t)x_2\big) \, ,\] for \(a< x_1 < b\,\), \(a< x_2< b\) and \(0\le t \le 1\,\). Illustrate this definition by means of a sketch, showing the chord joining the points \(\big(x_1, \f(x_1)\big) \) and \(\big(x_2, \f(x_2)\big) \), in the case \(x_1 < x_2\) and \(\f(x_1)< \f(x_2)\,\). Explain why a function \(\f(x)\) satisfying \(\f''(x)<0\) for \(a< x < b\) is concave for \(a< x < b\,\).

  1. By choosing \(t\), \(x_1\) and \(x_2\) suitably, show that, if \(\f(x)\) is concave for \(a< x < b\,\), then \[ \f\Big(\frac{u+ v+w}3\Big) \ge \frac{ \f(u) +\f(v) +\f(w)}3 \, ,\] for \(a< u < b\,\), \(a< v < b\,\) and \(a< w < b\,\).
  2. Show that, if \(A\), \(B\) and \(C\) are the angles of a triangle, then \[ \sin A +\sin B + \sin C \le \frac{3\sqrt3}2 \,. \]
  3. By considering \(\ln (\sin x)\), show that, if \(A\), \(B\) and \(C\) are the angles of a triangle, then \[ \sin A \times \sin B \times \sin C \le \frac {3 \sqrt 3} 8 \,. \]


Solution:

TikZ diagram
Consider the function \(g(t) = f(tx_1 + (1-t)x_2) - tf(x_1) - (1-t)f(x_2)\), notice that \(g(0) = g(1) = 0\). Since \(g''(x) < 0\) over the whole interval, we must have two things: 1. \(g'(x)\) is increasing. 2. It \(g'(x) = 0\) can have at most one solution. Therefore \(g'(x)\) is initially \(0\), we have exactly one turning point. Therefore the function is initially decreasing and then increasing, therefore it is always negative and our inequality holds.
  1. \(\,\) \begin{align*} && f \left ( \frac{u+v+w}{3} \right) &= f \left ( \frac{2}{3}\cdot \frac{u+v}2+\frac{1}{3}w \right) \\ &&&\geq \frac23 f \left ( \frac{u+v}{2} \right) + \frac13 f(w) \\ &&&\geq \frac23 \left (\frac12 f(u) + \frac12 f(v) \right) + \frac13 f(w) \\ &&&= \frac{f(u)+f(v)+f(w)}{3} \end{align*}
  2. Notice that if \(A, B, C\) are angles in a triangle then they add to \(\pi\) \(0 < A,B,C < \pi\). We also have \(f(x) = \sin x \Rightarrow f''(x) = - \sin x < 0\) on this interval. Therefore \(\sin A + \sin B + \sin C \leq 3 \sin \frac{A+B+C}{3} = 3 \sin \frac{\pi}{3} = \frac{3\sqrt{3}}2\)
  3. Also notice that \begin{align*} && f(x) &= \ln ( \sin x) \\ \Rightarrow && f'(x) &= \frac{\cos x}{ \sin x} \\ && f''(x) &= -\textrm{cosec}^2 x < 0 \\ \\ \Rightarrow && \ln( \sin A) + \ln (\sin B) + \ln (\sin C) &\leq 3 \ln \left (\sin \left ( \frac{A + B+ C}{3} \right) \right) \\ &&&= 3 \ln \left ( \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \right) = \ln \frac{3\sqrt{3}}{8} \\ \Rightarrow && \sin A \sin B \sin C &\leq \frac{3\sqrt{3}}8 \end{align*}

2018 Paper 2 Q6
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.7

  1. Find all pairs of positive integers \((n,p)\), where \(p\) is a prime number, that satisfy \[ n!+ 5 =p \,. \]
  2. In this part of the question you may use the following two theorems:
    1. For \(n\ge 7\), \(1! \times 3! \times \cdots \times (2n-1)! > (4n)!\,\).
    2. For every positive integer \(n\), there is a prime number between \(2n\) and \(4n\).
    Find all pairs of positive integers \((n,m)\) that satisfy \[ 1! \times 3! \times \cdots \times (2n-1)! = m! \,. \]


Solution:

  1. Let \(n! + 5 = p\). If \(n \geq 5\) then \(5\) divides the LHS and so must also divide the RHS. Since \(n!+5 > 5\) this means the RHS cannot be prime. Therefore consider \(n = 1, 2, 3, 4\). \begin{align*} n = 1: && 1! + 5 = 6 &&\text{ nope} \\ n=2: && 2! + 5 = 7 && \checkmark \\ n=3: && 3! + 5 = 11 && \checkmark \\ n=4: && 4! + 5 = 29 && \checkmark \end{align*} Therefore the solutions are \((2,7), (3,11), (4,29)\).
  2. Suppose \(1! \times 3! \times \cdots \times (2n-1)! = m!\). If \(n \geq 7\) then \(m! > (4n)!\) (by the first theorem) in particular \(m > 4n\). Therefore (by the second theorem) the RHS is divisible by some prime which cannot divide the LHS. Therefore consider \(n = 1,2,3,4,5,6\) \begin{align*} n = 1: && 1! = 1 = 1! && \checkmark \\ n = 2: && 1! \times 3! = 6 = 3! && \checkmark \\ n = 3: && 1! \times 3! \times 5! = 6! && \checkmark \\ n = 4: && 1! \times 3! \times 5! \times 7! = 6! \times 7! = 10! && \checkmark \\ n = 5: && 1! \times 3! \times 5! \times 7! \times 9! = 10! 9! > 11! && \text{would need a factor of } 11\text{ so no} \\ n = 6: && 1! \times 3! \times 5! \times 7! \times 9! \times 11! = 10! 11! 9! > 13! && \text{would need a factor of } 13\text{ so no} \\ \end{align*} Therefore all solutions are \((1,1), (2,3), (3,6), (4,10)\)

2018 Paper 2 Q11
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

The axles of the wheels of a motorbike of mass \(m\) are a distance \(b\) apart. Its centre of mass is a horizontal distance of \(d\) from the front axle, where \(d < b\), and a vertical distance \(h\) above the road, which is horizontal and straight. The engine is connected to the rear wheel. The coefficient of friction between the ground and the rear wheel is \(\mu\), where \(\mu < b/h\), and the front wheel is smooth. You may assume that the sum of the moments of the forces acting on the motorbike about the centre of mass is zero. By taking moments about the centre of mass show that, as the acceleration of the motorbike increases from zero, the rear wheel will slip before the front wheel loses contact with the road if \[ \mu < \frac {b-d}h\,. \tag{*} \] If the inequality \((*)\) holds and the rear wheel does not slip, show that the maximum acceleration is \[ \frac{ \mu dg}{b-\mu h} \,. \] If the inequality \((*)\) does not hold, find the maximum acceleration given that the front wheel remains in contact with the road.


Solution:

TikZ diagram
\begin{align*} % \text{N2}(\uparrow): && R_B+ R_F &= mg \\ \overset{\curvearrowright}{G}: && -R_Fd - F_B h + R_B (b-d) &= 0 \\ \Rightarrow && -d R_F - \mu h R_B +R_B(b-d) &= 0 \\ \Rightarrow && R_B(b-d-\mu h) &= d R_F \\ \underbrace{\Rightarrow}_{R_F > 0 \text{ if not leaving ground}} && R_B(b-d-\mu h) & > 0 \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{b-d}{h} > \mu \end{align*} The acceleration is \(\frac{F_B}{m}\), so we wish to maximize \(F_B\) which is the same as maximising \(R_B\). Since the bike will slip before the front wheel lifts, we want the bike to be on the point of slipping, ie $$ \begin{align*} && R_B(b-d-\mu h) &= d R_F \\ \text{N2}(\uparrow): && R_B + R_F &= mg \\ \Rightarrow && R_B(b-d-\mu h) &= d(mg - R_B) \\ \Rightarrow && R_B(b-\mu h) &= dmg \\ \Rightarrow && R_B &= \frac{dmg}{b-\mu h} \\ \Rightarrow && a &= \frac{F_B}{m} \\ &&&= \frac{\mu R_B}{m} \\ &&&= \frac{\mu dg}{b-\mu h} \\ \end{align*} If the inequality doesn't hold, we want to be at the point just before \(R_F = 0\), since that gives us maximum friction at \(F_B\), ie \begin{align*} && R_B &= mg \\ \Rightarrow && a &= \frac{F_B}{m} \\ &&&= \frac{\mu mg}{m} \\ &&&= \mu g \end{align*}

2018 Paper 3 Q1
D: 1700.0 B: 1484.0

  1. The function \(\f\) is given by \[ \f(\beta)=\beta - \frac 1 \beta - \frac 1 {\beta^2} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\beta\ne0) \,. \] Find the stationary point of the curve \(y=\f(\beta)\,\) and sketch the curve. Sketch also the curve \(y=\g(\beta)\,\), where \[ \g(\beta) = \beta + \frac 3 \beta - \frac 1 {\beta^2} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (\beta\ne0)\,. \]
  2. Let \(u\) and \(v\) be the roots of the equation \[ x^2 +\alpha x +\beta = 0 \,, \] where \(\beta\ne0\,\). Obtain expressions in terms of \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) for \(\displaystyle u+v + \frac 1 {uv}\) and \( \displaystyle \frac 1 u + \frac 1 v + uv\,\).
  3. Given that \(\displaystyle u+v + \frac 1 {uv} = -1\,\), and that \(u\) and \(v\) are real, show that \(\displaystyle \frac 1 u+ \frac 1 v + {uv} \le -1\;\).
  4. Given instead that \(\displaystyle u+v + \frac 1 {uv} = 3 \;\), and that \(u\) and \(v\) are real, find the greatest value of \(\displaystyle \frac 1 u+ \frac 1v + {uv}\,\).


Solution:

  1. \begin{align*} && f(\beta) &= \beta - \frac1{\beta}-\frac1{\beta^2} \\ \Rightarrow && f'(\beta) &= 1 +\frac{1}{\beta^2}+\frac{2}{\beta^3} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= f'(\beta) \\ &&&= 1 + \frac1{\beta^2} + \frac{2}{\beta^3} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= \beta^3 + \beta + 2 \\ &&&= (\beta+1)(\beta^2-\beta+2) \end{align*} Therefore the only stationary point is at \(\beta = -1, f(-1) = -1\)
    TikZ diagram
    \begin{align*} && g(\beta) &= \beta + \frac3{\beta}-\frac1{\beta^2} \\ \Rightarrow && g'(\beta) &= 1 -\frac{3}{\beta^2}+\frac{2}{\beta^3} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= f'(\beta) \\ &&&= 1 - \frac3{\beta^2} + \frac{2}{\beta^3} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= \beta^3 - 3\beta + 2 \\ &&&= (\beta-1)^2(\beta+2) \end{align*} Therefore there are stationary points at \(\beta=1,f(1) = 3, \beta=-2, f(-2) = \frac14\)
    TikZ diagram
  2. Let \(u,v\) be the roots of \(x^2 + \alpha x + \beta = 0\), then since \((x-u)(x-v) = 0\) we must have \(\alpha = -(u+v), \beta = uv\). Therefore: \begin{align*} && u+v +\frac{1}{uv} &= -\alpha + \frac{1}{\beta} \\ && \frac1u+\frac1v + uv &= \frac{u+v}{uv} + uv \\ &&&= -\frac{\alpha}{\beta} + \beta \end{align*} Given \(u+v + \frac 1 {uv} = -1\), ie \(-\alpha + \frac{1}{\beta} = -1\). Since the roots are real, we must also have that \(\alpha^2 - 4\beta \geq 0\), so \begin{align*} && -\alpha + \frac1\beta &= -1 \\ \Rightarrow && \alpha &= 1 +\frac1\beta \\ \Rightarrow && -\frac{\alpha}{\beta}+\beta &= -\frac{1}{\beta} \l1+\frac1{\beta}\r + \beta \\ &&&=\beta - \frac{1}{\beta}-\frac{1}{\beta^2} \end{align*} So we want to maximise \(f(\beta)\) subject to \(\alpha ^2 - 4\beta \geq 0\) \begin{align*} && 0 &\leq \alpha^2 -4 \beta \\ &&&= \l 1 + \frac1{\beta} \r^2 - 4\beta \\ &&&= 1+ \frac2{\beta} + \frac1{\beta^2} - 4\beta \\ \Leftrightarrow && 0 &\leq -4\beta^3+\beta^2 + 2\beta + 1 \\ &&&=-(\beta-1)(4\beta^2+3\beta+1)\\ \Leftrightarrow && \beta &\leq 1 \end{align*} But we know \(f(\beta) \leq -1\) on \((-\infty,1]\) so we're done.
  3. Given that \(-\alpha + \frac{1}{\beta} = 3\) we have \begin{align*} && -\alpha + \frac1\beta &= 3 \\ \Rightarrow && \alpha &= -3 +\frac1\beta \\ \Rightarrow && -\frac{\alpha}{\beta}+\beta &= -\frac{1}{\beta} \l-3+\frac1{\beta}\r + \beta \\ &&&=\beta + \frac{3}{\beta}-\frac{1}{\beta^2} \end{align*} which we want to maximise, subject to: \begin{align*} && 0 &\leq \alpha^2 -4 \beta \\ &&&= \l -3 + \frac1{\beta} \r^2 - 4\beta \\ &&&= 9- \frac6{\beta} + \frac1{\beta^2} - 4\beta \\ \Leftrightarrow && 0 &\leq -4\beta^3+9\beta^2 - 6\beta + 1 \\ &&&=-(\beta-1)^2(4\beta-1)\\ \Leftrightarrow && \beta &\leq \frac14 \end{align*} Therefore the maximum will either be \(f(-2) = \frac14\) or \(f(\frac14) = -\frac{15}4\). Therefore the maximum is \(\frac14\)

2018 Paper 3 Q2
D: 1700.0 B: 1516.0

The sequence of functions \(y_0\), \(y_1\), \(y_2\), \(\ldots\,\) is defined by \(y_0=1\) and, for \(n\ge1\,\), \[ y_n = (-1)^n \frac {1}{z} \, \frac{\d^{n} z}{\d x^n} \,, \] where \(z= \e^{-x^2}\!\).

  1. Show that \(\dfrac{\d y_n}{\hspace{-4.7pt}\d x} = 2x y_n -y_{n+1}\,\) for \(n\ge1\,\).
  2. Prove by induction that, for \(n\ge1\,\), \[ y_{n+1} = 2x y_n -2ny_{n-1} \,. \] Deduce that, for \(n\ge1\,\), \[ y_{n+1}^2 - {y}_n {y}_{n+2} = 2n (y_n^2 - y_{n-1}y_{n+1}) + 2 y_n^2 \,. \]
  3. Hence show that $y_{n}^2 - y^2_{n-1} y^2_{n+1} > 0\( for \)n \ge 1$.


Solution:

  1. \begin{align*} \frac{\d y_n}{\d x} &= \frac{\d}{\d x} \l (-1)^n e^{x^2} \frac{\d^n}{\d x^{n}} \l e^{-x^2}\r \r \\ &= (-1)^n 2xe^{x^2} \frac{\d^n}{\d x^{n}} \l e^{-x^2}\r + (-1)^n e^{x^2} \frac{\d^{n+1}}{\d x^{n+1}} \l e^{-x^2}\r \\ &= 2xy_n - (-1)^{n+1} e^{x^2} \frac{\d^{n+1}}{\d x^{n+1}} \l e^{-x^2}\r \\ &= 2xy_n - y_{n+1} \end{align*}
  2. \(y_0 = 1\), \(y_1 = (-1) e^{x^2} \cdot (-2x) \cdot e^{-x^2} = 2x\), \(y_2 = e^{x^2} \frac{\d^2}{\d x^2} \l e^{-x^2}\r = e^{x^2} \frac{\d }{\d x}\l -2xe^{-x^2} \r = e^{x^2} \l -2e^{-x^2}+4x^2e^{-x^2}\r = 4x^2-2\). Therefore \(2xy_1 - 2y_0 = 2x \cdot 2x - 2\cdot1 = 4x^2-2 = y_2\) so our statement is true for \(n=1\). Assume the statement is true for \(n=k\), then \begin{align*} && y_{k+1} &= 2xy_k - 2ky_{k-1} \\ \frac{\d }{\d x}: && \frac{\d y_{k+1}}{\d x} &= 2\frac{\d}{\d x}\l xy_k \r - 2k\frac{\d y_{k-1}}{\d x} \\ \Rightarrow && 2xy_{k+1}-y_{k+2} &= 2y_k+2x \l 2xy_k-y_{k+1}\r - 2k \l 2xy_{k-1}-y_k \r \\ \Rightarrow && y_{k+2} &=2y_k+ 4x \cdot y_{k+1}-(4x^2+2k)y_k+2x \cdot 2k y_{k-1} \\ &&&= 4x \cdot y_{k+1}-(4x^2+2(k+1))y_k+2x \l2xy_k - y_{k+1} \r \\ &&&= 2x \cdot y_{k+1} -2(k+1)y_k \end{align*} Therefore since our statement is true for \(n=1\) and if it is true for \(n=k\) it is true for \(n=k=1\), therefore by the principle of mathematical induction it is true for all \(n \geq 1\). Since \(2x = \frac{y_{n+1}+2ny_{n-1}}{y_n}\) for all \(n\), we must have \begin{align*} && \frac{y_{n+1}+2ny_{n-1}}{y_n} &= \frac{y_{n+2}+2(n+1)y_{n}}{y_{n+1}} \\ \Leftrightarrow && y_{n+1}^2+2ny_{n-1}y_{n+1} &= y_ny_{n+2}+2ny_n^2+2y_n^2 \\ \Leftrightarrow && y_{n+1}^2-y_ny_{n+2} &= 2n(y_n^2-y_{n-1}y_{n+1})+2y_n^2 \end{align*}
  3. Consider the functions \(f_n(x) = y_{n}^2-y_{n-1}y_{n+1}\) then clearly \(f_{n+1} = 2nf_{n} + 2y_n^2 \geq f_{n}\) so to prove \(f_n(x) > 0\) for \(n \geq 1\) it suffices to prove it for \(n = 1\). But \(f_1 = y_1^2 - y_0y_{2} = (2x)^2-(4x^2-2) = 2 > 0\) so we are done.

2018 Paper 3 Q5
D: 1700.0 B: 1484.0

The real numbers \(a_1\), \(a_2\), \(a_3\), \(\ldots\) are all positive. For each positive integer \(n\), \(A_n\) and \(G_n\) are defined by \[ A_n = \frac{a_1+a_2 + \cdots + a_n}n \ \ \ \ \ \text{and } \ \ \ \ \ G_n = \big( a_1a_2\cdots a_n\big) ^{1/n} \,. \]

  1. Show that, for any given positive integer \(k\), \[ (k+1) ( A_{k+1} - G_{k+1}) \ge k (A_k-G_k) \] if and only if \[\lambda^{k+1}_k -(k+1)\lambda_{{k}} +k \ge 0\,, \] where \( \lambda_{{k}} = \left(\dfrac{a_{k+1}}{G_{k}}\right)^{\frac1 {k+1}}\,\).
  2. Let \[ \f(x)=x^{k+1} -(k+1)x +k \,, \] where \(x > 0\) and \(k\) is a positive integer. Show that \(\f(x)\ge0\) and that \(\f(x)=0\) if and only if \(x = 1\,\).
  3. Deduce that:
    1. \(A_n \ge G_n\) for all \(n\); \\
    2. if \(A_n=G_n\) for some \(n\), then \(a_1=a_2 = \cdots = a_n\,\).


Solution:

  1. \begin{align*} && (k+1) (A_{k+1} - G_{k+1}) & \geq k(A_k - G_k) \\ \Leftrightarrow && \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} a_i - (k+1)G_{k+1} &\geq \sum_{i=1}^k a_i - kG_k \\ \Leftrightarrow && a_{k+1} -(k+1)G_k^{k/(k+1)}a_{k+1}^{1/(k+1)} & \geq - k G_k \\ \Leftrightarrow && a_{k+1} -(k+1)G_k^{k/(k+1)}a_{k+1}^{1/(k+1)} + k G_k& \geq 0\\ \Leftrightarrow && \frac{a_{k+1}}{G_k} -(k+1)G_k^{k/(k+1)-1}a_{k+1}^{1/(k+1)} + k & \geq 0\\ \Leftrightarrow && \lambda_k^{k+1} -(k+1)\lambda_k+ k & \geq 0\\ \end{align*} as required.
  2. \begin{align*} && f'(x) &= (k+1)x^k - (k+1) \\ &&&= (k+1)(x^k-1) \end{align*} Therefore \(f(x)\) is strictly decreasing on \((0,1)\) and strictly increasing on \((1,\infty)\) and so the minimum will be \(f(1) = 1 - (k+1) + k = 0\), so \(f(x) \geq 0\) with equality only at \(x = 1\).
    1. We can proceed by induction to show since the inequality holds for \(n=1\) and since if it holds for \(n=k\) it will hold for \(n=k+1\) as \(A_{k+1}-G_{k+1}\) must have the same sign as \(A_k - G_k\).
    2. The only way for equality to hold is if \(\lambda_k = 1\) for \(k = 1, \cdots n\), ie \(a_{k+1} = G_k\), but this means \(a_2 = a_1, a_3 = a_1\) etc. Therefore all values are equal.

2018 Paper 3 Q7
D: 1700.0 B: 1516.0

  1. Use De Moivre's theorem to show that, if \(\sin\theta\ne0\)\,, then \[ \frac{ \left(\cot \theta + \rm{i}\right)^{2n+1} -\left(\cot \theta - \rm{i}\right)^{2n+1}}{2\rm{i}} = \frac{\sin \left(2n+1\right)\theta} {\sin^{2n+1}\theta} \,, \] for any positive integer \(n\). Deduce that the solutions of the equation \[ \binom{2n+1}{1}x^{n}-\binom{2n+1}{3}x^{n-1} +\cdots + \left(-1\right)^{n}=0 \] are \[x=\cot^{2}\left(\frac{m\pi}{2n+1}\right) \] where \( m=1\), \(2\), \(\ldots\) , \(n\,\).
  2. Hence show that \[ \sum_{m=1}^n \cot^{2}\left(\frac{m\pi}{2n+1}\right) =\frac{n\left(2n-1\right)}{3}. \]
  3. Given that \(0<\sin \theta <\theta <\tan \theta\) for \(0 < \theta < \frac{1}{2}\pi\), show that \[ \cot^{2}\theta<\frac{1}{\theta^{2}}<1+\cot^{2}\theta. \] Hence show that \[ \sum^\infty_{m=1} \frac{1}{m^2}= \frac{\pi^2}{6}\,.\]


Solution:

  1. \begin{align*} \frac{\left(\cot \theta + i\right)^{2n+1} -\left(\cot \theta - i\right)^{2n+1}}{2i} &= \frac{1}{\sin^{2n+1} \theta}\frac{\left(\cos \theta + i \sin \theta \right)^{2n+1} -\left(\cos\theta - i\sin \theta\right)^{2n+1}}{2i} \\ &= \frac{1}{\sin^{2n+1} \theta} \frac{e^{i(2n+1) \theta} - e^{-i(2n+1) \theta} }{2i} \\ &=\frac{\sin (2n+1) \theta}{\sin^{2n+1} \theta} \end{align*} Notice that: \begin{align*} (\cot \theta + i)^{2n+1} - (\cot \theta - i)^{2n+1} &= \sum_{k=0}^{2n+1} \binom{2n+1}{k}(i)^k \cdot \cot^{2n+1-k} \theta - \sum_{k=0}^{2n+1} \binom{2n+1}{k}(-i)^k \cdot \cot^{2n+1-k} \theta \\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{2n+1} \binom{2n+1}{k} \l i^k - (-i)^k \r \cdot \cot^{2n+1-k} \theta \\ &= \sum_{l=0}^{n} \binom{2n+1}{2l+1} \l i^{2l+1} - (-i)^{2l+1} \r \cdot \cot^{2n+1-(2l+1)} \theta \\ &= \sum_{l=0}^{n} \binom{2n+1}{2l+1} 2i \cdot \cot^{2(n-l)} \theta \\ &= 2i\sum_{l=0}^{n} \binom{2n+1}{2l+1} \cot^{2(n-l)} \theta \\ \end{align*} Therefore if \(\theta\) satisfies \(\frac{\sin (2n+1) \theta}{\sin^{2n+1} \theta} = 0\) then \(z = \cot^2 \theta\) satisfies the equation. But \(\theta = \frac{m \pi}{2n+1}, m = 1, 2, \ldots, n\) are \(n\) distinct all the roots must be \(\cot^2 \frac{m \pi}{2n+1}\).
  2. Notice that the sum of the roots will be \(\displaystyle \frac{\binom{2n+1}{3}}{\binom{2n+1}{1}} = \frac{(2n+1)\cdot 2n \cdot (2n-1)}{3! \cdot (2n+1)} = \frac{n \cdot (2n-1)}{3}\) and so \[ \sum_{m=1}^n \cot^{2}\left(\frac{m\pi}{2n+1}\right) =\frac{n\left(2n-1\right)}{3}. \]
  3. For \(0 < \theta < \frac{1}{2}\pi\), \begin{align*} && 0 < \sin \theta < \theta < \tan \theta \\ \Leftrightarrow && 0 < \cot \theta < \frac{1}{\theta} < \frac{1}{\sin \theta} \\ \Leftrightarrow && 0 < \cot^2 \theta < \frac{1}{\theta^2} < \cosec^2 \theta = 1 + \cot^2 \theta\\ \end{align*} Therefore \begin{align*} && \sum_{n=1}^N \cot^2 \frac{n \pi}{2N+1} < \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{(2N+1)^2}{n^2 \pi^2} < N + \sum_{n=1}^N \cot^2 \frac{n \pi}{2N+1} \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{1}{(2N+1)^2} \frac{N(2N-1)}{3} < \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^2 \pi^2} < \frac{1}{(2N+1)^2} \l \frac{N(2N-1)}{3} + 1 \r \\ \Rightarrow && \lim_{N \to \infty}\frac{1}{(2N+1)^2} \frac{N(2N-1)}{3} < \lim_{N \to \infty}\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^2 \pi^2} < \lim_{N \to \infty}\frac{1}{(2N+1)^2} \l \frac{N(2N-1)}{3} + 1 \r \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{1}{6} \leq \lim_{N \to \infty}\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^2 \pi^2} \leq \frac16 \\ \Rightarrow && \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} \end{align*}

2018 Paper 3 Q9
D: 1700.0 B: 1484.0

A particle \(P\) of mass \(m\) is projected with speed \(u_0\) along a smooth horizontal floor directly towards a wall. It collides with a particle \(Q\) of mass \(km\) which is moving directly away from the wall with speed \(v_0\). In the subsequent motion, \(Q\) collides alternately with the wall and with \(P\). The coefficient of restitution between \(Q\) and \(P\) is \(e\), and the coefficient of restitution between \(Q\) and the wall is 1. Let \(u_n\) and \(v_n\) be the velocities of \(P\) and \(Q\), respectively, towards the wall after the \(n\)th collision between \(P\) and \(Q\).

  1. Show that, for \(n\ge2\), \[ (1+k)u_{n} - (1-k)(1+e)u_{n-1} + e(1+k)u_{n-2} =0\,. \tag{\(*\)} \]
  2. You are now given that \(e=\frac12\) and \(k = \frac1{34}\), and that the solution of \((*)\) is of the form \[ \phantom{(n\ge0)} u_n= A\left( \tfrac 7{10}\right)^n + B\left( \tfrac 5{7 }\right)^n \ \ \ \ \ \ (n\ge0) \,, \] where \(A\) and \(B\) are independent of \(n\). Find expressions for \(A\) and \(B\) in terms of \(u_0\) and \(v_0\). Show that, if \(0 < 6u_0 < v_0\), then \(u_n\) will be negative for large \(n\).


Solution:

  1. Just before collision \(n-1\): Velocity of \(P\) is \(u_{n-2}\) Velocity of \(Q\) is \(-v_{n-2}\) \begin{align*} COM: && mu_{n-2}+km(-v_{n-2}) &= mu_{n-1}+kmv_{n-1} \\ \Rightarrow && u_{n-2}-kv_{n-2} &= u_{n-1}+kv_{n-1} \\ NEL: && v_{n-1}-u_{n-1} &= -e((-v_{n-2})-u_{n-2}) \\ \Rightarrow && v_{n-1}-u_{n-1} &= e(v_{n-2}+u_{n-2}) \end{align*} \begin{align*} &&kv_{n-1} &= u_{n-2} - kv_{n-2}-u_{n-1} \\ &&kv_{n-1}&= ku_{n-1}+kev_{n-2}+keu_{n-2} \\ \Rightarrow && kv_{n-2}(1+e) &= u_{n-2}(1-ke)-u_{n-1}(1+k) \\ \Rightarrow && kv_{n-1}(1+e) &= u_{n-1}(1-ke)-u_{n}(1+k) \\ && k(1+e)v_{n-1}-k(1+e)u_{n-1} &= k(1+e)e(v_{n-2}+u_{n-2}) \\ \Rightarrow && u_{n-1}(1-ke)-u_{n}(1+k)-k(1+e)u_{n-1} &= e(u_{n-2}(1-ke)-u_{n-1}(1+k))+k(1+e)eu_{n-2} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= (1+k)u_n + ((ke-1)+k(1+e)-e(1+k))u_{n-1} \\ &&& \quad \quad + (e(1-ke)+k(1+e)e)u_{n-2} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= (1+k)u_n- (1-k)(1+e)u_{n-1} +e(1+k)u_{n-2} \end{align*}
  2. \(u_0 = A + B\) \begin{align*} &&& \begin{cases}u_0 - kv_0 &= kv_1 + u_1 \\ \frac12 (u_0+v_0) &= v_1 - u_1 \\ \end{cases} \\ \Rightarrow && (1+k)u_1 &= u_0 - kv_0 - \frac{k}{2}(u_0 + v_0) \\ \Rightarrow && u_1 &= \frac{1}{k+1} \l u_0 (1-\frac{k}{2}) - \frac32 k v_0 \r \\ &&&= \frac{67}{70} u_0 - \frac{3}{70} v_0 \end{align*} Therefore \(A+B = u_0, \frac{49A+50B}{70} = \frac{67}{70} u_0 - \frac{3}{70} v_0\) \begin{align*} && A+B &= u_0 \\ && 49A+50B &= 67u_0 - 3v_0 \\ \Rightarrow && 50u_0 - A &= 67u_0 - 3v_0 \\ \Rightarrow && A &= -17u_0 + 3v_0 \\ && B &= 18u_0 - 3v_0 \end{align*} If \(0 < 6u_0 < v_0\), then \(B < 0\) and as \(n \to \infty\) we will find that \(\l \frac57 \r^n\) dominates \(\l \frac7{10} \r^n\) and so our velocity will be negative and the particle will change direction

2017 Paper 1 Q2
D: 1484.0 B: 1500.1

  1. The inequality \(\dfrac 1 t \le 1\) holds for \(t\ge1\). By integrating both sides of this inequality over the interval \(1\le t \le x\), show that \[ \ln x \le x-1 \tag{\(*\)} \] for \(x \ge 1\). Show similarly that \((*)\) also holds for \(0 < x \le 1\).
  2. Starting from the inequality \(\dfrac{1}{t^2} \le \dfrac1 t \) for \(t \ge 1\), show that \[ \ln x \ge 1-\frac{1}{x} \tag{\(**\)} \] for \(x > 0\).
  3. Show, by integrating (\(*\)) and (\(**\)), that \[ \frac{2}{ y+1} \le \frac{\ln y}{ y-1} \le \frac{ y+1}{2 y} \] for \( y > 0\) and \( y\ne1\).


Solution:

  1. \(\,\) \begin{align*} (x \geq 1): && \int_1^x \frac{1}{t} \d t &\leq \int_1^x 1 \d t \\ \Rightarrow && \ln x - \ln 1 &\leq x - 1 \\ \Rightarrow && \ln x & \leq x - 1 \\ \\ (0 < x \leq 1):&& \int_x^1 1\d t &\leq \int_x^1 \frac{1}{t} \d t \\ \Rightarrow&& 1- x &\leq \ln 1 - \ln x \\ \Rightarrow&& \ln x &\leq x - 1 \end{align*}
  2. \(\,\) \begin{align*} (x \geq 1): && \int_1^x \frac{1}{t^2} \d t &\leq \int_1^x \frac{1}{t} \d t \\ \Rightarrow && -\frac1x+1 &\leq \ln x - \ln 1 \\ \Rightarrow && 1 - \frac1x &\leq \ln x \\ \\ (0 < x \leq 1): && \int_x^1 \frac{1}{t} \d t &\leq \int_x^1 \frac{1}{t^2} \d t \\ \Rightarrow && \ln 1 - \ln x & \leq -1 + \frac{1}{x} \\ \Rightarrow && 1 - \frac1x &\leq \ln x \\ \end{align*}
  3. \(\,\) \begin{align*} (1 < y): && \int_1^y \left (1 - \frac1{x} \right)\d x &\leq \int_1^y \ln x \d x \\ \Rightarrow && \left [x - \ln x \right]_1^y & \leq \left [ x \ln x - x\right]_1^y \\ \Rightarrow && y - \ln y - 1 &\leq y \ln y - y +1 \\ \Rightarrow && 2y-2 & \leq (y+1) \ln y \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{2}{y+1} & \leq \frac{\ln y}{y-1} \\ (0 < y < 1): && \int_y^1 \left (1 - \frac1{x} \right)\d x &\leq \int_y^1 \ln x \d x \\ \Rightarrow && \left [x - \ln x \right]_y^1 & \leq \left [ x \ln x - x\right]_y^1 \\ \Rightarrow && 1 - (y - \ln y) &\leq -1-(y \ln y-y) \\ \Rightarrow && 2-2y &\leq -(y+1)\ln y \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{2}{y+1} &\leq \frac{-\ln y}{1-y} \tag{\(1-y > 0\)} \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{2}{y+1} &\leq \frac{\ln y}{y-1} \\ \\ (1 < y): && \int_1^y \ln x \d x &\leq \int_1^y (x-1) \d x \\ \Rightarrow && \left [x \ln x -x \right]_1^y &\leq \left[ \frac12 x^2 - x \right]_1^y\\ \Rightarrow && y \ln y - y +1 &\leq \frac12y^2 - y+\frac12 \\ \Rightarrow && y \ln y &\leq \frac12 \left (y^2-1 \right) \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\ln y}{y-1} &\leq \frac{y+1}{2y} \\ \\ (0 < y < 1) && \int_y^1 \ln x \d x &\leq \int_y^1 (x-1) \d x \\ \Rightarrow && \left [x \ln x -x \right]_y^1&\leq \left[ \frac12 x^2 - x \right]_y^1\\ \Rightarrow && -1-(y \ln y - y +1) &\leq-\frac12 - \left ( \frac12y^2 - y\right)\\ \Rightarrow && \frac12 \left (y^2-1 \right) &\leq y \ln y \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\ln y}{y-1} & \leq \frac{y+1}{2y} \tag{\(y-1 < 0\)} \end{align*}

2017 Paper 1 Q4
D: 1500.0 B: 1516.0

  1. Let \(r\) be a real number with \(\vert r \vert<1\) and let \[ S = \sum_{n=0}^\infty r^n\,. \] You may assume without proof that \(S = \displaystyle \frac{1}{1-r}\, \). Let \(p= 1 + r +r^2\). Sketch the graph of the function \(1+r+r^2\) and deduce that \(\frac{3}{4} \le p < 3\,\). Show that, if \(1 < p < 3\), then the value of \( p\) determines \(r\), and hence \(S\), uniquely. Show also that, if \(\frac{3}{4} < p < 1\), then there are two possible values of \(S\) and these values satisfy the equation \((3-p)S^2-3S+1=0\).
  2. Let \(r\) be a real number with \(\vert r \vert<1\) and let \[ T =\sum_{n=1}^\infty nr^{n-1}\,. \] You may assume without proof that \(T = \displaystyle \dfrac{1}{(1-r)^2}\,.\) Let \( q= 1+2r+3r^2\). Find the set of values of \( q\) that determine \(T\) uniquely. Find the set of values of \(q\) for which \(T\) has two possible values. Find also a quadratic equation, with coefficients depending on \( q\), that is satisfied by these two values.


Solution:

  1. \(\,\)
    TikZ diagram
    Notice that \(1+r+r^2\) ranges from \(\frac34\) to \(3\) over \((-1,1)\) therefore \(\frac34 \leq p < 3\) attaining its minimum but not its maximum. If \(p > 1\) we know we must be on the right branch and hence we can determine \(r\) and \(S\) uniquely. If \(\frac34 < p < 1\) then we must have two possible values for \(r\), satisfying \(r_i^2 + r+1 = p\) and so our two possible values for \(S_i = \frac{1}{1-r_i}\) or \(r_i = 1-\frac{1}{S_i}\) and so \begin{align*} && p &= \left ( 1 - \frac{1}{S} \right)^2 + 1 - \frac1S + 1 \\ \Rightarrow && pS^2 &= (S-1)^2 + S^2-S + S^2 \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= (3-p)S^2 -3S + 1 \end{align*}
  2. \(\,\)
    TikZ diagram
    So \(\frac23 \leq q < 6\) and \(r\) and hence \(T\) is uniquely determined if \(2 \leq q < 6\). if \(\frac23

2017 Paper 1 Q6
D: 1516.0 B: 1484.0

In this question, you may assume that, if a continuous function takes both positive and negative values in an interval, then it takes the value \(0\) at some point in that interval.

  1. The function \(\f\) is continuous and \(\f(x)\) is non-zero for some value of \(x\) in the interval \(0\le x \le 1\). Prove by contradiction, or otherwise, that if \[ \int_0^1 \f(x) \d x = 0\,, \] then \(\f(x)\) takes both positive and negative values in the interval \(0\le x\le 1\).
  2. The function \(\g\) is continuous and \[ \int_0^1 \g(x) \, \d x = 1\,, \quad \int_0^1 x\g(x) \, \d x = \alpha\, , \quad \int_0^1 x^2\g(x) \, \d x = \alpha^2\,. \tag{\(*\)} \] Show, by considering \[ \int_0^1 (x - \alpha)^2 \g(x) \, \d x \,, \] that \(\g(x)=0\) for some value of \(x\) in the interval \(0\le x\le 1\). Find a function of the form \(\g(x) = a+bx\) that satisfies the conditions \((*)\) and verify that \(\g(x)=0\) for some value of \(x\) in the interval \(0\le x \le 1\).
  3. The function \(\h\) has a continuous derivative \(\h'\) and \[ \h(0) = 0\,, \quad \h(1) = 1\,, \quad \int_0^1 \h(x) \, \d x = \beta\,, \quad \int_0^1 x \h(x) \, \d x = \tfrac{1}{2}\beta (2 - \beta) \,. \] Use the result in part (ii) to show that \(\h^\prime(x)=0\) for some value of \(x\) in the interval \(0\le x\le 1\).


Solution:

  1. Claim: If \(f(x)\) non-zero for some \(x \in [0,1]\) and \(\int_0^1 f(x) \d x =0\) then \(f\) takes both positive and negative values in the interval \([0,1]\). Proof: Suppose not, then WLOG suppose \(f(x) > 0\) for some \(x \in [0,1]\). Then notice (since \(f\) is continuous) that there is some interval where \(f(x) > 0\) around the \(x\) we have already shown exists. But then \(\int_{\text{interval}} f(x) \d x > 0\) and since \(f(x) \geq 0\) everywhere \(\int_0^1 f(x) \d x > 0\), which is a contradiction.
  2. \(\,\) \begin{align*} && \int_0^1 (x - \alpha)^2 g(x) \d x &= \int_0^1 x^2g(x) \d x - 2 \alpha \int_0^1 x g(x) \d x + \alpha^2 \int_0^1 g(x) \d x \\ &&&= \alpha^2 - 2\alpha \cdot \alpha + \alpha^2 \cdot 1 \\ &&&= 0 \end{align*} Therefore \(g(x)(x-\alpha)^2\) is a continuous function which is either exactly \(0\) (in which case we've already found our \(0\)) or it is a continuous function which is both positive somewhere and has \(0\) integral, and therefore by part (i) must take both positive and negative values (and therefore takes \(0\) in between those points by continuity). \begin{align*} &&1 &= \int_0^1 a+bx \d x \\ &&&= a + \frac12 b \\ && \alpha &= \int_0^1 ax + bx^2 \d x \\ &&&= \frac12 a + \frac13 b \\ && \alpha^2 &= \int_0^1 ax^2 + bx^3 \d x\\ &&&= \frac13 a + \frac14 b \\ \Rightarrow && \frac1{36}(3a+2b)^2 &= \frac1{12}(4a+3b) \\ \Rightarrow && \frac1{36}(3a+2(2-2a))^2 &= \frac1{12}(4a+3(2-2a)) \\ \Rightarrow && (4-a)^2 &= 3(6-2a) \\ \Rightarrow && 16-8a+a^2 &= 18-6a \\ \Rightarrow && a^2-2a-2 &= 0 \\ \Rightarrow && (a-1)^2 - 3 &= 0 \\ \Rightarrow && a &= \pm \sqrt{3}+1 \\ && b &= \mp 2\sqrt{3} \end{align*} So say \(a = \sqrt{3}+1, b = -2\sqrt{3}\) This has a root at \(-\frac{a}{b} = \frac{1+\sqrt{3}}{2\sqrt{3}} = \frac{\sqrt{3}+3}{6} < 1\) so we have met our condition.
  3. Consider \(h'\), we must have \begin{align*} && \int_0^1 h'(x)\d x &= h(1)-h(0) =1\\ && \int_0^1 xh'(x) \d x &= \left [x h(x) \right]_0^1 - \int_0^1 h(x) \d x \\ &&&= 1 - \beta \\ && \int_0^1 x^2 h'(x) \d x &= \left [ x^2h(x) \right]_0^1 - \int_0^1 2xh(x) \d x \\ &&&= 1 - 2\tfrac12 \beta(2-\beta) \\ &&&= (1-\beta)^2 \end{align*} Therefore \(h'\) satisfies the conditions with \(\alpha = 1-\beta\), so \(h'\) must have a root in our interval.

2017 Paper 1 Q8
D: 1500.0 B: 1516.0

Two sequences are defined by \(a_1 = 1\) and \(b_1 = 2\) and, for \(n \ge 1\), \begin{equation*} \begin{split} a_{n+1} & = a_n+ 2b_n \,, \\ b_{n+1} & = 2a_n + 5b_n \,. \end{split} \end{equation*} Prove by induction that, for all \(n \ge 1\), \[ a_n^2+2a_nb_n - b_n^2 = 1 \,. \tag{\(*\)}\]

  1. Let \(c_n = \dfrac{a_n}{b_n}\). Show that \(b_n \ge 2 \times 5^{n-1}\) and use \((*)\) to show that \[ c_n \to \sqrt 2 -1 \text{ as } n\to\infty\,. \]
  2. Show also that \(c_n > \sqrt2 -1\) and hence that \(\dfrac2 {c_n+1} < \sqrt2 < c_n+1\). Deduce that \(\dfrac{140}{99}< \sqrt{2} < \dfrac{99}{70 }\,\).


Solution: Claim \(a_n^2+2a_nb_n - b_n^2 = 1\) for all \(n \geq 1\) Proof: (By induction) Base case: (\(n = 1\)). When \(n = 1\) we have \(a_1^2 + 2a_1 b_1-b_1^2 = 1^2+2\cdot1\cdot2-2^2 = 1\) as required. (Inductive step). Now we assume our result is true for some \(n =k\), ie \(a_k^2+2a_kb_k - b_k^2 = 1\), now consider \(n = k+1\) \begin{align*} && a_{k+1}^2+2a_{k+1}b_{k+1} - b_{k+1}^2 &= (a_k+2b_k)^2+2(a_k+2b_k)(2a_k+5b_k) - (2a_k+5b_k)^2 \\ &&&= a_k^2+4a_kb_k+4b_k^2 +4a_k^2+18a_kb_k+20b_k^2 - 4a_k^2-20a_kb_k-25b_k^2 \\ &&&= (1+4-4)a_k^2+(4+18-20)a_kb_k +(4+20-25)b_k^2 \\ &&&= a_k^2+2a_kb_k -b_k^2 = 1 \end{align*} Therefore since our statement is true for \(n = 1\) and when it is true for \(n=k\) it is true for \(n=k+1\) by the POMI it is true for \(n \geq 1\)

  1. Notice that \(b_{n+1} \geq 5 b_n\) and therefore \(b_n \geq 5^{n-1} b_1 = 2\cdot 5^{n-1}\), so \begin{align*} && 1 &= a_n^2+2a_nb_n - b_n^2\\ \Rightarrow && \frac1{b_n^2} &= c_n^2 + 2c_n - 1 \\ \to && 0 &= c_n^2 + 2c_n - 1 \quad \text{ as } n\to \infty \\ \end{align*} This has roots \(c = -1 \pm \sqrt{2}\), and since \(c_n > 0\) it must tend to the positive value, ie \(c_n \to \sqrt{2}-1\)
  2. Notice that \(c_n^2 + 2c_n - 1 > 0\) so either \(c_n > \sqrt{2}-1\) or \(c_n < -1-\sqrt{2}\), but again, since \(c_n > 0\) we must have \(c_n > \sqrt{2}-1\). Therefore \(\sqrt{2} < c_n + 1\) and \(1+c_n > \sqrt{2} \Rightarrow \frac{1}{1+c_n} < \frac{\sqrt{2}}2 \Rightarrow \frac{2}{1+c_n} < \sqrt{2}\) \begin{array}{c|c|c} n & a_n & b_n \\ \hline 1 & 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 5 & 12 \\ 3 & 29 & 70 \end{array} Therefore \(c_3 = \frac{29}{70}\) and so \(\frac{2}{1 + \frac{29}{70}} = \frac{140}{99} < \sqrt{2} < \frac{29}{70} + 1 = \frac{99}{70}\)

2017 Paper 2 Q4
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

The Schwarz inequality is \[ \left( \int_a^b \f(x)\, \g(x)\,\d x\right)^{\!\!2} \le \left( \int_a^b \big( \f(x)\big)^2 \d x \right) \left( \int_a^b \big( \g(x)\big)^2 \d x \right) . \tag{\(*\)} \]

  1. By setting \( \f(x)=1\) in \((*)\), and choosing \(\g(x)\), \(a\) and \(b\) suitably, show that for \(t> 0\,\), \[ \frac {\e^t -1}{\e^t+1} \le \frac t 2 \,. \]
  2. By setting \( \f(x)= x\) in \((*)\), and choosing \( \g(x)\) suitably, show that \[ \int_0^1\e^{-\frac12 x^2}\d x \ge 12 \big(1-\e^{-\frac14})^2 \,. \]
  3. Use \((*)\) to show that \[ \frac {64}{25\pi} \le \int_0^{\frac12\pi} \!\! {\textstyle \sqrt{\, \sin x\, } } \, \d x \le \sqrt{\frac \pi 2 } \,. \]


Solution:

  1. Let \(f(x) = 1, g(x) = e^x, a = 0, b = t\), so \begin{align*} && \left ( \int_0^t e^x \d x \right)^2 &\leq \left (\int_0^t 1^2 \d x \right) \cdot \left (\int_0^t (e^x)^2 \d x \right) \\ \Rightarrow && (e^t-1)^2 &\leq t \cdot (\frac12e^{2t} - \frac12) \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{e^t-1}{e^t+1} & \leq \frac{t}{2} \end{align*}
  2. Let \(f(x) = x, g(x) = e^{-\frac14 x^2}, a = 0, b = 1\) \begin{align*} && \left ( \int_0^1 xe^{-\frac14 x^2} \d x \right)^2 &\leq \left (\int_0^1 x^2 \d x \right) \cdot \left (\int_0^1 (e^{-\frac14x^2})^2 \d x \right) \\ \Rightarrow && \left ( \left [-2e^{-\frac14x^2} \right]_0^1 \right)^2 & \leq \frac{1}{3} \int_0^1 e^{-\frac12 x^2} \d x \\ \Rightarrow && \int_0^1 e^{-\frac12 x^2} \d x & \geq 12(1-e^{-\frac14})^2 \end{align*}
  3. Let \(f(x) = 1, g(x) = \sqrt{\sin x}, a = 0, b = \tfrac12 \pi\), then \begin{align*} && \left ( \int_0^{\frac12 \pi} \sqrt{\sin x} \d x \right)^2 &\leq \left (\int_0^{\frac12 \pi} 1^2 \d x \right) \cdot \left (\int_0^{\frac12 \pi}|\sin x| \d x \right) \\ &&&= \frac{\pi}{2} \cdot 1 \\ \Rightarrow && \int_0^{\frac12 \pi} \sqrt{\sin x} \d x & \leq \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} \end{align*} Let \(f(x) =(\sin x)^{\frac14}, g(x) = \cos x, a = 0, b = \tfrac12 \pi\), so \begin{align*} && \left ( \int_0^{\frac12 \pi} (\sin x)^{\frac14} \cos x \d x \right)^2 &\leq \left (\int_0^{\frac12 \pi} \cos^2 x \d x \right) \cdot \left (\int_0^{\frac12 \pi}\sqrt{\sin x} \d x \right) \\ \Rightarrow &&\left ( \left [\frac45 (\sin x)^{\frac54} \right]_0^{\frac12 \pi} \right)^2 & \leq \frac{\pi}{4} \int_0^{\frac12 \pi}\sqrt{\sin x} \d x \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{64}{25\pi} &\leq \int_0^{\frac12 \pi}\sqrt{\sin x} \d x \end{align*}

2017 Paper 2 Q6
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.8

Let \[ S_n = \sum_{r=1}^n \frac 1 {\sqrt r \ } \,, \] where \(n\) is a positive integer.

  1. Prove by induction that \[ S_n \le 2\sqrt n -1\, . \]
  2. Show that \((4k+1)\sqrt{k+1} > (4k+3)\sqrt k\,\) for \(k\ge0\,\). Determine the smallest number \(C\) such that \[ S_n \ge 2\sqrt n + \frac 1 {2\sqrt n} -C \,.\]


Solution:

  1. Claim: \(S_n \leq 2\sqrt{n} -1\). Proof: (By induction) (Base case: \(n = 1\)). \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1}} \leq 1 = 2 \cdot \sqrt1 - 1\). Therefore the base case is true. (Inductive step): Suppose our result is true for \(n = k\). Then consider \(n = k+1\). \begin{align*} && \sum_{r=1}^{k+1} \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}} &=\sum_{r=1}^{k} \frac{1}{\sqrt{r}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} \\ &&&\leq 2\sqrt{k} - 1 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{k+1}} \\ &&&= \frac{2 \sqrt{k}\sqrt{k+1}+1}{\sqrt{k+1}} - 1 \\ &&&\underbrace{\leq}_{AM-GM} \frac{(k+k+1)+1}{\sqrt{k+1}} - 1 \\ &&&=\frac{2(k+1)}{\sqrt{k+1}} - 1 \\ &&&= 2\sqrt{k+1}-1 \end{align*} Therefore, since if our statement is true for \(n = k\), it is also true for \(n = k+1\). By the principle of mathematical induction we can say that it is true for all \(n \geq 1, n \in \mathbb{Z}\)
  2. Claim: \((4k+1)\sqrt{k+1} > (4k+3)\sqrt k\,\) for \(k\ge0\,\) Proof: \begin{align*} && (4k+1)\sqrt{k+1} &> (4k+3)\sqrt k \\ \Leftrightarrow && (4k+1)^2(k+1) &> (4k+3)^2k \\ \Leftrightarrow && (16k^2+8k+1)(k+1) &> (16k^2 + 24k+9)k \\ \Leftrightarrow && 16 k^3 + 24 k^2 + 9 k +1&> 16k^3 + 24k^2+9k \end{align*} But this last inequality is clearly true, hence our original inequality is true. Suppose \(S_n \geq 2\sqrt{n} + \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n}} - C\), then adding \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n+1}}\) to both sides we have: \begin{align*} S_{n+1} &\geq 2\sqrt{n} + \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n}} - C + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n+1}} \\ &= 2\sqrt{n+1} + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n+1}} - C + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n+1}} +\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n}} +2(\sqrt{n} - \sqrt{n+1})\\ &= 2\sqrt{n+1} + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n+1}} - C + \frac{1}{2\sqrt{n+1}} +\frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n}} -\frac{2}{\sqrt{n+1} + \sqrt{n}}\\ \end{align*} Therefore as long as the inequality is satisfied for \(n=1\), ie \(1 \geq 2\sqrt{1} + \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{1}} - C = \frac52 - C \Rightarrow C \geq \frac32\)

2017 Paper 2 Q7
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

The functions \(\f\) and \(\g\) are defined, for \(x>0\), by \[ \f(x) = x^x\,, \ \ \ \ \ \g(x) = x^{\f(x)}\,. \]

  1. By taking logarithms, or otherwise, show that \(\f(x) > x\) for \(0 < x < 1\,\). Show further that \(x < \g(x) < \f(x)\) for \(0 < x < 1\,\). Write down the corresponding results for \(x > 1 \,\).
  2. Find the value of \(x\) for which \(\f'(x)=0\,\).
  3. Use the result \(x\ln x \to 0\) as \(x\to 0\) to find \(\lim\limits_{x\to0}\f(x)\), and write down \(\lim\limits_{x\to0}\g(x)\,\).
  4. Show that \( x^{-1}+\, \ln x \ge 1\,\) for \(x>0\). Using this result, or otherwise, show that \(\g'(x) > 0\,\).
Sketch the graphs, for \(x > 0\), of \(y=x\), \(y=\f(x)\) and \(y=\g(x)\) on the same axes.


Solution:

  1. \(\,\) \begin{align*} && \ln f(x) &= x \ln x \\ &&&> \ln x \quad (\text{if } 0 < x < 1)\\ \Rightarrow && f(x) &> x\quad\quad (\text{if } 0 < x < 1)\\ \Rightarrow && x^{f(x)} &< x^x \\ && g(x) &< f(x) \\ && 1&>f(x) \\ \Rightarrow && x &< x^{f(x)} = g(x) \end{align*}
  2. \(\,\) \begin{align*} && f(x) &= e^{x \ln x} \\ \Rightarrow && f'(x) &= (\ln x + 1)e^{x \ln x} \\ \Rightarrow && f'(x) = 0 &\Leftrightarrow x = \frac1e \end{align*}
  3. \(\,\) \begin{align*} && \lim_{x \to 0} f(x) &= \lim_{x \to 0} \exp \left ( x \ln x \right ) \\ &&&= \exp \left ( \lim_{x \to 0} \left ( x \ln x \right )\right) \\ &&&= \exp \left ( 0 \right) = 1\\ \\ && \lim_{x \to 0} g(x) &= \lim_{x \to 0} \exp \left ( f(x) \ln x\right) \\ &&&= \exp \left (\lim_{x \to 0} \ln x f(x)\right) \\ &&&= \exp \left (\lim_{x \to 0} \ln x \lim_{x \to 0}f(x)\right) \\ &&&= \exp \left (\lim_{x \to 0} \ln x\right) \\ &&&= 0 \end{align*}
  4. \(y = x^{-1} + \ln x \Rightarrow y' = -x^{-2} + x^{-1}\) which has roots at \(x =1\), therefore the minimum value is \(1\). (We can see it's a minimum by considering \(x \to 0, x \to \infty\). So \begin{align*} && g'(x) &= x^{f(x)} \cdot (f'(x) \ln x + f(x) x^{-1})\\ &&&= x^{f(x)} \cdot f(x) \cdot ((1+\ln x) \ln x + x^{-1}) \\ &&&= x^{f(x)} \cdot f(x) \cdot (\ln x + x^{-1} + (\ln x)^2) \\ &&&\geq x^{f(x)} \cdot f(x) > 0 \end{align*}
TikZ diagram