Find the limit, as \(n\rightarrow\infty,\) of each of the following. You should explain your reasoning briefly. \begin{alignat*}{4} \mathbf{(i)\ \ } & \dfrac{n}{n+1}, & \qquad & \mathbf{(ii)\ \ } & \dfrac{5n+1}{n^{2}-3n+4}, & \qquad & \mathbf{(iii)\ \ } & \dfrac{\sin n}{n},\\ \\ \mathbf{(iv)\ \ } & \dfrac{\sin(1/n)}{(1/n)}, & & \mathbf{(v)}\ \ & (\arctan n)^{-1}, & & \mathbf{(vi)\ \ } & \dfrac{\sqrt{n+1}-\sqrt{n}}{\sqrt{n+2}-\sqrt{n}}. \end{alignat*}
Solution:
Suppose that \(y\) satisfies the differential equation \[ y=x\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x}-\cosh\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x}\right).\tag{*} \] By differentiating both sides of \((*)\) with respect to \(x\), show that either \[ \frac{\mathrm{d}^{2}y}{\mathrm{d}x^{2}}=0\qquad\mbox{ or }\qquad x-\sinh\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x}\right)=0. \] Find the general solutions of each of these two equations. Determine the solutions of \((*)\).
Solution: \begin{align*} && y & =x\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x}-\cosh\left(\frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x}\right) \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\d y}{\d x} &= \frac{\d y}{\d x} + x\frac{\d ^2 y}{\d x^2} - \sinh \left ( \frac{\d y}{\d x} \right) \frac{\d^2 y}{\d x^2} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= \frac{\d^2 y}{\d x^2} \left ( x - \sinh \left ( \frac{\d y}{\d x}\right)\right) \end{align*} Therefore \(\frac{\d^2y}{\d x^2} = 0\) or \( x - \sinh \left ( \frac{\d y}{\d x}\right) = 0\) as required. \begin{align*} && \frac{\d ^2 y}{\d x^2} &= 0 \\ \Rightarrow && y &= ax + b \\ \\ && 0 &= x - \sinh \left ( \frac{\d y}{\d x}\right) \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\d y}{\d x} &= \sinh^{-1} (x) \\ \Rightarrow && y &= x \sinh^{-1} x - \sqrt{x^2+1} + C \end{align*} Since it is necessary the solution satisfies one of those equations, we just need to check if either of these types of solutions work for our differential equation, ie \begin{align*} && ax + b &\stackrel{?}{=} ax - \cosh(a) \\ \Rightarrow && b &= -\cosh(a) \\ \Rightarrow && y &= ax -\cosh(a) \\ \\ && x \sinh^{-1} x - \sqrt{x^2+1} + C &\stackrel{?}{=} x\sinh^{-1} x - \cosh ( \sinh^{-1} x) \\ &&&= \sinh^{-1} x -\sqrt{x^2+1} \\ \Rightarrow && C &= 0 \end{align*} Therefore the general solutions are, \(y = ax - \cosh(a)\) and \(y = x \sinh^{-1} x - \sqrt{x^2+1}\)
In the figure, the large circle with centre \(O\) has radius \(4\) and the small circle with centre \(P\) has radius \(1\). The small circle rolls around the inside of the larger one. When \(P\) was on the line \(OA\) (before the small circle began to roll), the point \(B\) was in contact with the point \(A\) on the large circle.
\(\lozenge\) is an operation which take polynomials in \(x\) to polynomials in \(x\); that is, given a polynomial \(\mathrm{h}(x)\) there is another polynomial called \(\lozenge\mathrm{h}(x)\). It is given that, if \(\mathrm{f}(x)\) and \(\mathrm{g}(x)\) are any two polynomials in \(x\), the following are always true:
Solution: Claim: If \(f(x) = c\) then \(\lozenge f(x) = 0\) Proof: Consider \(g(x) = x\) then \begin{align*} (1) && \lozenge(f(x)g(x)) &= g(x) \lozenge f(x) + f(x) \lozenge g(x) \\ \Rightarrow && \lozenge(c x) &= x \lozenge f(x) + c \lozenge x \\ (4) && \lozenge(c x) &= c \lozenge x \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= x \lozenge f(x) \\ \Rightarrow && \lozenge f(x) &= 0 \end{align*} \begin{align*} (1) && \lozenge(x^2) &= x \lozenge x + x \lozenge x \\ (3) &&&= 2 x \cdot 1 \\ &&&= 2x \\ \\ (1) && \lozenge (x^3) &= x^2 \lozenge x + x \lozenge (x^2) \\ &&&= x^2 \cdot \underbrace{1}_{(3)} + x \cdot\underbrace{ 2x}_{\text{previous part}} \\ &&&= 3x^2 \end{align*} Claim: \(\lozenge h(x) = \frac{\d }{\d x} ( h(x))\) for any polynomial \(h\). Proof: (By (strong) induction on the degree of \(h\)). Base case: True, we proved this in the first part of the question. Inductive step: Assume true for all polynomials of degree less than or equal to \(k\). Then consider \(n = k+1\). We can write \(h(x) = ax^{k+1} + h_k(x)\) where \(h_k(x)\) is a polynomial of degree less than or equal to \(k\). Then notice: \begin{align*} && \lozenge (h(x)) &= \lozenge (ax^{k+1} + h_k(x)) \\ (2) &&&= \lozenge (ax^{k+1})+ \lozenge (h_k(x)) \\ &&&=\underbrace{a\lozenge (x^{k+1})}_{(4)}+ \underbrace{\frac{\d}{\d x} (h_k(x))}_{\text{inductive hypothesis}}\\ &&&= a \underbrace{\left (x \lozenge x^k + x^k \lozenge x \right)}_{(1)} + \frac{\d}{\d x} (h_k(x)) \\ &&&= a \left ( x \cdot \underbrace{k x^{k-1}}_{\text{inductive hyp.}} + x^k \cdot \underbrace{1}_{(3)} \right) + \frac{\d}{\d x} (h_k(x)) \\ &&&= (k+1)a x^k + \frac{\d}{\d x} (h_k(x)) \\ &&&= \frac{\d }{\d x} \left ( ax^{k+1} + h_k(x) \right) \\ &&&= \frac{\d }{\d x} (h(x)) \end{align*} Therefore since our statement is true for \(n=0\) and if it is true for \(n=k\) it is true for \(n=k+1\) by the principle of mathematical induction it is true for all \(n \geq 0\)
Explain what is meant by the order of an element \(g\) of a group \(G\). The set \(S\) consists of all \(2\times2\) matrices whose determinant is \(1\). Find the inverse of the element \(\mathbf{A}\) of \(S\), where \[ \mathbf{A}=\begin{pmatrix}w & x\\ y & z \end{pmatrix}. \] Show that \(S\) is a group under matrix multiplication (you may assume that matrix multiplication is associative). For which elements \(\mathbf{A}\) is \(\mathbf{A}^{-1}=\mathbf{A}\)? Which element or elements have order 2? Show that the element \(\mathbf{A}\) of \(S\) has order 3 if, and only if, \(w+z+1=0.\) Write down one such element.
Solution: The order of an element \(g\) is the smallest positive number \(k\) such that \(g^k = e\). $\mathbf{A}^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}z & -x\\ -y & w \end{pmatrix}$. Claim, \(S\) is a group. \begin{enumerate} \item (Closure) The product of two \(2\times2\) matrices is always a \(2\times 2\) matrix so we only need to check the determinant. Suppose \(\det(\mathbf{A}) = \det (\mathbf{B}) = 1\), then \(\det(AB) = \det(A)\det(B) = 1\), so our operation is closed \item (Associativity) Inherited from matrix multiplication \item (Identity) $\mathbf{I} =\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\( has determinant \)1$. \item (Inverses) The inverse is always fine since the matrix of cofactors always contains integers and the determinant is one, so we never end up with anything which isn't an integer. \end{itemize} If \(\mathbf{A}^-1 = \mathbf{A}\) then assuming $\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}a & b\\ c & d \end{pmatrix}\( then \)\mathbf{A}^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}d & - b\\ -c & a \end{pmatrix}\( so we must have \)a=d, -b=b, -c=c\(, so \)b = c = 0\( and \)a = d\(. For the determinant to be \)1\( we must have \)ad = a^2 = 1\(, ie \)a = \pm 1\(. Therefore we must have \)\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\( or \)\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}-1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$. For an element to have order \(2\) then \(\mathbf{A}^2 = \mathbf{I}\) ie, \(\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A}^{-1}\) and \(\mathbf{A} \neq \mathbf{I}\) therefore the only element of order \(2\) is $\begin{pmatrix}-1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$. For an element to have order \(3\) we must have \(\mathbf{A}^2 = \mathbf{A}^{-1}\), ie $\begin{pmatrix}w^2 + xy & x(w+z)\\ y(w+z) & z^2 + xy \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}z & -x\\ -y & w \end{pmatrix}$. Therefore \(w^2 + xy = z, x(w+z) = -x, y(w+z) = -y, z^2+xy = w\). The second and third equations are satisfied iff \(w+z+1 = 0\) or \(x = 0\) and \(y = 0\), but if \(x = 0\) and \(y = 0\) then we aren't order \(3\), so we just need to check this is sufficient for the first and last equations. Since \(\det(\mathbf{A}) = 1\) we have \(wz =xy +1\), so the first and last equations are equivalent to \(w^2 + wz - 1 = z\) and \(x^2 + wz-1 = w\) which are equivalent to \(w(w+z) = z+1\) or \(w + z+ 1 = 0\) as required
Sketch the graphs of \(y=\sec x\) and \(y=\ln(2\sec x)\) for \(0\leqslant x\leqslant\frac{1}{2}\pi\). Show graphically that the equation \[ kx=\ln(2\sec x) \] has no solution with \(0\leqslant x<\frac{1}{2}\pi\) if \(k\) is a small positive number but two solutions if \(k\) is large. Explain why there is a number \(k_{0}\) such that \[ k_{0}x=\ln(2\sec x) \] has exactly one solution with \(0\leqslant x<\frac{1}{2}\pi\). Let \(x_{0}\) be this solution, so that \(0\leqslant x_{0}<\frac{1}{2}\pi\) and \(k_{0}x_{0}=\ln(2\sec x_0)\). Show that \[ x_{0}=\cot x_{0}\ln(2\sec x_{0}). \] Use any appropriate method to find \(x_{0}\) correct to two decimal places. Hence find an approximate value for \(k_{0}\).
Solution:
The cubic equation \[ x^{3}-px^{2}+qx-r=0 \] has roots \(a,b\) and \(c\). Express \(p,q\) and \(r\) in terms of \(a,b\) and \(c\).
Solution: \(p = a+b+c, q = ab+bc+ca, r = abc\)
Calculate the following integrals
Solution:
Let \(\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\) and \(\mathbf{c}\) be the position vectors of points \(A,B\) and \(C\) in three-dimensional space. Suppose that \(A,B,C\) and the origin \(O\) are not all in the same plane. Describe the locus of the point whose position vector \(\mathbf{r}\) is given by \[ \mathbf{r}=(1-\lambda-\mu)\mathbf{a}+\lambda\mathbf{b}+\mu\mathbf{c}, \] where \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) are scalar parameters. By writing this equation in the form \(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{n}=p\) for a suitable vector \(\mathbf{n}\) and scalar \(p\), show that \[ -(\lambda+\mu)\mathbf{a}\cdot(\mathbf{b}\times\mathbf{c})+\lambda\mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{c}\times\mathbf{a})+\mu\mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{a}\times\mathbf{b})=0 \] for all scalars \(\lambda,\mu.\) Deduce that \[ \mathbf{a}\cdot(\mathbf{b}\times\mathbf{c})=\mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{c}\times\mathbf{a})=\mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{a}\times\mathbf{b}). \] Say briefly what happens if \(A,B,C\) and \(O\) are all in the same plane.
Solution: \(\mathbf{r}=(1-\lambda-\mu)\mathbf{a}+\lambda\mathbf{b}+\mu\mathbf{c} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda(\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{a})+\mu(\mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a})\) Therefore it is the plane through \(\mathbf{a}\) with direction vectors \(\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{a}\) and \(\mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a}\), ie it is the plane through \(\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c}\). The normal to this plane will be \((\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{a} ) \times (\mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a}\), so we must have: \begin{align*} && \mathbf{r} \cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) &= \mathbf{a} \cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) \\ &&&= \mathbf{a} \cdot (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}) \end{align*} Therefore, \begin{align*} && \mathbf{a} \cdot (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}) &= \mathbf{r} \cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) \\ &&&= \left ( (1-\lambda-\mu)\mathbf{a}+\lambda\mathbf{b}+\mu\mathbf{c} \right)\cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) \\ &&&= (1-\lambda- \mu) \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c})-\lambda \mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c})-\mu \mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{a}) \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= (-\lambda- \mu) \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c})-\lambda \mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c})-\mu \mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{a}) \\ &&&= -(\lambda+ \mu) \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c})+\lambda \mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{c} \times \mathbf{a})+\mu \mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}) \\ \end{align*} The result follows from setting \(\mu = 0, \lambda = 1\) and \(\mu = 1, \lambda = 0\). If they all lie in the same plane then the plane described is through the origin, and those values are all the same, but equal to \(0\).
Let \(\alpha\) be a fixed angle, \(0 < \alpha \leqslant\frac{1}{2}\pi.\) In each of the following cases, sketch the locus of \(z\) in the Argand diagram (the complex plane):
Solution: