Problems

Filters
Clear Filters
1992 Paper 2 Q5
D: 1577.1 B: 1470.1

Explain what is meant by the order of an element \(g\) of a group \(G\). The set \(S\) consists of all \(2\times2\) matrices whose determinant is \(1\). Find the inverse of the element \(\mathbf{A}\) of \(S\), where \[ \mathbf{A}=\begin{pmatrix}w & x\\ y & z \end{pmatrix}. \] Show that \(S\) is a group under matrix multiplication (you may assume that matrix multiplication is associative). For which elements \(\mathbf{A}\) is \(\mathbf{A}^{-1}=\mathbf{A}\)? Which element or elements have order 2? Show that the element \(\mathbf{A}\) of \(S\) has order 3 if, and only if, \(w+z+1=0.\) Write down one such element.


Solution: The order of an element \(g\) is the smallest positive number \(k\) such that \(g^k = e\). $\mathbf{A}^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}z & -x\\ -y & w \end{pmatrix}$. Claim, \(S\) is a group. \begin{enumerate} \item (Closure) The product of two \(2\times2\) matrices is always a \(2\times 2\) matrix so we only need to check the determinant. Suppose \(\det(\mathbf{A}) = \det (\mathbf{B}) = 1\), then \(\det(AB) = \det(A)\det(B) = 1\), so our operation is closed \item (Associativity) Inherited from matrix multiplication \item (Identity) $\mathbf{I} =\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\( has determinant \)1$. \item (Inverses) The inverse is always fine since the matrix of cofactors always contains integers and the determinant is one, so we never end up with anything which isn't an integer. \end{itemize} If \(\mathbf{A}^-1 = \mathbf{A}\) then assuming $\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}a & b\\ c & d \end{pmatrix}\( then \)\mathbf{A}^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}d & - b\\ -c & a \end{pmatrix}\( so we must have \)a=d, -b=b, -c=c\(, so \)b = c = 0\( and \)a = d\(. For the determinant to be \)1\( we must have \)ad = a^2 = 1\(, ie \)a = \pm 1\(. Therefore we must have \)\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}\( or \)\mathbf{A} = \begin{pmatrix}-1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$. For an element to have order \(2\) then \(\mathbf{A}^2 = \mathbf{I}\) ie, \(\mathbf{A} = \mathbf{A}^{-1}\) and \(\mathbf{A} \neq \mathbf{I}\) therefore the only element of order \(2\) is $\begin{pmatrix}-1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$. For an element to have order \(3\) we must have \(\mathbf{A}^2 = \mathbf{A}^{-1}\), ie $\begin{pmatrix}w^2 + xy & x(w+z)\\ y(w+z) & z^2 + xy \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}z & -x\\ -y & w \end{pmatrix}$. Therefore \(w^2 + xy = z, x(w+z) = -x, y(w+z) = -y, z^2+xy = w\). The second and third equations are satisfied iff \(w+z+1 = 0\) or \(x = 0\) and \(y = 0\), but if \(x = 0\) and \(y = 0\) then we aren't order \(3\), so we just need to check this is sufficient for the first and last equations. Since \(\det(\mathbf{A}) = 1\) we have \(wz =xy +1\), so the first and last equations are equivalent to \(w^2 + wz - 1 = z\) and \(x^2 + wz-1 = w\) which are equivalent to \(w(w+z) = z+1\) or \(w + z+ 1 = 0\) as required

1992 Paper 2 Q6
D: 1600.0 B: 1485.5

Sketch the graphs of \(y=\sec x\) and \(y=\ln(2\sec x)\) for \(0\leqslant x\leqslant\frac{1}{2}\pi\). Show graphically that the equation \[ kx=\ln(2\sec x) \] has no solution with \(0\leqslant x<\frac{1}{2}\pi\) if \(k\) is a small positive number but two solutions if \(k\) is large. Explain why there is a number \(k_{0}\) such that \[ k_{0}x=\ln(2\sec x) \] has exactly one solution with \(0\leqslant x<\frac{1}{2}\pi\). Let \(x_{0}\) be this solution, so that \(0\leqslant x_{0}<\frac{1}{2}\pi\) and \(k_{0}x_{0}=\ln(2\sec x_0)\). Show that \[ x_{0}=\cot x_{0}\ln(2\sec x_{0}). \] Use any appropriate method to find \(x_{0}\) correct to two decimal places. Hence find an approximate value for \(k_{0}\).


Solution:

TikZ diagram
The red line is \(y = \ln (2 \sec x)\), blue is \(y = \sec x\). We can see that if the gradient is too small it never touches the red line. If it is large it will cross the red line twice in that interval. For some value it will be perfectly tangent. Since the line is tangent we must have \begin{align*} && y &= \ln (2 \sec x) \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\d y}{ \d x} &= \frac{1}{2 \sec x} \cdot 2\sec x \tan x \\ &&&= \tan x \\ \Rightarrow && k_0 &=\tan x_0 \\ \Rightarrow && k_0 x_0 &= \ln(2 \sec x_0 ) \\ \Rightarrow && x_0 &= \cot x_0 \ln (2 \sec x_0) \end{align*} If \(f(x) =x- \cot x \ln (2 \sec x)\), then \(f'(x) =1 - 1+\ln(2\sec x) \cosec^2x = \ln(2 \sec x)\cosec^2x \) so we should look at \begin{align*} x_{n+1} &= x_n - \frac{f(x_n)}{f'(x_n)} \\ &= x_n - \frac{x_n- \cot x_n \ln (2 \sec x_n)}{\ln(2 \sec x_n)\cosec^2x_n } \\ &= x_n \left (1 - \frac{\sin^2 x_n}{\ln (2 \sec x_n)}\right) +\sin x_n \cos x_n \end{align*} \begin{array}{c|c} n & x_n \\ \hline 1 & \frac{\pi}{4} \\ 2 & 0.907701\ldots \\ 3 & 0.91439340\ldots \\ 4 & 0.914403867\ldots \\ 5 & 0.91440386\ldots \\ 6 & 0.91440386\ldots \\ \end{array} The sign change test shows that \(x_0 \approx 0.91\) and \(k_0 = \tan(x_0) \approx 1.30\)

1992 Paper 2 Q7
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

The cubic equation \[ x^{3}-px^{2}+qx-r=0 \] has roots \(a,b\) and \(c\). Express \(p,q\) and \(r\) in terms of \(a,b\) and \(c\).

  1. If \(p=0\) and two of the roots are equal to each other, show that \[ 4q^{3}+27r^{2}=0. \]
  2. Show that, if two of the roots of the original equation are equal to each other, then \[ 4\left(q-\frac{p^{2}}{3}\right)^{3}+27\left(\frac{2p^{3}}{27}-\frac{pq}{3}+r\right)^{2}=0. \]


Solution: \(p = a+b+c, q = ab+bc+ca, r = abc\)

  1. Suppose two roots are equal to each other, this means that one of the roots is also a root of the derivative. ie \begin{align*} && 0 &= x^3+qx - r \\ && 0 &= 3x^2+q \end{align*} have a common root, but this root must satisfy \(x^2 = -\frac{q}{3}\). Then \begin{align*} &&0 &= x^3 + qx - r \\ &&&= x^3 -3x^3 - r \\ &&&= -2x^3 -r \\ \Rightarrow && r^2 &= 4x^6 \\ &&&= 4 \left ( -\frac{q}{3}\right)^3 \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= 27r^2+4q^3 \end{align*}
  2. Consider \(x = z + \frac{p}{3}\), then the equation is: \begin{align*} x^{3}-px^{2}+qx-r &= (z + \frac{p}{3})^3 - p(z + \frac{p}{3})^2 + q(z + \frac{p}{3}) - r \\ &= z^3 + pz^2 + \frac{p^2}{3}z + \frac{p^3}{27} - \\ &\quad -pz^2-\frac{2p^2}{3}z-\frac{p^3}{9} + \\ &\quad\quad qz + \frac{pq}{3} - r \\ &= z^3+\left (\frac{p^2}{3}-\frac{2p^2}{3}+q \right)z + \left (\frac{p^3}{27}-\frac{p^3}{9}+\frac{pq}{3}-r \right) \\ &= z^3+\left (-\frac{p^2}{3}+q \right)z + \left (-\frac{2p^3}{27}+\frac{pq}{3}-r \right) \\ \end{align*} Since this equation must also have repeated roots we must have: \begin{align*} 4\left (-\frac{p^2}{3}+q \right)^3 + 27 \left (-\frac{2p^3}{27}+\frac{pq}{3}-r \right)^2 = 0 \end{align*} which is exactly our desired result

1992 Paper 2 Q8
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.0

Calculate the following integrals

  1. \({\displaystyle \int\frac{x}{(x-1)(x^{2}-1)}\,\mathrm{d}x}\);
  2. \({\displaystyle \int\frac{1}{3\cos x+4\sin x}\,\mathrm{d}x}\);
  3. \({\displaystyle \int\frac{1}{\sinh x}\,\mathrm{d}x}.\)


Solution:

  1. \begin{align*} \int\frac{x}{(x-1)(x^{2}-1)}\,\mathrm{d}x &= \int \frac{x}{(x-1)^2 (x+1)} \d x \\ &= \int \frac{1}{2(x-1)^2} + \frac{1}{4(x-1)} - \frac{1}{4(x+1)} \d x \\ &= -\frac12 (x-1)^{-1} + \frac14 \ln(x-1) - \frac14 \ln (x+1) + C \end{align*}
  2. \begin{align*} \int \frac{1}{3 \cos x + 4 \sin x } \d x &= \int \frac{1}{5 \cos (x - \cos^{-1}(3/5))} \d x \\ &= \frac15 \int \sec (x - \cos^{-1}(3/5)) \d x\\ &= \frac15 \left (\ln | \sec (x - \cos^{-1}(3/5)) + \tan (x - \cos^{-1}(3/5)) | \right) + C \end{align*}
  3. \begin{align*} \int \frac{1}{\sinh x} \d x &= \int \frac{2}{e^x - e^{-x}} \\ &= \int \frac{2e^x}{e^{2x}-1} \d x \\ &=\int \frac{e^x}{e^x-1} - \frac{e^x}{e^x+1} \d x \\ &= \ln (e^x - 1) + \ln (e^x+1) + C \end{align*}

1992 Paper 2 Q9
D: 1600.0 B: 1515.9

Let \(\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b}\) and \(\mathbf{c}\) be the position vectors of points \(A,B\) and \(C\) in three-dimensional space. Suppose that \(A,B,C\) and the origin \(O\) are not all in the same plane. Describe the locus of the point whose position vector \(\mathbf{r}\) is given by \[ \mathbf{r}=(1-\lambda-\mu)\mathbf{a}+\lambda\mathbf{b}+\mu\mathbf{c}, \] where \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) are scalar parameters. By writing this equation in the form \(\mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{n}=p\) for a suitable vector \(\mathbf{n}\) and scalar \(p\), show that \[ -(\lambda+\mu)\mathbf{a}\cdot(\mathbf{b}\times\mathbf{c})+\lambda\mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{c}\times\mathbf{a})+\mu\mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{a}\times\mathbf{b})=0 \] for all scalars \(\lambda,\mu.\) Deduce that \[ \mathbf{a}\cdot(\mathbf{b}\times\mathbf{c})=\mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{c}\times\mathbf{a})=\mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{a}\times\mathbf{b}). \] Say briefly what happens if \(A,B,C\) and \(O\) are all in the same plane.


Solution: \(\mathbf{r}=(1-\lambda-\mu)\mathbf{a}+\lambda\mathbf{b}+\mu\mathbf{c} = \mathbf{a} + \lambda(\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{a})+\mu(\mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a})\) Therefore it is the plane through \(\mathbf{a}\) with direction vectors \(\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{a}\) and \(\mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a}\), ie it is the plane through \(\mathbf{a},\mathbf{b},\mathbf{c}\). The normal to this plane will be \((\mathbf{b}-\mathbf{a} ) \times (\mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a}) = \mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a}\), so we must have: \begin{align*} && \mathbf{r} \cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) &= \mathbf{a} \cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) \\ &&&= \mathbf{a} \cdot (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}) \end{align*} Therefore, \begin{align*} && \mathbf{a} \cdot (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}) &= \mathbf{r} \cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) \\ &&&= \left ( (1-\lambda-\mu)\mathbf{a}+\lambda\mathbf{b}+\mu\mathbf{c} \right)\cdot \left (\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c}-\mathbf{b}\times \mathbf{a} \right) \\ &&&= (1-\lambda- \mu) \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c})-\lambda \mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c})-\mu \mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{a}) \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= (-\lambda- \mu) \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c})-\lambda \mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{c})-\mu \mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{a}) \\ &&&= -(\lambda+ \mu) \mathbf{a}\cdot (\mathbf{b} \times \mathbf{c})+\lambda \mathbf{b}\cdot(\mathbf{c} \times \mathbf{a})+\mu \mathbf{c}\cdot(\mathbf{a} \times \mathbf{b}) \\ \end{align*} The result follows from setting \(\mu = 0, \lambda = 1\) and \(\mu = 1, \lambda = 0\). If they all lie in the same plane then the plane described is through the origin, and those values are all the same, but equal to \(0\).

1992 Paper 2 Q10
D: 1600.0 B: 1529.8

Let \(\alpha\) be a fixed angle, \(0 < \alpha \leqslant\frac{1}{2}\pi.\) In each of the following cases, sketch the locus of \(z\) in the Argand diagram (the complex plane):

  1. \({\displaystyle \arg\left(\frac{z-1}{z}\right)=\alpha,}\)
  2. \({\displaystyle \arg\left(\frac{z-1}{z}\right)=\alpha-\pi,}\)
  3. \(|\dfrac{z-1}{z}|=1.\)
Let \(z_{1},z_{2},z_{3}\) and \(z_{4}\) be four points lying (in that order) on a circle in the Argand diagram. If \[ w=\frac{(z_{1}-z_{2})(z_{3}-z_{4})}{(z_{4}-z_{1})(z_{2}-z_{3})} \] show, by considering \(\arg w\), that \(w\) is real.


Solution:

TikZ diagram
TikZ diagram
TikZ diagram
TikZ diagram
\begin{align*} \arg w &= \arg \frac{(z_{1}-z_{2})(z_{3}-z_{4})}{(z_{4}-z_{1})(z_{2}-z_{3})} \\ &= \arg \frac{(z_{1}-z_{2})(z_{3}-z_{4})}{(z_{2}-z_{3})(z_{4}-z_{1})} \\ &= \arg \frac{(z_{1}-z_{2})}{(z_{3}-z_{2})}\frac{(z_{3}-z_{4})}{(z_{1}-z_{4})} \\ &= \arg \frac{(z_{1}-z_{2})}{(z_{3}-z_{2})} + \arg \frac{(z_{3}-z_{4})}{(z_{1}-z_{4})}\\ &= \beta + \pi - \beta = \pi \end{align*} Therefore \(w\) is real

1992 Paper 2 Q11
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

I am standing next to an ice-cream van at a distance \(d\) from the top of a vertical cliff of height \(h\). It is not safe for me to go any nearer to the top of the cliff. My niece Padma is on the broad level beach at the foot of the cliff. I have just discovered that I have left my wallet with her, so I cannot buy her an ice-cream unless she can throw the wallet up to me. She can throw it at speed \(V\), at any angle she chooses and from anywhere on the beach. Air resistance is negligible; so is Padma's height compared to that of the cliff. Show that she can throw the wallet to me if and only if \[ V^{2}\geqslant g(2h+d). \]


Solution:

TikZ diagram
Rather than considering Padma's throw, imagine a throw in reverse from me. As we can see from the diagram, it will need to pass through \((0,0)\) to have minimal speed when it hits the ground, so possible throws are: \begin{align*} && 0 &= u \sin \alpha t - \frac12 g t^2 \\ \Rightarrow && T &= \frac{2u \sin \alpha}{g} \\ && d &= u \cos \alpha T \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{d}{u \cos \alpha} &= \frac{2u \sin \alpha}{g} \\ \Rightarrow && dg &= u^2 \sin 2 \alpha \\ && v^2 &= u^2 + 2as \\ \Rightarrow && V_y^2 &= u^2 \sin^2 \alpha + 2gh \\ \Rightarrow && V^2 &= u^2 \sin^2 \alpha + 2gh + u^2 \cos^2 \theta \\ &&&= u^2 + 2gh \\ &&&= 2gh + \frac{dg}{\sin 2 \alpha} \geq 2gh +dg = g(2h+d) \end{align*}

1992 Paper 2 Q12
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

In the figure, \(W_{1}\) and \(W_{2}\) are wheels, both of radius \(r\). Their centres \(C_{1}\) and \(C_{2}\) are fixed at the same height, a distance \(d\) apart, and each wheel is free to rotate, without friction, about its centre. Both wheels are in the same vertical plane. Particles of mass \(m\) are suspended from \(W_{1}\) and \(W_{2}\) as shown, by light inextensible strings would round the wheels. A light elastic string of natural length \(d\) and modulus elasticity \(\lambda\) is fixed to the rims of the wheels at the points \(P_{1}\) and \(P_{2}.\) The lines joining \(C_{1}\) to \(P_{1}\) and \(C_{2}\) to \(P_{2}\) both make an angle \(\theta\) with the vertical. The system is in equilibrium. \noindent

\psset{xunit=1.0cm,yunit=1.0cm,algebraic=true,dimen=middle,dotstyle=o,dotsize=3pt 0,linewidth=0.5pt,arrowsize=3pt 2,arrowinset=0.25} \begin{pspicture*}(-4.94,-1.8)(5.1,3.96) \psline(-4,1)(4,1) \pscircle(-3,2){1.41} \pscircle(3,2){1.41} \psline(-3,2)(-4,1) \psline(-3,2)(-3,0.59) \psline(3,2)(4,1) \psline(3,2)(3,0.59) \psline(1.59,1.98)(1.58,-1) \psline(-1.59,1.96)(-1.6,-1.06) \parametricplot{-2.356194490192345}{-1.5707963267948966}{0.4*cos(t)+-3|0.4*sin(t)+2} \parametricplot{-1.5707963267948966}{-0.7853981633974483}{0.4*cos(t)+3|0.4*sin(t)+2} \rput[tl](-2.88,2.24){\(C_1\)} \rput[tl](3.22,2.24){\(C_2\)} \rput[tl](-4.58,1.04){\(P_1\)} \rput[tl](4.32,1.02){\(P_2\)} \rput[tl](-1.7,-1.36){\(m\)} \rput[tl](1.44,-1.4){\(m\)} \rput[tl](-3.24,3.88){\(W_1\)} \rput[tl](2.76,3.86){\(W_2\)} \rput[tl](-3.42,1.5){\(\theta\)} \rput[tl](3.14,1.52){\(\theta\)} \begin{scriptsize} \psdots[dotstyle=*](-4,1) \psdots[dotstyle=*](4,1) \psdots[dotstyle=*](1.58,-1) \psdots[dotstyle=*](-1.6,-1.06) \end{scriptsize} \end{pspicture*} \par
\vspace{-0.5cm} Show that \[ \sin2\theta=\frac{mgd}{\lambda r}. \]For what value or values of \(\lambda\) (in terms of \(m,d,r\) and \(g\)) are there
  • sep}{3mm}
  • [\bf (i)] no equilibrium positions,
  • [\bf (ii)] just one equilibrium position,
  • [\bf (iii)] exactly two equilibrium positions,
  • [\bf (iv)] more than two equilibrium positions?

1992 Paper 2 Q13
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.0

Two particles \(P_{1}\) and \(P_{2}\), each of mass \(m\), are joined by a light smooth inextensible string of length \(\ell.\) \(P_{1}\) lies on a table top a distance \(d\) from the edge, and \(P_{2}\) hangs over the edge of the table and is suspended a distance \(b\) above the ground. The coefficient of friction between \(P_{1}\) and the table top is \(\mu,\) and \(\mu<1\). The system is released from rest. Show that \(P_{1}\) will fall off the edge of the table if and only if \[ \mu<\frac{b}{2d-b}. \] Suppose that \(\mu>b/(2d-b)\) , so that \(P_{1}\) comes to rest on the table, and that the coefficient of restitution between \(P_{2}\) and the floor is \(e\). Show that, if \(e>1/(2\mu),\) then \(P_{1}\) comes to rest before \(P_{2}\) bounces a second time.

1992 Paper 2 Q14
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

\noindent

\psset{xunit=1.0cm,yunit=1.0cm,algebraic=true,dimen=middle,dotstyle=o,dotsize=3pt 0,linewidth=0.5pt,arrowsize=3pt 2,arrowinset=0.25} \begin{pspicture*}(-3.36,-3.71)(5.32,4.49) \pspolygon[linewidth=0pt,linecolor=white,hatchcolor=black,fillstyle=hlines,hatchangle=45.0,hatchsep=0.19](-3,4.22)(-3,4)(5,4)(5,4.22) \pscircle(-1,2){1} \pscircle(3,2){1} \pscircle(1,-1){1} \psline(0,2)(0,-1) \psline(2,2)(2,-1) \psline(-2,2)(-2,-1) \psline(4,2)(4,-1) \psline{->}(-2,-1.44)(-2,-2) \rput[tl](-2.25,-2.31){\(m_1g\)} \psline{->}(4,-1.44)(4,-2) \rput[tl](3.74,-2.25){\(m_2g\)} \psline{->}(1,-1)(1.02,-2.78) \rput[tl](0.72,-3.06){\(m_3g\)} \psline(-1,2)(-1,4) \psline(3,2)(3,4) \psline(-3,4)(5,4) \rput[tl](-1.19,1.67){\(P_1\)} \rput[tl](2.83,1.64){\(P_2\)} \rput[tl](0.83,-0.5){\(P_3\)} \begin{scriptsize} \psdots[dotstyle=*](-1,2) \psdots[dotstyle=*](3,2) \psdots[dotstyle=*](1,-1) \psdots[dotstyle=*](-2,-1) \psdots[dotstyle=*](4,-1) \end{scriptsize} \end{pspicture*} \par
\noindent In the diagram \(P_{1}\) and \(P_{2}\) are smooth light pulleys fixed at the same height, and \(P_{3}\) is a third smooth light pulley, freely suspended. A smooth light inextensible string runs over \(P_{1},\) under \(P_{3}\) and over \(P_{2},\) as shown: the parts of the string not in contact with any pulley are vertical. A particle of mass \(m_{3}\) is attached to \(P_{3}.\) There is a particle of mass \(m_{1}\) attached to the end of the string below \(P_{1}\) and a particle of mass \(m_{2}\) attached to the other end, below \(P_{2}.\) The system is released from rest. Find the tension in the string, and show that the pulley \(P_{3}\) will remain at rest if \[ 4m_{1}m_{2}=m_{3}(m_{1}+m_{2}). \]