Year: 2012
Paper: 1
Question Number: 6
Course: LFM Pure
Section: Trigonometry 2
Difficulty Rating: 1516.0
Difficulty Comparisons: 1
Banger Rating: 1484.0
Banger Comparisons: 1
A thin circular path with diameter $AB$ is laid on horizontal ground. A vertical flagpole is erected with its base at a point $D$ on the diameter $AB$. The angles of elevation of the top of the flagpole from $A$ and $B$ are $\alpha$ and $\beta$ respectively (both are acute). The point $C$ lies on the circular path with $DC$ perpendicular to $AB$ and the angle of elevation of the top of the flagpole from $C$ is $\phi$. Show that $\cot\alpha\cot \beta = \cot^2\phi$.
Show that, for any $p$ and $q$,
\[
\cos p \cos q \sin^2\tfrac12(p+q) - \sin p\sin q \cos^2 \tfrac12 (p+q) = \tfrac12 \cos(p+q) -\tfrac12 \cos(p+q)\cos(p-q)
.\]
Deduce that, if $p$ and $q$ are positive and $ p+q \le \tfrac12 \pi$,
then
\[
\cot p\cot q\, \ge \cot^2 \tfrac12(p+q) \,
\]
and hence show that $\phi \le \tfrac12(\alpha+\beta)$ when $ \alpha +\beta \le \tfrac12 \pi\,$.
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
% --- Parameters ---
\def\R{3.5} % Radius of the circle in "world" units
\def\yscale{0.3} % Vertical compression factor for the ground (0.3 makes it look flat)
\def\rot{-25} % Rotation of diameter AB on the ground plane (degrees)
\def\dOffset{1.0} % Distance of D from center (along AB)
\def\h{3.5} % Height of the flagpole
% --- Coordinate Transformation Function ---
% We calculate coordinates in a flat "circle world" first,
% then rotate them, then squash the y-coordinate to create the perspective.
% Center
\coordinate (O) at (0,0);
% 1. Define points in Circle World (Unrotated, Unsquashed)
% A and B are on the x-axis
% D is at x = \dOffset
% C is at x = \dOffset, y = -sqrt(R^2 - d^2) (Negative to be "in front")
\pgfmathsetmacro{\xc}{\dOffset}
\pgfmathsetmacro{\yc}{-sqrt(\R*\R - \dOffset*\dOffset)}
% 2. Apply Rotation (\rot) and Perspective (\yscale)
% Formula:
% x_final = x*cos(rot) - y*sin(rot)
% y_final = (x*sin(rot) + y*cos(rot)) * yscale
% Point A (-R, 0)
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Ax}{-\R*cos(\rot)}
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Ay}{-\R*sin(\rot)*\yscale}
\coordinate (A) at (\Ax, \Ay);
% Point B (R, 0)
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Bx}{\R*cos(\rot)}
\pgfmathsetmacro{\By}{\R*sin(\rot)*\yscale}
\coordinate (B) at (\Bx, \By);
% Point D (\dOffset, 0)
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Dx}{\dOffset*cos(\rot)}
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Dy}{\dOffset*sin(\rot)*\yscale}
\coordinate (D) at (\Dx, \Dy);
% Point C (\xc, \yc)
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Cx}{\xc*cos(\rot) - \yc*sin(\rot)}
\pgfmathsetmacro{\Cy}{(\xc*sin(\rot) + \yc*cos(\rot))*\yscale}
\coordinate (C) at (\Cx, \Cy);
% Top of Flagpole (Same x as D, y is D.y + h)
\coordinate (T) at (\Dx, \Dy + \h);
% --- Drawing ---
% 1. Ground Plane (Ellipse)
% The ellipse is aligned with the page axes to ensure it looks "flat"
\draw[thick, gray!80!black] (O) ellipse ({\R} and {\R*\yscale});
% Optional: Add a lighter fill or dashed back line for better depth?
% Let's just redraw the back half dashed for clarity
\begin{scope}
\clip (-\R-1, 0) rectangle (\R+1, \R);
\draw[dashed, gray] (O) ellipse ({\R} and {\R*\yscale});
\end{scope}
% 2. Ground Lines
% Diameter AB
\draw[thick, black] (A) -- (B);
% Chord DC (Ground)
% Since DC is perpendicular to AB in reality, we draw the line connecting them.
\draw[dashed, black] (D) -- (C);
% 3. Vertical Geometry
% Flagpole
\draw[ultra thick, black] (D) -- (T) node[pos=0.5, right] {$h$};
% Sight Lines
\draw[thick, blue] (A) -- (T);
\draw[thick, blue] (B) -- (T);
\draw[thick, blue] (C) -- (T);
% --- Angles ---
% Angle Alpha at A
% We approximate the perspective arc
\pic [draw, red, angle radius=.8cm, angle eccentricity=1.5, "$\alpha$"] {angle = D--A--T};
\pic [draw, red, angle radius=.8cm, angle eccentricity=1.5, "$\beta$"] {angle = T--B--D};
\pic [draw, red, angle radius=.8cm, angle eccentricity=1.5, "$\phi$"] {angle = D--C--T};
% --- Right Angle Markers ---
% Right angle at D (Ground)
% Use coords to create a small parallelogram aligned with AB and DC
\coordinate (D_arm_AB) at ($(D)!0.25cm!(B)$);
\coordinate (D_arm_DC) at ($(D)!0.25cm!(C)$);
\coordinate (D_corner) at ($(D_arm_AB) + (D_arm_DC) - (D)$);
\draw[thin, black!70] (D_arm_AB) -- (D_corner) -- (D_arm_DC);
% Right angle at D (Pole)
% A small rectangle upright
\draw[thin, black!70] ($(D)+(0,0.25)$) -- ++($(D_arm_AB)-(D)$) -- (D_arm_AB);
% --- Labels ---
\fill[black] (A) circle (1.5pt) node[left] {$A$};
\fill[black] (B) circle (1.5pt) node[right] {$B$};
\fill[black] (C) circle (1.5pt) node[below] {$C$};
\fill[black] (D) circle (1.5pt) node[below right, xshift=-1pt, yshift=-1pt] {$D$};
\fill[black] (T) circle (1.5pt) node[above] {Top};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\begin{align*}
&& \cot \alpha &= \frac{AD}{h} \\
&& \cot \beta &= \frac{BD}{h} \\
&& \cot \phi &= \frac{DC}h \\
&& CD^2 &= AB \cdot BD \tag{intersecting chords} \\
\Rightarrow && \cot^2 \phi &= \cot \alpha \cot \beta
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
&& LHS &= \cos p \cos q \sin^2\tfrac12(p+q) - \sin p\sin q \cos^2 \tfrac12 (p+q) \\
&&&= \cos p \cos q \left ( \frac{1-\cos(p+q)}{2} \right) - \sin p\sin q \left (\frac{1+\cos(p+q)}{2} \right) \\
&&&= \frac12 \left (\cos p \cos q(1-\cos(p+q)) - \sin p\sin q (1+\cos(p+q)) \right) \\
&&&= \frac12 \left ((\cos p \cos q- \sin p\sin q) - (\cos p \cos q+ \sin p\sin q)\cos(p+q) \right) \\
&&&= \frac12 \left (\cos(p+q) - \cos (p-q)\cos(p+q) \right) \\
&&&= RHS
\end{align*}
Therefore
\begin{align*}
\cot p \cot q -\cot^2 \tfrac12 (p+q) &= \frac{\tfrac12 \cos(p+q) -\tfrac12 \cos(p+q)\cos(p-q)}{\sin p \sin q \sin^2 \tfrac12(p+q)} \\
&=\frac{\cos(p+q)(1-\cos(p-q))}{\sin p \sin q \sin^2 \tfrac12(p+q)}
\end{align*}
Since $p,q$ are acute, the denominator is positive. Since $p+q \leq \frac{\pi}{2}$, we have $\cos(p+q) \geq 0$. Also $(1-\cos(p-q)) \geq 0$. Thus, the expression is $\geq 0$.
So we must have
\begin{align*}
&& \cot^2 \phi &= \cot \alpha \cot \beta \\
&&&\geq \cot^2 \tfrac12(\alpha+\beta)
\end{align*}
Since $\cot$ is decreasing on $(0, \tfrac12 \pi)$ we can deduce $\phi \leq \tfrac12 (\alpha+\beta)$
This question was not attempted by many candidates, possibly due to the apparent three‐dimensional nature of the problem (although it reduces to a two‐dimensional problem immediately). Many candidates solved the first part of the problem through applications of Pythagoras theorem in the various right‐angled triangles that can be identified rather than using the similarity that is present. A number of candidates got the expressions for the tangent and cotangent confused. Where candidates attempted the second part they were generally more successful, although care needed to be taken over the individual steps. Relating the identity to the first part of the question involved an understanding of the trigonometric graphs and this was done successfully by a number of candidates.