The sequence \(x_n\) for \(n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\) is defined by \(x_0 = 1\) and by
\[x_{n+1} = \frac{x_n + 2}{x_n + 1}\]
for \(n \geqslant 0\).
Explain briefly why \(x_n \geqslant 1\) for all \(n\).
Show that \(x_{n+1}^2 - 2\) and \(x_n^2 - 2\) have opposite sign, and that
\[\left|x_{n+1}^2 - 2\right| \leqslant \tfrac{1}{4}\left|x_n^2 - 2\right|\,.\]
Show that
\[2 - 10^{-6} \leqslant x_{10}^2 \leqslant 2\,.\]
The sequence \(y_n\) for \(n = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\) is defined by \(y_0 = 1\) and by
\[y_{n+1} = \frac{y_n^2 + 2}{2y_n}\]
for \(n \geqslant 0\).
Show that, for \(n \geqslant 0\),
\[y_{n+1} - \sqrt{2} = \frac{(y_n - \sqrt{2})^2}{2y_n}\]
and deduce that \(y_n \geqslant 1\) for \(n \geqslant 0\).
Show that
\[y_n - \sqrt{2} \leqslant 2\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}-1}{2}\right)^{2^n}\]
for \(n \geqslant 1\).
Using the fact that
\[\sqrt{2} - 1 < \tfrac{1}{2}\,,\]
or otherwise, show that
\[\sqrt{2} \leqslant y_{10} \leqslant \sqrt{2} + 10^{-600}\,.\]
A sequence \(x_1, x_2, \ldots\) of real numbers is defined by \(x_{n+1} = x_n^2 - 2\) for \(n \geqslant 1\) and \(x_1 = a\).
Show that if \(a > 2\) then \(x_n \geqslant 2 + 4^{n-1}(a-2)\).
Show also that \(x_n \to \infty\) as \(n \to \infty\) if and only if \(|a| > 2\).
When \(a > 2\), a second sequence \(y_1, y_2, \ldots\) is defined by
\[
y_n = \frac{Ax_1 x_2 \cdots x_n}{x_{n+1}},
\]
where \(A\) is a positive constant and \(n \geqslant 1\).
Prove that, for a certain value of \(a\), with \(a > 2\), which you should find in terms of \(A\),
\[
y_n = \frac{\sqrt{x_{n+1}^2 - 4}}{x_{n+1}}
\]
for all \(n \geqslant 1\).
Determine whether, for this value of \(a\), the second sequence converges.
Claim \(x_n \geqslant 2 + 4^{n-1}(a-2)\)
Proof: (By induction)
Base case: Note that when \(n = 1\), \(x_1 = a = 2 + 1 \cdot(a - 2)\).
Inductive step, suppose true for some \(n\), then
\begin{align*}
&& x_{n+1} &= x_n^2 - 2 \\
&&&\geq (2+4^{n-1}(a-2))^2 - 2 \\
&&&= 4 + 4^{2n-2}(a-2)^2 + 4^n(a-2) - 2 \\
&&&= 2 + 4^{n}(a-2) + 4^{2n-2}(a-2)^2 \\
&&&\geq 2 + 4^{n+1-1}(a-2)
\end{align*}
as required,
(\(\Leftarrow\)) Suppose \(a > 2\) then \(x_n \geq 2+4^{n-1}(a-2) \to \infty\) as required. Suppose \(a < -2\) then \(x_2 > 4 -2 = 2\) so the sequence starting from \(x_2\) clearly diverges for the same reason.
(\(\Rightarrow\)) suppose \(|x_n| \leq 2\) then \(x_{n+1} = x_n^2 - 2 \leq 2\) so the sequence is bounded and cannot tend to \(\infty\).
Prove that, for any numbers \(a_1, a_2, \ldots\,,\)
and \(b_1, b_2, \ldots\,,\) and for \(n\ge1\),
\[
\sum_{m=1}^n a_m(b_{m+1} -b_m) = a_{n+1}b_{n+1} -a_1b_1
-\sum_{m=1}^n b_{m+1}(a_{m+1} -a_m)
\,.
\]
By setting \(b_m = \sin mx\), show that
\[
\sum_{m=1}^n \cos (m+\tfrac12)x
= \tfrac12
\big(\sin (n+1)x - \sin x \big)
\cosec \tfrac12 x
\,.
\]
Note: $\sin A - \sin B = \displaystyle 2
\cos \big( \tfrac{{\displaystyle A+B\vphantom{_1}}}
{\displaystyle 2\vphantom{^1}} \big)\,
\sin\big( \tfrac{{\displaystyle A-B\vphantom{_1}}}{\displaystyle 2\vphantom{^1}} \big)\,
$.
Show that
\[
\sum_{m=1}^n m\sin mx
=
\big (p \sin(n+1)x +q \sin nx\big)
\cosec^2 \tfrac12 x
\,,
\]
where \(p\) and \(q\) are to be determined in terms of \(n\).
Note: \(2\sin A \sin B = \cos (A-B) - \cos (A+B)\,\);
Note: \(2\cos A \sin B = \sin (A+B) - \sin (A-B)\,\).
Evaluate the integral
\[
\hphantom{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
(m> \tfrac12)\,.}
\int_{m-\frac12} ^\infty \frac 1{x^2}\, \d x
{ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
(m > \tfrac12)\,.}
\]
Show by means of a sketch that
\[
\sum_{r=m}^n \frac 1 {r^2}
\approx \int_{m-\frac12}^{n+\frac12} \frac1 {x^2} \, \d x
\,,
\tag{\(*\)}
\]
where \(m\) and \(n\) are positive integers with \(m < n\).
You are given that the infinite series \(\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac 1 {r^2}\) converges to a value denoted by \(E\). Use \((*)\) to obtain the following approximations for \(E\):
\[
E\approx 2\,; \ \ \ \
E\approx \frac53\,; \ \ \ \
E\approx \frac{33}{20}
\,.\]
Show that, when \(r\) is large, the error in approximating \(\dfrac 1{r^2}\) by \(\displaystyle \int_{r-\frac12}^{r+\frac12} \frac 1 {x^2} \, \d x\) is approximately \(\dfrac 1{4r^4}\,\).
Given that \(E \approx 1.645\), show that \(\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac1{r^4} \approx 1.08\, \).
Notice that \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{r^2} \approx \int_{r-\frac12}^{r+\frac12} \frac{1}{x^2} \d x\) as the area of the orange boxes and under the blue lines are similar.
By considering \(\displaystyle \frac1{1+ x^r} - \frac1{1+ x^{r +1}}\) for \(\vert x \vert \ne 1\), simplify
\[ \sum_{r=1}^N \frac{x^r}{(1+x^r)(1+x^{r+1})} \]
Show that, for \(\vert x \vert <1\),
\[
\sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac{x^r}{(1+x^r)(1+x^{r+1})} = \frac x {1-x^2}
\]
Deduce that
\[
\sum_{r=1}^\infty \textrm{sech}(ry)\textrm{sech}((r + 1)y) = 2\e^{-y} \textrm{cosech}(2 y)
\]
for \(y > 0\).
Hence simplify
\[ \sum_{r=-\infty}^\infty \textrm{sech}(ry) \textrm{sech}((r + 1)y) \]
for \(y>0\).
The numbers \(f(r)\) satisfy \(f(r)>f(r+1)\) for $r=1, 2,
\dots\(. Show that, for any non-negative integer \)n$,
\[
k^n(k-1) \, f(k^{n+1}) \le \sum_{r=k^n}^{k^{n+1}-1}f(r) \le k^n(k-1)\,
f(k^n)\,
\]
where \(k\) is an integer greater than 1.
By taking \(f(r) = 1/r\), show that
\[
\frac{N+1}2 \le \sum_{r=1}^{2^{N+1}-1} \frac1r \le N+1 \,.
\]
Deduce that the sum \(\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac1r\) does not converge.
By taking \(f(r)= 1/r^3\), show that
\[
\sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac1 {r^3} \le 1 \tfrac 13 \,.
\]
Let \(S(n)\) be the set of positive integers less than \(n\) which do not have a \(2\) in their decimal representation and let \(\sigma(n)\) be the sum of the reciprocals of the numbers in \(S(n)\), so for example \(\sigma(5) = 1+\frac13+\frac14\). Show that \(S(1000)\) contains \(9^3-1\) distinct numbers.
Show that \(\sigma (n) < 80\) for all \(n\).
Notice that if \(f(r) = 1/r\) then \(f(r) > f(r+1)\) so we can apply our lemma, ie
\begin{align*}
&&&2^N(2-1) \frac{1}{2^{N+1}} &\leq & \sum_{r=2^N}^{2^{N+1}-1} \frac1r &\leq&\quad 2^N(2-1) \frac{1}{2^{N}} \\
\Leftrightarrow &&& \frac12 &\leq &
\sum_{r=2^N}^{2^{N+1}-1} \frac1r &\leq&\quad 1 \\
\Rightarrow &&& \frac12+\frac12+\cdots+\frac12 &\leq &
\underbrace{\sum_{r=2^0}^{2^{0+1}-1} \frac1r+\sum_{r=2^1}^{2^{1+1}-1} \frac1r+\cdots+\sum_{r=2^N}^{2^{N+1}-1} \frac1r}_{N+1 \text{ terms}} &\leq&\quad 1 +1+\cdots+1\\
\Rightarrow &&& \frac{N+1}{2} &\leq &
\underbrace{\sum_{r=1}^{2^{N+1}-1} \frac1r}_{N+1 \text{ terms}} &\leq&\quad N+1
\end{align*}
Therefore the sum \(\displaystyle \sum_{r=1}^{2^{N+1}-1} \frac1r\) is always greater than \(N+1\) and in particular we can find an upper limit such that it is always bigger than any value, ie it diverges.
To count the number of numbers less than \(1000\) without a \(2\) in their decimal representation we can count the number of \(3\) digit numbers (where \(0\) is an acceptable leading digit) which don't contain a \(2\) and remove \(0\). There are \(9\) choices for each digit, so \(9^3-1\). Notice this is true for \(10^N\) for any \(N\), ie \(S(10^N) = 9^N-1\).
Notice also that we can now write:
\begin{align*}
&& \sum_{r=10^N }^{10^{N+1}-1} \frac{1}{r} \mathbb{1}_{r \in S} & < \frac{1}{10^{N+1}}\#\{\text{number not containing a }2\} \\
&&&= \frac{1}{10^{N+1}}((9^{N+1}-1)-(9^N-1)) \\
&&&= \frac{9^N}{10^N}(9-1) \\
&&&= 8 \cdot \left (\frac9{10} \right)^N \\
\\
\Rightarrow && \sum_{r=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{r} \mathbb{1}_{r \in S} &< 8\left ( 1 + \frac9{10} + \cdots \right) \\
&&&= 8 \frac{1}{1-\frac{9}{10}} = 80
\end{align*}
In this question, the following theorem may be used.
Let \(u_1\), \(u_2\), \(\ldots\) be a sequence of (real) numbers. If the sequence is bounded above (that is, \(u_n\le b\) for all \(n\), where \(b\) is some fixed number) and increasing (that is, \(u_n \ge u_{n-1}\) for all \(n\)), then the sequence tends to a limit (that is, converges).
The sequence \(u_1\), \(u_2\), \(\ldots\) is defined by \(u_1=1\) and
\[
u_{n+1} = 1+\frac 1{u_n} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (n\ge1)\,.
\tag{\(*\)}
\]
Show that, for \(n\ge3\),
\[
u_{n+2}-u_n = \frac{u_{n} - u_{n-2}}{(1+u_n)(1+u_{n-2})}
.
\]
Prove, by induction or otherwise, that \(1\le u_n \le 2\) for all \(n\).
Show that the sequence \(u_1\), \(u_3\), \(u_5\), \(\ldots\) tends to a limit, and that the sequence \(u_2\), \(u_4\), \(u_6\), \(\ldots\)
tends to a limit. Find these limits and deduce that the sequence \(u_1\), \(u_2\), \(u_3\), \(\ldots\,\) tends to a limit.
Would this conclusion change if the sequence were defined by \((*)\) and \(u_1=3\)?
Claim: \(u_n \in [1,2]\)
Proof: (By induction).
Note that \(u_1 = 1, u_2 = 2\) so our claim is true for the first few terms.
Note that if \(u_n \in [1,2]\), \(\frac{1}{u_n} \in [\tfrac12, 1]\) and \(1+\frac{1}{u_{n}} \in [\tfrac32,2] \subset [1,2]\). Therefore \(u_{n+1} \in [1,2]\).
Therefore since \(u_1 \in [1,2]\) and \(u_n \in [1,2] \Rightarrow u_{n+1} \in [1,2]\) \(u_n \in [1,2]\) for all \(n \ge 1\)
First notice that \(u_3 = \frac32 > u_1\) and therefore by the recursion we found in the first part, \(u_{2n+1}-u_{2n-1} > 0\) so \(u_{2k+1}\) is increasing and bounded, and so by our theorem converges to a limit. Suppose this limit is \(L\), then we must have \(L = 1 + \frac1{L} \Rightarrow L^2 - L - 1 = 0 \Rightarrow L = \frac{1+\sqrt5}{2}\) since it must be in \([1,2]\).
Similarly, not that \(u_4 = \frac{5}{3} < u_2\) and so \(u_{2k+2} - u_{2k} < 0\) and \(-u_{2k}\) is increasing and bounded above. Therefore it tends to a limit (and so does \(u_{2k}\)). By the same reasoning as before, it's the same limit, \(\frac{1+\sqrt5}{2}\) and therefore the sequence converges.
If \(u_1 = 3, u_2 = \frac43 \in [1,2]\) so we have our sequence being bounded and all the same logic will follow through.
A sequence of numbers \(t_0\), \(t_1\), \(t_2\), \(\ldots\,\) satisfies
\[
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
t_{n+2} = p t_{n+1}+qt_{n} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (n\ge0),
\]
where \(p\) and \(q\) are real. Throughout this question, \(x\), \(y\) and \(z\) are non-zero real numbers.
Show that, if \(t_n=x\) for all values of \(n\), then \(p+q=1\) and \(x\) can be any (non-zero) real number.
Show that, if \(t_{2n} = x\) and \(t_{2n+1}=y\) for all values of \(n\), then \(q\pm p=1\). Deduce that either \(x=y\) or \(x=-y\), unless \(p\) and \(q\) take certain values that you should identify.
Show that, if \(t_{3n} = x\), \(t_{3n+1}=y\) and \(t_{3n+2}=z\) for all values of \(n\), then
\[
p^3+q^3 +3pq-1=0\,.
\]
Deduce that either \(p+q=1\) or \((p-q)^2 +(p+1)^2+(q+1)^2=0\). Hence show that either \(x=y=z\) or \(x+y+z=0\).
Suppose \(t_n = x\) for all \(n\), then we must have
\begin{align*}
&& x &= p x + q x \\
\Leftrightarrow && 1 &= p+q
\end{align*}
and this clearly works for any value of \(x\).
Suppose \(t_{2n} = x, t_{2n+1} = y\) for all \(n\), then
\begin{align*}
&& x &= py + q x \\
&& y &= px + q y \\
\Rightarrow && 0 &= py + (q-1) x \\
&& 0 &= px + (q-1) y \\
\Rightarrow && p &= (q-1) \frac{x}{y} = (q-1) \frac{y}{x} \\
\Rightarrow && \frac{y}{x} = \pm 1 & \text{ or } q = 1, p = 0 \\
\Rightarrow && y = \pm x & \text{ or } (p,q) = (0,1) \\
\end{align*}
Suppose \(t_{3n} = x\), \(t_{3n+1}=y\) and \(t_{3n+2}=z\) , so
\begin{align*}
&& x &= pz + qy \\
&& y & = px + qz \\
&& z &= py + qx \\
\\
&& z &= p(px+qz) + q(pz + qy) \\
&&&= p^2x + 2pqz + q^2 y \\
&&&= p^2(pz+qy) + 2pqz + q^2(px+qz) \\
&&&= p^3 z + p^2qy + 2pqz + q^2p x + q^3 z \\
&&&= (p^3+q^3+2pq)z + pq(py+qx) \\
&&&= (p^3 + q^3 + 2pq)z + pq z \\
&&&= (p^3 + q^3 + 3pq)z \\
\Rightarrow && 0 &= p^3 + q^3 + 3pq- 1 \\
&&&= (p+q-1)(p^2+q^2+1+p+q-pq) \\
&&&= \tfrac12(p+q-1)((p-q)^2+(p+1)^2+(q+1)^2)
\end{align*}
Therefore \(p+q = 1\) or \((p-q)^2+(p+1)^2+(q+1)^2 = 0 \Rightarrow p = q = -1\).
If \(p+q = 1\), then \(z = py + (1-p)x\) and \(x = p(py+(1-p)x) + (1-p)y \Rightarrow (1-p+p^2)x = (1-p+p^2)y \Rightarrow x = y \Rightarrow x= y = z\).
If \(p = q = -1\) then adding all the equations we get \(x + y + z = -2(x+y+z) \Rightarrow x + y + z = 0\)
Note that what is actually going on here is that solutions must be of the form \(t_n = \lambda^n\) so the only way to be constant is for \(\lambda = 1\) to be a root, the only way for it to be \(2\)-periodic is for \(\lambda = -1\) to be a root, and the only way for it to be \(3\)-periodic is for \(\lambda = 1, \omega, \omega^2\) to be the roots (although we see this via the classic \(x^3 + y^3 + z^3 - 3xyz = (x+y+z)(x + \omega y + \omega^2 z)(x+\omega^2 y +\omega z)\) which is because of the real constraint in the question.
The positive numbers \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) and \(q\) satisfy
\(\beta-\alpha >q\). Show that
\[
\frac{\alpha^2+\beta^2 -q^2}{\alpha\beta}-2> 0\,.
\]
The sequence \(u_0\), \(u_1\), \(\ldots\) is defined by \(u_0=\alpha\),
\(u_1=\beta\) and
\[
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
u_{n+1} = \frac {u_{n}^2 -q^2}{u_{n-1}}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (n\ge1),
\]
where \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) and \(q\) are given positive numbers (and \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are such that no term in the sequence is zero).
Prove that \(u_n(u_n+u_{n+2}) = u_{n+1}(u_{n-1}+u_{n+1})\,\).
Prove also that
\[
u_{n+1} -pu_n + u_{n-1}=0
\]
for some number \(p\) which you should express in terms of \(\alpha\), \(\beta\) and \(q\). Hence, or otherwise, show that if \(\beta> \alpha+q\), the sequence is strictly increasing (that is, \(u_{n+1}-u_n > 0\) for all \(n\)). Comment on the case \(\beta =\alpha +q\).
Given that \(y = \cos(m \arcsin x)\), for \(\vert x \vert <1\), prove that
\[
(1-x^2) \frac {\d^2 y}{\d x^2} -x \frac {\d y}{\d x} +m^2y=0\,.
\]
Obtain a similar equation relating \(\dfrac{\d^3y}{\d x^3}\,\), \(\dfrac{\d^2y}{\d x^2}\, \) and \(\, \dfrac{\d y}{\d x}\,\), and a similar equation relating \(\dfrac{\d^4y}{\d x^4}\,\), \(\dfrac{\d^3y}{\d x^3}\,\) and \(\,\dfrac{\d^2 y}{\d x^2}\,\).
Conjecture and prove a relation between \(\dfrac{\d^{n+2}y}{\d x^{n+2}}\,\), \(\dfrac{\d^{n+1}y}{\d x^{n+1}}\;\) and \(\;\dfrac{\d^n y}{\d x^n}\,\).
Obtain the first three non-zero terms of the Maclaurin series for \(y\). Show that, if \(m\) is an even integer, \(\cos m\theta\) may be written as a polynomial in \(\sin\theta\) beginning
\[
1 - \frac{m^2\sin^2\theta}{2!}+ \frac{m^2(m^2-2^2)\sin^4\theta}{4!} -\cdots \,.
\, \tag{\(\vert\theta\vert < \tfrac12 \pi\)}
\]
State the degree of the polynomial.
Let \(S_k(n) \equiv \sum\limits_{r=0}^n r^k\,\), where \(k\) is a positive integer, so that
\[
S_1(n) \equiv \tfrac12 n(n+1)
\text{ and }
S_2(n) \equiv \tfrac16 n(n+1)(2n+1)\,.
\]
By considering \(\sum\limits_{r=0}^n \left[ (r+1)^k-r^k\right]\, \),
show that
\[
kS_{k-1}(n)=(n+1)^k -(n+1) -
\binom{k}{2} S_{k-2}(n)
- \binom {k}{3} S_{k-3}(n) - \cdots
- \binom{k}{k-1} S_{1}(n)
\;.
\tag{\(*\)}
\]
Obtain simplified expressions for \(S_3(n)\) and \(S_4(n)\).
Explain, using \((*)\), why \(S_k(n)\) is a polynomial of degree \(k+1\) in \(n\). Show that in this polynomial the constant term is zero and the sum of the coefficients is 1.
Proceeding by induction, since \(S_k(n)\) is a polynomial of degree \(k+1\) for small \(k\), we can see that
\[ (k+1)S_k(n) = \underbrace{(n+1)^{k+1}}_{\text{poly deg }=k+1} - \underbrace{(n+1)}_{\text{poly deg}=1} - \underbrace{\binom{k+1}{2}S_{k-1}(n)}_{\text{poly deg}=k} - \underbrace{\cdots}_{\text{polys deg}< k} - \underbrace{\binom{k+1}{k} S_1(n)}_{\text{poly deg}=1}\]
therefore \(S_k(n)\) is a polynomial of degree \(k+1\) (in fact with leading coefficient \(\frac{1}{k+1}\). Since \(S_k(0) = \sum_{r=0}^{0} r^k = 0\) there is no constant term, and since \(S_k(1) = \sum_{r=0}^1 r^k = 1\) the sum of the coefficients is \(1\)
The sequence of real numbers \(u_1\), \(u_2\), \(u_3\), \(\ldots\) is defined by
\begin{equation*}
u_1=2 \,,
\qquad\text{and} \qquad u_{n+1} = k - \frac{36}{u_n}
\quad \text{for } n\ge1,
\tag{\(*\)}
\end{equation*}
where \(k\) is a constant.
Determine the values of \(k\) for which the sequence \((*)\) is:
(a) constant;
(b) periodic with period 2;
(c) periodic with period 4.
In the case \(k=37\), show that \(u_n\ge 2\) for all \(n\). Given that in this
case the sequence \((*)\) converges to a limit
\(\ell\), find the value of \(\ell\).
The sequence \(u_n\) (\(n= 1, 2, \ldots\)) satisfies the recurrence relation
\[
u_{n+2}= \frac{u_{n+1}}{u_n}(ku_n-u_{n+1})
\]
where \(k\) is a constant.
If \(u_1=a\) and \(u_2=b\,\),
where \(a\) and \(b\) are non-zero and \(b \ne ka\,\), prove by induction that
\[
u_{2n}=\Big(\frac b a \Big) u_{2n-1}
\]
\[
u_{2n+1}= c u_{2n}
\]
for \(n \ge 1\),
where \(c\) is a constant to be found in terms of \(k\), \(a\) and \(b\).
Hence express \(u_{2n}\) and \(u_{2n-1}\) in terms of \(a\), \(b\), \(c\) and \(n\).
Find conditions on \(a\), \(b\) and \(k\) in the three cases:
A sequence \(t_0\), \(t_1\), \(t_2\), \(...\) is said to be
strictly increasing if \(t_{n+1} > t_n\) for all \(n\ge{0}\,\).
The terms of the sequence \(x_0\,\), \(x_1\,\), \(x_2\,\), \(\ldots\) satisfy
$$
\ds x_{n+1}=\frac{x_n^2 +6}{5}
$$ for \(n\ge{0}\,\).
Prove that if \(x_0 > 3\) then the sequence
is strictly increasing.
The terms of the sequence \(y_0\,\), \(y_1\,\), \(y_2\,\), \(\ldots\)
satisfy
$$
\ds y_{n+1}= 5-\frac 6 {y_n}
$$
for \(n\ge{0}\,\).
Prove that if \(2 < y_0 < 3\)
then the sequence is strictly
increasing but that \(y_n<3\) for all \(n\,\).
Given a sequence \(w_0\), \(w_1\), \(w_2\), \(\ldots\,\), the sequence \(F_1\), \(F_2\), \(\ldots\) is
defined by
$$F_n = w_n^2 + w_{n-1}^2 - 4w_nw_{n-1} \,.$$
Show that
$\;
F_{n}-F_{n-1} = \l w_n-w_{n-2} \r \l w_n+w_{n-2}-4w_{n-1} \r \;
\( for \)n \ge 2\,$.
The sequence \(u_0\), \(u_1\), \(u_2\), \(\ldots\)
has \(u_0 = 1\), and \(u_1 = 2\) and satisfies
\[
u_n = 4u_{n-1} -u_{n-2} \quad (n \ge 2)\;.
\]
Prove that
\ $
u_n^2 + u_{n-1}^2 = 4u_nu_{n-1}-3
\; $
for \(n \ge 1\,\).
A sequence \(v_0\), \(v_1\), \(v_2\), \(\ldots\,\) has \(v_0=1\) and satisfies
\begin{equation*}
v_n^2 + v_{n-1}^2 = 4v_nv_{n-1}-3 \quad (n \ge 1). \tag{\(\ast\)}
\end{equation*}
\makebox[7mm]{(a) \hfill}Find \(v_1\) and prove that, for each \(n\ge2\,\), either
\(v_n= 4v_{n-1} -v_{n-2}\) or \(v_n=v_{n-2}\,\).
\makebox[7mm]{(b) \hfill}Show that the sequence, with period 2, defined by
\begin{equation*}
v_n =
\begin{cases}
1 & \mbox{for \(n\) even} \\
2 & \mbox{for \(n\) odd}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
\makebox[7mm]{\hfill}satisfies \((\ast)\).
\makebox[7mm]{(c) \hfill}Find a sequence \(v_n\) with period 4
which has \(v_0=1\,\), and satisfies~\((\ast)\).
Show that,
if \(n>0\,\), then
$$
\int_{e^{1/n}}^\infty\,{{\ln x} \over {x^{n+1}}}\,\d x
= {2 \over {n^2\e}}\;.
$$
You may assume that \(\ds \frac{\ln x} x \to 0\;\) as \(x\to\infty\,\).
Explain why, if \(1 < a < b\,\), then
$$
\int_b^\infty\,{{\ln x} \over {x^{n+1}}}\,\d x
<
\int_a^\infty\,{{\ln x} \over {x^{n+1}}}\,\d x\;.
$$
Deduce that
$$
\sum_{n=1}^{N}{1 \over n^2} <
{\e \over 2}\int_{\e^{1/N}}^{\infty}
\left({1-x^{-N}} \over {x^2-x}\right) \ln x\,\d x\;,
$$
where \(N\,\) is any integer greater than \(1\).
Given that
$$\e = 1 + {1 \over 1 !} + {1 \over 2 !} + {1 \over 3 !} + \cdots + {1 \over r !} + \cdots \; ,$$
use the binomial theorem to show that
$$
{\left( 1 + {1 \over n} \right)}^{\!n} < \e
$$
for any positive integer \(n\).
The product \({\rm P }( n )\) is defined, for any positive integer \(n\), by
$$
{\rm P} ( n ) = {3 \over 2} \cdot {5 \over 4}
\cdot {9 \over 8} \cdot \ldots \cdot {2^n + 1 \over 2^n} .
$$
Use the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality,
$$
{a_1 + a_2 + \cdots + a_n \over n}
\ge
\ {\left( a_1 \cdot a_2 \cdot \ldots \cdot a_n \right)}^{1 \over n}\,,
$$
to show that \({\rm P }( n ) < \e\) for all \(n\) .
Explain briefly why
\({\rm P} ( n )\) tends to a limit as \(n\to\infty\).
Show that this limit, \(L\), satisfies \(2 < L\le\e\).
Let \(\f(x)=(1+x^2)\e^x\). Show that \(\f'(x)\ge 0\) and sketch the graph of \(\f(x)\).
Hence, or otherwise, show that the equation
\[
(1+x^2)\e^x = k,
\]
where \(k\) is a constant, has exactly one real root if \(k>0\) and no real roots if \(k\le 0\).
Determine the number of real roots of the equation
$$
(\e^x-1) - k \tan^{-1} x=0
$$
in the cases (a) \(0< k\le 2/\pi\) and (b) \(2/\pi < k < 1\).
As \(x \to -\infty\), \(f(x) \to 0\) and as \(x \to \infty\), \(f(x) \to +\infty\) and since \(f\) is strictly increasing we have exactly one solution to \(f(x) = k\) on \((0,\infty)\). Since \(f(x) > 0\) there are no solutions if \(k \leq 0\).
Considering the function \(g(x) = (e^x-1)-k\tan^{-1} x \) then \(g'(x) = e^x - \frac{k}{1+x^2}\) therefore \(g'(x)\) has exactly one turning point when \(k > 0\) and \(0\) otherwise at the root of \(f(x) = k\)
Notice also that \(g(0) = 0\) so we already have one solution, and \(g'(0) = 1 - k > 0\).
Notice from our sketch that if \(0 < k < 1\) the root for \(f(x) = k\) has \(x \leq 0\), so our turning point is to the left of the origin and we are interested in the behaviour of \(g(x)\) as \(x \to -\infty\). (ie do we cross the axis again).
\(\lim_{x \to -\infty} \left [ e^x - 1 - k \tan^{-1} x \right] = 0 - 1 +k \frac{\pi}{2} = k \frac{\pi}{2} - 1\). if this is positive, ie if \(k > \frac{2}{\pi}\) there are two solutions, otherwise there is only one real root.