Problems

Filters
Clear Filters
1987 Paper 2 Q5
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

If \(y=\mathrm{f}(x)\), then the inverse of \(\mathrm{f}\) (when it exists) can be obtained from Lagrange's identity. This identity, which you may use without proof, is \[ \mathrm{f}^{-1}(y)=y+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}\frac{\mathrm{d}^{n-1}}{\mathrm{d}y^{n-1}}\left[y-\mathrm{f}\left(y\right)\right]^{n}, \] provided the series converges.

  1. Verify Lagrange's identity when \(\mathrm{f}(x)=\alpha x\), \((0<\alpha<2)\).
  2. Show that one root of the equation \[ \tfrac{1}{2}=x-\tfrac{1}{4}x^{3} \] is \[ x=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{\left(3n\right)!}{n!\left(2n+1\right)!2^{4n+1}} \]
  3. Find a solution for \(x\), as a series in \(\lambda,\) of the equation \[ x=\mathrm{e}^{\lambda x}. \]
[You may assume that the series in part \((ii) \)converges, and that the series in part \((iii) \)converges for suitable \(\lambda\).]


Solution:

  1. If \(f(x) = \alpha x\) then \(f^{-1}(x) = \frac{1}{\alpha}x\). \begin{align*} && \frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [y - \alpha y]^n &= \frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [(1 - \alpha)^n y^n] \\ && &= (1-\alpha)^n n! y \\ \Rightarrow && y + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n!}\frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [y - \alpha y]^n &= y +\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (1-\alpha)^ny \\ &&&= y + y\l \frac{1}{1-(1-\alpha)}-1 \r \\ &&&= \frac{1}{\alpha}y \end{align*} Where we can sum the geometric progression if \(|1-\alpha| < 1 \Leftrightarrow 0 < \alpha < 2\)
  2. Suppose that \(f(x) = x-\frac14x^3\). We would like to find \(f^{-1}(\frac12)\). \begin{align*} && \frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [y - (y+\frac14 y^3)]^n &= \frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [\frac1{4^n} y^{3n}] \\ && &= \frac{1}{4^n} \frac{(3n)!}{(2n+1)!} y^{2n+1} \\ \Rightarrow && f^{-1}(\frac12) &= \frac12 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{4^n} \frac{(3n)!}{n!(2n+1)!} \frac{1}{2^{2n+1}} \\ &&&= \frac12 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{(3n)!}{n!(2n+1)!} \frac{1}{2^{4n+1}} \\ \end{align*} Since when \(n = 0\) \(\frac{0!}{0!1!} \frac{1}{2^{0+1}} = \frac12\) we can include the wayward \(\frac12\) in our infinite sum and so we have the required result.
  3. Consider \(f(x) = x - e^{\lambda x}\) we are interested in \(f^{-1}(0)\). \begin{align*} && \frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [y - (y-e^{\lambda y})]^n &= \frac{\d^{n-1}}{\d y^{n-1}} [e^{n\lambda y}] \\ &&&= n^{n-1} \lambda^{n-1}e^{n \lambda y} \\ \Rightarrow && f^{-1}(0) &= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n!} n^{n-1} \lambda^{n-1} \end{align*} We don't care about convergence, but it's worth noting this has a radius of convergence of \(\frac{1}{e}\) (ie this series is valid if \(|\lambda| < \frac1e\)).

1987 Paper 2 Q6
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

Let \[ I=\int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi}\frac{\cos^{2}\theta}{1-\sin\theta\sin2\alpha}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\, , \] where \(0<\alpha<\frac{1}{4}\pi\). Show that \[ I=\int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi}\frac{\cos^{2}\theta}{1+\sin\theta\sin2\alpha}\,\mathrm{d}\theta\, , \] and hence that \[ I=\frac{\pi}{\sin^{2}2\alpha}-\cot^{2}2\alpha\int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi}\frac{\sec^{2}\theta}{1+\cos^{2}2\alpha\tan^{2}\theta}\,\mathrm{d}\theta. \] Show that \(I=\frac{1}{2}\pi\sec^{2}\alpha\), and state the value of \(I\) if \(\frac{1}{4}\pi<\alpha<\frac{1}{2}\pi\).


Solution: \begin{align*} \int_{-\frac{1}{2}\pi}^{\frac{1}{2}\pi}\frac{\cos^{2}\theta}{1-\sin\theta\sin2\alpha}\,\mathrm{d}\theta &= \int_{u = \frac12 \pi}^{u = -\frac12 \pi} \frac{\cos^2 (-u)}{1-\sin(-u) \sin 2 \alpha} -\d u \tag{\(u = -\theta\)} \\ &= \int_{\frac12 \pi}^{-\frac12 \pi} \frac{\cos^2 u}{1+\sin u \sin 2 \alpha} -\d u \\ &= \int_{-\frac12 \pi}^{\frac12 \pi} \frac{\cos^2 u}{1+\sin u \sin 2 \alpha} \d u \\ &= \int_{-\frac12 \pi}^{\frac12 \pi} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1+\sin \theta \sin 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ \end{align*} Since \(\displaystyle \frac{1}{(1-a^2u^2)} = \frac12 \l \frac{1}{1+au} + \frac1{1-au} \r\) \begin{align*} \int_{-\frac12 \pi}^{\frac12 \pi} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1+\sin \theta \sin 2 \alpha} \d \theta &= \int_{-\frac12 \pi}^{\frac12 \pi} \frac{\cos^2 \theta}{1-\sin ^2\theta \sin^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ &= \int_{-\frac12 \pi}^{\frac12 \pi} \frac{1-\sin^2 \theta}{1-\sin ^2\theta \sin^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ &= \int_{-\frac12 \pi}^{\frac12 \pi} \frac{(1-\sin ^2\theta \sin^2 2 \alpha) \frac{1}{\sin^2 2\alpha} + 1 - \cosec^2 2\alpha}{1-\sin ^2\theta \sin^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} -\cot^2 2\alpha \int_{-\frac{\pi}2}^{\frac{\pi}2} \frac{1}{1 - \sin^2 \theta \sin^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} -\cot^2 2\alpha \int_{-\frac{\pi}2}^{\frac{\pi}2} \frac{1}{1 - \sin^2 \theta (1-\cos^2 2 \alpha)} \d \theta \\ &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} -\cot^2 2\alpha \int_{-\frac{\pi}2}^{\frac{\pi}2} \frac{1}{\cos^2 \theta +\sin^2 \theta \cos^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} -\cot^2 2\alpha \int_{-\frac{\pi}2}^{\frac{\pi}2} \frac{\sec^2 \theta}{1 +\tan^2 \theta \cos^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta \\ \end{align*} Finally, using the substitution \(u =|\cos 2 \alpha | \tan \theta, \d u = |\cos 2 \alpha |\sec^2 \theta \d \theta\) \begin{align*} \int_{-\frac{\pi}2}^{\frac{\pi}2} \frac{\sec^2 \theta}{1 +\tan^2 \theta \cos^2 2 \alpha} \d \theta &= |\sec 2\alpha|\int_{u = -\infty}^{u = \infty} \frac{1}{1 + u^2} \d u \\ &= |\sec 2 \alpha|\pi \end{align*} and so \begin{align*} I &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} -\cot^2 2\alpha |\sec 2 \alpha|\pi \\ &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} \l 1-\cos 2\alpha \r \\ &= \frac{\pi}{4\sin^2 \alpha\cos^2 \alpha} \l 2 \sin^2 \alpha \r \\ &= \frac{\pi}{2 \cos^2 \alpha} = \frac{\pi}{2} \sec^2 \alpha \end{align*} When \(\alpha\) small enough that the modulus doesn't flip the sign. When if \(\frac{1}{4}\pi<\alpha<\frac{1}{2}\pi\) we have: \begin{align*} I &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} -\cot^2 2\alpha |\sec 2 \alpha|\pi \\ &= \frac{\pi}{\sin^2 2\alpha} \l 1+\cos 2\alpha \r \\ &= \frac{\pi}{4\sin^2 \alpha\cos^2 \alpha} \l 2 \cos^2 \alpha \r \\ &= \frac{\pi}{2 \sin^2 \alpha} = \frac{\pi}{2} \cosec^2 \alpha \end{align*}

1987 Paper 2 Q7
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

A definite integral can be evaluated approximately by means of the Trapezium rule: \[ \int_{x_{0}}^{x_{N}}\mathrm{f}(x)\,\mathrm{d}x\approx\tfrac{1}{2}h\left\{ \mathrm{f}\left(x_{0}\right)+2\mathrm{f}\left(x_{1}\right)+\ldots+2\mathrm{f}\left(x_{N-1}\right)+\mathrm{f}\left(x_{N}\right)\right\} , \] where the interval length \(h\) is given by \(Nh=x_{N}-x_{0}\), and \(x_{r}=x_{0}+rh\). Justify briefly this approximation. Use the Trapezium rule with intervals of unit length to evaluate approximately the integral \[ \int_{1}^{n}\ln x\,\mathrm{d}x, \] where \(n(>2)\) is an integer. Deduce that \(n!\approx\mathrm{g}(n)\), where \[ \mathrm{g}(n)=n^{n+\frac{1}{2}}\mathrm{e}^{1-n}, \] and show by means of a sketch, or otherwise, that \[ n!<\mathrm{g}(n). \] By using the Trapezium rule on the above integral with intervals of width \(k^{-1}\), where \(k\) is a positive integer, show that \[ \left(kn\right)!\approx k!n^{kn+\frac{1}{2}}\left(\frac{\mathrm{e}}{k}\right)^{k\left(1-n\right)}. \] Determine whether this approximation or \(\mathrm{g}(kn)\) is closer to \(\left(kn\right)!\).


Solution:

TikZ diagram
We can approximate the integral by \(N\) trapeziums, each with height \(x_{i+1}-x_{i} = \frac{x_N-x_0}{N} = \frac{h}{N}\). The will have area \(\frac{(f(x_i)+f(x_{i+1}))h}{2}\) and summing all these areas we will get: \[\frac12 h \l f(x_0) + f(x_1) + f(x_1)+f(x_2) + \cdots + f(x_{N-1})+f(x_N) \r = \frac12 h \l f(x_0) +2 f(x_1) + + \cdots +2f(x_{N-1})+f(x_N) \r\] But this is approximately the integral \(\displaystyle \int_{x_0}^{x_N} f(x) \d x\) \begin{align*} && \int_1^n \ln x \d x &= [x \ln x]_1^n - \int_1^n x \cdot \frac{1}{x} \d x \\ &&&= n \ln n - n+1 \\ &&&\approx \frac12 \l \ln 1 + 2\sum_{k=2}^{n-1} \ln k + \ln n \r \\ &&&= \ln (n!) - \frac12 \ln n \\ \Rightarrow && \ln (n!) &\approx n \ln n + \frac12 \ln n - n + 1 \\ \Rightarrow && n! &\approx \exp(n \ln n + \frac12 \ln n - n + 1) \\ &&&=n^{n+\frac12}e^{1-n} \end{align*} Since \(\ln x\) is a concave function, we should expect all the trapeziums to all lie under the curve, therefore this is always an underestimate for the integral, ie \(n! < g(n)\)
TikZ diagram
\begin{align*} && \int_1^n \ln x \d x &= n \ln n - n+1 \\ &&&\approx \frac12 k^{-1} \l \ln 1 + 2\sum_{r=1}^{k(n-1)-1} \ln \l 1+\frac{r}{k} \r + \ln n \r \\ &&&=\frac{1}{2k} \l 2\sum_{r=1}^{k(n-1)-1} \l \ln(k+r) - \ln k)\r + \ln n\r \\ &&&=\frac1{k} \l \ln ((k+k(n-1)-1)!) - \ln(k!) - (k(n-1)-1) \ln k+\frac12\ln n \r \\ &&&=\frac1{k} \l \ln ((kn-1)!) - \ln(k!) - (k(n-1)-1) \ln k+\frac12 \ln n \r \\ &&&=\frac1{k} \l \ln ((kn)! ) -\ln k -\ln n - \ln(k!) - (k(n-1)-1) \ln k+\frac12\ln n \r \\ &&&= \frac1{k} \l \ln ((kn)! ) - \ln(k!) - (k(n-1)) \ln k - \frac12 \ln n\r \\ \Rightarrow && \ln ((kn)!) &\approx kn \ln n - kn + k + \ln(k!) + (k(n-1)) \ln k + \frac12 \ln n\\ \Rightarrow && (kn)! &\approx n^{kn+\frac12}e^{-k(n-1)}k!k^{k(n-1)} \\ &&&= n^{kn+\frac12} k! \l \frac{e}{k} \r^{k(1-n)} \end{align*} I would expect this approximation to be a better approximation for \((kn)!\) since it is created using a finer mesh.

1987 Paper 2 Q8
D: 1500.0 B: 1487.0

Let \(\mathbf{r}\) be the position vector of a point in three-dimensional space. Describe fully the locus of the point whose position vector is \(\mathbf{r}\) in each of the following four cases:

  1. \(\left(\mathbf{a-b}\right) \cdot \mathbf{r}=\frac{1}{2}(\left|\mathbf{a}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathbf{b}\right|^{2});\)
  2. \(\left(\mathbf{a-r}\right)\cdot\left(\mathbf{b-r}\right)=0;\)
  3. \(\left|\mathbf{r-a}\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\left|\mathbf{a-b}\right|^{2};\)
  4. \(\left|\mathbf{r-b}\right|^{2}=\frac{1}{2}\left|\mathbf{a-b}\right|^{2}.\)
Prove algebraically that the equations \((i)\) and \((ii)\) together are equivalent to \((iii)\) and \((iv)\) together. Explain carefully the geometrical meaning of this equivalence.


Solution:

  1. \(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{r} = 0\) is the equation of a plane with normal \(\mathbf{n}\). \(\mathbf{n} \cdot (\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{a}) = 0\) is the equation of a plane through \(\mathbf{a}\) with normal \(\mathbf{n}\). Our expression is: \begin{align*} && \left(\mathbf{a-b}\right) \cdot \mathbf{r}&=\frac{1}{2}(\left|\mathbf{a}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathbf{b}\right|^{2}) \\ &&&=\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b})\cdot(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}) \\ \Leftrightarrow && \left(\mathbf{a-b}\right) \cdot \left ( \mathbf{r} - \frac12 (\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}) \right) &= 0 \end{align*} So this is a plane through \(\frac12 (\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b})\) perpendicular to \(\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b}\). ie the plane halfway between \(\mathbf{a}\) and \(\mathbf{b}\) perpendicular to the line between them.
  2. \begin{align*} && 0 &= \left(\mathbf{a-r}\right)\cdot\left(\mathbf{b-r}\right) \\ &&&= \mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{b} - \mathbf{r} \cdot (\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}) + \mathbf{r}\cdot\mathbf{r} \\ &&&= \left ( \mathbf{r}- \frac12(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}) \right) \cdot \left ( \mathbf{r}- \frac12(\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}) \right) - \frac14 \left (\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{a}+2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} + \mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{b} \right) +\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} \\ &&&= \left | \mathbf{r} - \frac12 \left (\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b} \right) \right|^2 - \left |\frac12 \left ( \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{b}\right) \right|^2 \end{align*} Therefore this is a sphere, centre \(\frac12 \left (\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b} \right)\) radius \(\left |\frac12 \left ( \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{b}\right) \right|\)
  3. This is a sphere centre \(\mathbf{a}\) radius \(\frac1{\sqrt{2}} \left|\mathbf{a-b}\right|\)
  4. This is a sphere centre \(\mathbf{b}\) radius \(\frac1{\sqrt{2}} \left|\mathbf{a-b}\right|\)
Suppose the first two cases are true, then by symmetry it suffices to show that we can prove either of the second cases are true. (Since everything is symmetric in \(\mathbf{a}\) and \(\mathbf{b}\)). It's useful to note that \(\mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{r} = \mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{b} + \mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{a} -\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b}\) from the second condition. \begin{align*} \left|\mathbf{r-a}\right|^{2} &= \mathbf{r} \cdot \mathbf{r}-2\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{r} + \mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{a} \\ &= \mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{b} + \mathbf{r}\cdot \mathbf{a} -\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 2\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{r} + \mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{a} \\ &= \mathbf{r} \cdot ( \mathbf{b} - \mathbf{a}) + \mathbf{a} \cdot (\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b}) \\ &= -\frac{1}{2}(\left|\mathbf{a}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathbf{b}\right|^{2}) + |\mathbf{a}|^2- \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} \\ &= \frac{1}{2} |\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b}|^2 \end{align*} as required. To show the other direction, consider Geometrically, these cases are equivalent, because together they both describe a circle of radius \(\left |\frac12 \left ( \mathbf{a} - \mathbf{b}\right) \right|\) in the plane halfway between \(\mathbf{a}\) and \(\mathbf{b}\)

1987 Paper 2 Q9
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

For any square matrix \(\mathbf{A}\) such that \(\mathbf{I-A}\) is non-singular (where \(\mathbf{I}\) is the unit matrix), the matrix \(\mathbf{B}\) is defined by \[ \mathbf{B}=(\mathbf{I+A})(\mathbf{I-A})^{-1}. \] Prove that \(\mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{T}}\mathbf{B}=\mathbf{I}\) if and only if \(\mathbf{A+A}^{\mathrm{T}}=\mathbf{O}\) (where \(\mathbf{O}\) is the zero matrix), explaining clearly each step of your proof. {[}You may quote standard results about matrices without proof.{]}


Solution: We use the following properties: \((\mathbf{AB})^T = \mathbf{B}^T\mathbf{A}^T\), \((\mathbf{AB})^{-1} = \mathbf{B}^{-1}\mathbf{A}^{-1}\), and \((\mathbf{A}^T)^{-1} = (\mathbf{A}^{-1})^T\) \begin{align*} &&\mathbf{I} &= \mathbf{B}^{\mathrm{T}}\mathbf{B} \\ \Leftrightarrow && {\mathbf{B}^{T}}^{-1} &= \mathbf{B} \\ \Leftrightarrow && (\mathbf{I+A})(\mathbf{I-A})^{-1} &= {((\mathbf{I+A})(\mathbf{I-A})^{-1})^{T}}^{-1} \\ &&&= {((\mathbf{I+A})(\mathbf{I-A})^{-1})^{-1}}^{T} \\ &&&= ((\mathbf{I-A})(\mathbf{I+A})^{-1})^{T} \\ &&&= {(\mathbf{I+A})^{-1}}^T(\mathbf{I-A})^T \\ &&&= {(\mathbf{I+A}^T)}^{-1}(\mathbf{I-A}^T) \\ \Leftrightarrow && (\mathbf{I+A}^T)(\mathbf{I+A}) &= (\mathbf{I-A}^T)(\mathbf{I-A}) \\ \Leftrightarrow && \mathbf{I}+\mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}^T+\mathbf{A}^T\mathbf{A} &= \mathbf{I}-\mathbf{A}-\mathbf{A}^T+\mathbf{A}^T\mathbf{A} \\ \Leftrightarrow && 2( \mathbf{A}^T+\mathbf{A}) &= \mathbf{O} \\ \Leftrightarrow && \mathbf{A}+\mathbf{A}^T &= \mathbf{O} \end{align*}

1987 Paper 2 Q10
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

The set \(S\) consists of \(N(>2)\) elements \(a_{1},a_{2},\ldots,a_{N}.\) \(S\) is acted upon by a binary operation \(\circ,\) defined by \[ a_{j}\circ a_{k}=a_{m}, \] where \(m\) is equal to the greater of \(j\) and \(k\). Determine, giving reasons, which of the four group axioms hold for \(S\) under \(\circ,\) and which do not. Determine also, giving reasons, which of the group axioms hold for \(S\) under \(*\), where \(*\) is defined by \[ a_{j}*a_{k}=a_{n}, \] where \(n=\left|j-k\right|+1\).


Solution:

  1. (Closure) This operation is clearly closed by construction
  2. (Associative) \(a_j \circ (a_k \circ a_l) = a_j \circ a_{\max(k,l)} = a_{\max(j,k,l)} = a_{\max(j,k)} \circ a_l = (a_j \circ a_k) \circ a_l\), so it is associative
  3. (Identity) \(a_1 \circ a_k = a_{\max(1,k)} = a_k = a_{\max(k,1)} = a_k \circ a_1\) so \(a_1\) is an identity.
  4. (Inverses) There is no inverse, since \(a_N \circ a_k = a_N\) for all \(k\), and hence \(a_N\) can have no inverse.
  1. (Closure) \(n = |j-k|+1 \geq 1\) so we need to show that \(n \leq N\) to ensure closure. This is true since the largest \(j-k\) can be is if \(j = N\) and \(k = 1\), and this also satisfies \(|j-k| + 1 \leq N\). Hence the operation is closed.
  2. (Associative) \(a_j * (a_k * a_l) = a_j * (a_{|k-l|+1}) = a_{|j-|k-l|-1|+1}\). \((a_j * a_k) * a_l = a_{|j-k|+1}*a_l = a_{|l-|j-k|-1|+1}\). \(a_2 * (a_2 * a_3) = a_2 * a_2 = a_1\). \((a_2 *a_2)*a_3 = a_1 * a_3 = a_3 \neq a_2\) therefore this isn't associative for any \(N > 2\)
  3. (Identity) \(a_1\) is an identity, since \(a_1 * a_k = a_{|k-1|+1} = a_{k-1+1} = a_k\).
  4. (Inverse) Every element is self-inverse since \(a_k * a_k = a_{|k-k|+1} = a_1\)

1987 Paper 2 Q11
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

A rough ring of radius \(a\) is fixed so that it lies in a plane inclined at an angle \(\alpha\) to the horizontal. A uniform heavy rod of length \(b(>a)\) has one end smoothly pivoted at the centre of the ring, so that the rod is free to move in any direction. It rests on the circumference of the ring, making an angle \(\theta\) with the radius to the highest point on the circumference. Find the relation between \(\alpha,\theta\) and the coefficient of friction, \(\mu,\) which must hold when the rod is in limiting equilibrium.


Solution:

TikZ diagram
It is important to define clear coordinate axes, so let the \(x\)-axis point up the line of greatest slope of the ring. The \(z\)-axis perpendicular to the ring, and the \(y\)-axis perpendicular to both of these. Our method is going to be to take moments about \(O\) to avoid worrying about the force at the pivot. There are \(3\) forces we need to worry about:
  • The mass of the rod
  • The reaction where it meets the ring
  • The friction at the ring
In our coordinate frame, the reaction will act in the \(z\)-direction, \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ R \end{pmatrix}\), the friction force will act in the \(x-y\) plane: \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \mu R \sin \theta \\ -\mu R \cos \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\). We don't know the mass, but we know it will be acting "vertically", so \(\cos \alpha\) of it will act in the \(z\)-axis and \(\sin \alpha\) will act in the \(y\)-axis, ie it will act parallel to \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \\ 0 \\ \cos \alpha \end{pmatrix}\). When taking moments, we need to consider \(\mathbf{r}\) the direction of the rod. This will be \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta \\ \sin \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\). The moment of the weight will all be parallel to \(\mathbf{r} \times \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \\ 0 \\ \cos \alpha \end{pmatrix}\). Similarly the moments of the contact forces will be \(\mathbf{r} \times \begin{pmatrix} \mu R \sin \theta \\ -\mu R \cos \theta \\ R \end{pmatrix}\). Since these moments sum to \(\mathbf{0}\) as we are in equilibrium, these vectors must be parallel. Therefore it is sufficient to check the vector triple product, \begin{align*} && 0 &= \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta \\ \sin \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \left ( \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \\ 0 \\ \cos \alpha \end{pmatrix} \times \begin{pmatrix} \mu \sin \theta \\ -\mu \cos \theta \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \right ) \\ &&&= \cos \theta (\mu \cos \theta \cos \alpha)-\sin \theta (\sin \alpha - \mu \sin \theta \cos \alpha) \\ &&&= \mu((\sin^2 \theta+\cos^2 \theta) \cos \alpha) -\sin \theta \sin \alpha \\ \Rightarrow && \mu &= \tan \alpha \sin \theta \end{align*}

1987 Paper 2 Q12
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

A long, inextensible string passes through a small fixed ring. One end of the string is attached to a particle of mass \(m,\) which hangs freely. The other end is attached to a bead also of mass \(m\) which is threaded on a smooth rigid wire fixed in the same vertical plane as the ring. The curve of the wire is such that the system can be in static equilibrium for all positions of the bead. The shortest distance between the wire and the ring is \(d(>0).\) Using plane polar coordinates centred on the ring, find the equation of the curve. The bead is set in motion. Assuming that the string remains taut, show that the speed of the bead when it is a distance \(r\) from the ring is \[ \left(\frac{r}{2r-d}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}v, \] where \(v\) is the speed of the bead when \(r=d.\)


Solution:

TikZ diagram
Assume the total length of the string is \(l\). Then the total energy of the system (when nothing is moving) for a given \(\theta\) is: \(mg(r-l) + mgr \sin \theta\) Since for a point in static equilibrium, the derivative of this must be \(0\), this must be constant. So: \(r\l \sin \theta + 1\r = C \Rightarrow r = \frac{C}{1+\sin \theta}\) \(r\) will be smallest when \(\sin \theta = 1\), ie in polar coordinates, the equation should be \(r = \frac{2d}{1+\sin \theta}\) Alternatively, by considering forces, the shape must be a parabola with the ring at the focus. Considering the bead, it will have speed of \(r \dot{\theta}\) tangentially, and \(-\dot{r}\). The other particle will have speed \(\dot{r}\). Differentiating wrt to \(t\) \begin{align*} && 0 &= \dot{r}(\sin \theta + 1) + r \dot{\theta} \cos \theta \\ \Rightarrow && \dot{\theta} &= \frac{-\dot{r}(1+\sin \theta)}{r \cos \theta} \\ &&&= \frac{-\dot{r} 2d}{r^2 \sqrt{1-\l \frac{2d}{r}-1\r^2}} \\ &&&= \frac{-2d\dot{r}}{r^2\sqrt{\frac{r^2-(2d-r)^2}{r^2}}} \\ &&&= \frac{-d\dot{r}}{r\sqrt{dr-d^2}} \end{align*} By conservation of energy (since GPE is constant throughout the system, KE must be constant): \begin{align*} && \frac12 m (r^2 \dot{\theta}^2+\dot{r}^2) +\frac12 m \dot{r}^2 &= \frac12mv^2 \\ \Rightarrow && v^2 &= r^2 \dot{\theta}^2 + 2\dot{r}^2 \\ &&&= r^2 \frac{d^2\dot{r}^2}{r^2(dr-d^2)} + 2\dot{r}^2 \\ &&&= \dot{r}^2 \l \frac{d }{r-d} + 2 \r \\ &&&= \dot{r}^2 \l \frac{2r-d}{r-d} \r \\ \Rightarrow && v &= \dot{r} \l \frac{2r-d}{r-d} \r^{\frac12} \\ \Rightarrow && \dot{r} &= \l \frac{r-d}{2r-d} \r^{\frac12} v \\ \Rightarrow && u^2 &= r^2 \dot{\theta}^2+\dot{r}^2\\ &&&= \dot{r}^2 \l \frac{d }{r-d} + 1 \r \\ &&&= \l \frac{r-d}{2r-d} \r \l \frac{r}{r-d} \r v^2 \\ &&&= \l \frac{d}{2r-d} \r v^2 \\ \Rightarrow && u &= \l \frac{d}{2r-d} \r^{\frac12} v \end{align*}

1987 Paper 2 Q13
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

Ice snooker is played on a rectangular horizontal table, of length \(L\) and width \(B\), on which a small disc (the puck) slides without friction. The table is bounded by smooth vertical walls (the cushions) and the coefficient of restitution between the puck and any cushion is \(e\). If the puck is hit so that it bounces off two adjacent cushions, show that its final path (after two bounces) is parallel to its original path. The puck rests against the cushion at a point which divides the side of length \(L\) in the ratio \(z:1\). Show that it is possible, whatever \(z\), to hit the puck so that it bounces off the three other cushions in succession clockwise and returns to the spot at which it started. By considering these paths as \(z\) varies, explain briefly why there are two different ways in which, starting at any point away from the cushions, it is possible to perform a shot in which the puck bounces off all four cushions in succession clockwise and returns to its starting point.


Solution:

TikZ diagram
The puck sets off at some velocity \(\displaystyle \binom{u_x}{u_y}\), after the first bounce off the wall parallel to the \(y\)-axis, it has velocity \(\displaystyle \binom{-eu_x}{u_y}\). After it bounces off the wall parallel to the \(x\)-axis, it has velocity \(\displaystyle \binom{-eu_x}{-eu_y}\) which is clearly parallel to the original velocity.
TikZ diagram
If the puck bounces off 3 walls and returns to the same point the shape formed must be a parallelogram. We need to hit the point on the opposite side which is in a ratio of \(1:z\), but this must be possible if we aim towards the side further away.
TikZ diagram
For a fixed path, as \(z\) increases we generate more parallelograms which cross ours (on two of the legs) twice. As they move the full length it will cover the full leg of the parallogram. Similarly going the other way will cover the other leg of the parallelogram. Therefore from every point there are two circuits round the table

1987 Paper 2 Q14
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

A thin uniform elastic band of mass \(m,\) length \(l\) and modulus of elasticity \(\lambda\) is pushed on to a smooth circular cone of vertex angle \(2\alpha,\) in such a way that all elements of the band are the same distance from the vertex. It is then released from rest. Let \(x(t)\) be the length of the band at time \(t\) after release, and let \(t_{0}\) be the time at which the band becomes slack. Assuming that a small element of the band which subtends an angle \(\delta\theta\) at the axis of the cone experiences a force, due to the tension \(T\) in the band, of magnitude \(T\delta\theta\) directed towards the axis, and ignoring the effects of gravity, show that \[ \frac{\mathrm{d}^{2}x}{\mathrm{d}t^{2}}+\frac{4\pi^{2}\lambda}{ml}(x-l)\sin^{2}\alpha=0,\qquad(0< t< t_{0}). \] Find the value of \(t_{0}.\)


Solution:

TikZ diagram
\begin{align*} \text{N2}(\nwarrow): && T\delta \theta \sin \alpha &= -m\frac{\delta \theta}{2\pi} \ddot{d} \end{align*} Notice that \(r = d \sin \alpha\) and \(x = 2 \pi r\), so \(x = 2\pi d \sin \alpha\) and \(\ddot{x} = 2\pi \sin \alpha \ddot{d} \Rightarrow \ddot{d} = \ddot{x} \frac{1}{2 \pi \sin \alpha}\) Notice also that \(T = \frac{\lambda}{l}(x-l)\) so. \begin{align*} && \frac{m}{4 \pi^2 \sin\alpha} \ddot{x} &= -\frac{\lambda}{l}(x-l) \sin\alpha \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\mathrm{d}^{2}x}{\mathrm{d}t^{2}}+\frac{4\pi^{2}\lambda}{ml}(x-l)\sin^{2}\alpha&=0 \end{align*} The solution to the differential equation we have is: \begin{align*} && x(t) &= A \sin \left (\sqrt{\frac{4 \pi^2 \lambda}{ml}\sin^2 \alpha} \cdot t \right) + B \sin \left (\sqrt{\frac{4 \pi^2 \lambda}{ml}\sin^2 \alpha} \cdot t \right) + l \\ &&&= A \sin \left (2 \pi \sin \alpha\sqrt{\frac{ \lambda}{ml}} \cdot t \right) +B \sin \left (2 \pi \sin \alpha\sqrt{\frac{ \lambda}{ml}} \cdot t \right) + l\\ && \dot{x}(0) = 0 \\ \Rightarrow && B &= 0 \\ && x(t) &= (x(0)-l) \sin \left (2 \pi \sin \alpha\sqrt{\frac{ \lambda}{ml}} \cdot t \right) + l \\ && x(t_0) &= l \\ \Rightarrow && t_0 &= \frac{1}{4\sin \alpha} \sqrt{\frac{ml}{\lambda}} \end{align*}