48 problems found
Show that setting \(z - z^{-1}=w\) in the quartic equation \[ z^4 +5z^3 +4z^2 -5z +1=0 \] results in the quadratic equation \(w^2+5w+6=0\). Hence solve the above quartic equation. Solve similarly the equation \[ 2z^8 -3z^7-12z^6 +12z^5 +22z^4-12z^3 -12 z^2 +3z +2=0 \;. \]
Solution: \begin{align*} && 0 &= z^4 +5z^3 +4z^2 -5z +1 \\ &&0 &= z^2 + z^{-2} + 5(z-z^{-1}) + 4 \\ &&&= (z-z^{-1})^2+2+5(z-z^{-1})+4 \\ &&&= w^2 + 5w + 6 \\ &&&= (w+3)(w+2) \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= z-z^{-1}+3 \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= z^2+3z-1 \\ \Rightarrow && z &= \frac{-3 \pm \sqrt{3^2+4}}{2} = \frac{-3 \pm \sqrt{13}}{2} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= z-z^{-1}+2 \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= z^2+2z-1 \\ \Rightarrow && z &= \frac{-2 \pm \sqrt{2^2+4}}{2} = - 1 \pm \sqrt{2} \\ \end{align*} \begin{align*} &&0 &= 2z^8 -3z^7-12z^6 +12z^5 +22z^4-12z^3 -12 z^2 +3z +2 \\ && 0 &= 2(z^4+z^{-4}) - 3(z^3-z^{-3})-12(z^2+z^{-2})+12(z-z^{-1})+22 \\ &&&= 2\left ((z-z^{-1})^4+4(z^2+z^{-2})-6\right)-3 \left ((z-z^{-1})^3+3(z-z^{-1}) \right)-12 \left ((z-z^{-1})^2+2 \right)+12(z-z^{-1})+22 \\ &&&= 2(w^4+4(w^2+2)-6)-3w^3-9w-12w^2-24+12w+22 \\ &&&= 2 w^4-3w^3-4w^2+3w+2 \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= 2(w^2+w^{-2})-3(w-w^{-1})-4 \\ &&&= 2((w-w^{-1})^2+2)-3(w-w^{-1})-4 \\ &&&= 2x^2-3x \\ &&&= x(2x-3) \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= w -w^{-1} \\ \Rightarrow && w &= \pm 1 \\ \Rightarrow && \pm 1 &= z-z^{-1} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= z^2 \mp z-1 \\ \Rightarrow && z &= \frac{\pm 1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2} \\ \Rightarrow && \frac32 &= w-w^{-1} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= 2w^2-3w -2 \\ &&&= (2w+1)(w-2) \\ \Rightarrow && 2 &= z-z^{-1} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= z^2-2z-1 \\ \Rightarrow && z &= 1 \pm \sqrt{2} \\ \Rightarrow && -\frac12 &= z-z^{-1} \\ \Rightarrow && 0 &= 2z^2+z-2 \\ \Rightarrow && z &= \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{17}}{4} \\ \Rightarrow && z &\in \left \{ \frac{\pm 1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2}, 1 \pm \sqrt{2}, \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{17}}{4} \right \} \end{align*}
Sketch, without calculating the stationary points, the graph of the function \(\f(x)\) given by \[ \f(x) = (x-p)(x-q)(x-r)\;, \] where \(p < q < r\). By considering the quadratic equation \(\f'(x)=0\), or otherwise, show that \[ (p+q+r)^2 > 3(qr+rp+pq)\;. \] By considering \((x^2+gx+h)(x-k)\), or otherwise, show that \(g^2>4h\,\) is a sufficient condition but not a necessary condition for the inequality \[ (g-k)^2>3(h-gk) \] to hold.
Solution:
Consider the equation \[ x^2 - b x + c = 0 \;, \] where \(b\) and \(c\) are real numbers.
Given that \[ x^4 + p x^2 + q x + r = ( x^2 - a x + b ) ( x^2 + a x + c ) , \] express \(p\), \(q\) and \(r\) in terms of \(a\), \(b\) and \(c\). Show also that \( a^2\) is a root of the cubic equation $$ u^3 + 2 p u^2 + ( p^2 - 4 r ) u - q^2 = 0 . $$ Explain why this equation always has a non-negative root, and verify that \(u = 9\) is a root in the case \(p = -1\), \(q = -6\), \(r = 15\) . Hence, or otherwise, express $$y^4 - 8 y^3 + 23 y^2 - 34 y + 39$$ as a product of two quadratic factors.
Solution: \begin{align*} && ( x^2 - a x + b ) ( x^2 + a x + c ) &= x^4 + (b+c-a^2)x^2 + a(b-c)x + bc \\ \Rightarrow && x^4 + p x^2 + q x + r &= x^4 + (b+c-a^2)x^2 + a(b-c)x + bc \\ \Rightarrow && p &= b+c-a^2 \tag{1}\\ && q &= a(b-c) \tag{2}\\ && r &= bc \tag{3} \end{align*} \begin{align*} (1): && p+a^2 &= b+ c \\ (2): && \frac{q}{a} &= b - c \\ \Rightarrow && b &= \frac12 (p+a^2 + \frac{q}{a}) \\ && c &= \frac12 (p+a^2 - \frac{q}{a}) \\ (3): && r &= \frac12 (p+a^2 + \frac{q}{a}) \frac12 (p+a^2 - \frac{q}{a}) \\ \Rightarrow && 4ra^2 &= (pa + a^3 + q)(pa+a^3-q) \\ &&&= (pa+a^3)^2 - q^2 \\ &&&= a^2(p+a^2)^2 -q^2 \\ &&&= a^2(p^2 + 2pa^2 + a^4) - q^2 \\ &&&= pa^2 + 2pa^4 + a^6 - q^2 \\ \end{align*} Therefore \(a^2\) is a root of \(u^3 + 2pu^2 + pu - q^2 = 4ru\), ie the given equation. When \(u = 0\), this equation is \(-q^2\), therefore the cubic is negative. But as \(u \to \infty\) the cubic tends to \(\infty\), therefore it must cross the \(x\)-axis and have a positive root. If \(p=-1, q = -6, r = 15\) then the cubic is: \(u^3 - 2u^2 + (1-60)u -36\) and so when \(u = 9\) we have \begin{align*} 9^3 - 2\cdot 9^2 -59 \cdot 9 -36 &= 9(9^2-2\cdot 9 - 29 -4) \\ &= 9(81 -18-59-4) \\ &= 0 \end{align*} so \(u = 9\) is a root Let \(y=z + 2\) \begin{align*} &&y^4 - 8 y^3 + 23 y^2 - 34 y + 39 &= (z+2)^4-8(z+2)^3 + 23(z+2)^2 - 34(z+2) + 39 \\ &&&= z^4+8z^3+24z^2+32z+16 - \\ &&&\quad -8z^3-48z^2-96z-64 \\ &&&\quad\quad +23z^2+92z+92 \\ &&&\quad\quad -34z-68 + 39 \\ &&&= z^4-z^2-6z+15 \end{align*} So conveniently this is \(p = -1, q = -6, r = 15\), so we know that \(a = 3\) is a sensible thing to true. \(b = \frac12(-1 + 9 + \frac{-6}{3}) = 3\) \(c = \frac12(-1+9-\frac{-6}{3}) = 5\) so \begin{align*} && z^4-z^2-6z+15 &= (z^2-3z+3)(z^2+3z+5) \\ &&y^4 - 8 y^3 + 23 y^2 - 34 y + 39 &= ((y-2)^2-3(y-2)+3)((y-2)^2+3(y-2)+5) \\ &&&= (y^2-4y+4-3y+6+3)(y^2-4y+4+3y-6+5) \\ &&&= (y^2-7y+13)(y^2-y+3) \end{align*}
Consider the cubic equation \[ x^3-px^2+qx-r=0\;, \] where \(p\ne0\) and \(r\ne 0\).
Solution:
Define the modulus of a complex number \(z\) and give the geometric interpretation of \(\vert\,z_1-z_2\,\vert\) for two complex numbers \(z_1\) and \(z_2\). On the basis of this interpretation establish the inequality $$\vert\,z_1+z_2\,\vert\le \vert\,z_1\,\vert+\vert\,z_2\,\vert.$$ Use this result to prove, by induction, the corresponding inequality for \(\vert\,z_1+\cdots+z_n\,\vert\). The complex numbers \(a_1,\,a_2,\,\ldots,\,a_n\) satisfy \(|a_i|\le 3\) (\(i=1, 2, \ldots , n\)). Prove that the equation $$a_1z+a_2z^2\cdots +a_nz^n=1$$ has no solution \(z\) with \(\vert\,z\,\vert\le 1/4\).
Solution: Suppose \(z = a+ib\), where \(a,b \in \mathbb{R}\) then the modulus of \(z\), \(|z| = \sqrt{a^2+b^2}\). Noting the similarity to the Pythagorean theorem, we can say that \(|z_1 - z_2|\) is the distance between \(z_1\) and \(z_2\) in the Argand diagram. \begin{align*} |z_1 + z_2| &= |(z_1 - 0) + (0 -z_2)| \\ &\underbrace{\leq}_{\text{the direct distance is shorter than going via }0} |z_1 - 0| + |0 - z_2| \\ &= |z_1| + |-z_2| \\ &= |z_1| + |z_2| \end{align*} Claim: \(\displaystyle \vert\,z_1+\cdots+z_n\,\vert \leq \sum_{i=1}^n |z_i|\) Proof: (By Induction) Base Case: \(n = 1, 2\) have been proven. Inductive step, suppose it is true for \(n = k\), then consider \(n = k+1\), ie \begin{align*} \vert\,z_1+\cdots+z_k+z_{k+1}\,\vert &\leq \vert\,z_1+\cdots+z_k\vert + \vert z_{k+1}\,\vert \\ &\underbrace{\leq}_{\text{inductive hypothesis}} \sum_{i=1}^k |z_i| + |z_{k+1}| \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^{k+1} |z_i| \end{align*} Therefore if our hypothesis is true for \(n = k\) it is true for \(n = k+1\), and so since it is true for \(n = 1\) it is true by the principle of mathematical induction for all integers \(n \geq 1\). Suppose \(|z| \leq 1/4\), then consider: \begin{align*} \vert a_1z+a_2z^2+\cdots +a_nz^n \vert &\leq \vert a_1 z\vert + \vert a_2z^2\vert + \cdots + \vert a_n z_n\ \vert \\ &= \vert a_1\vert\vert z\vert + \vert a_2\vert\vert z^2\vert + \cdots + \vert a_n\vert\vert z^n\ \vert \\ &\leq 3\left ( |z| + |z|^2 + \cdots + |z|^n \right) \\ &\leq 3 \left ( \frac{1}{4} + \frac1{4^2} + \cdots + \frac{1}{4^n} \right) \\ &< 3 \frac{1/4}{1-1/4} \\ &= 1 \end{align*} Therefore we cannot have equality and there are no solutions.
In this question, you may assume that if \(k_1,\dots,k_n\) are distinct positive real numbers, then \[\frac1n\sum_{r=1}^nk_r>\left({\prod\limits_{r=1}^n} k_r\right )^{\!\! \frac1n},\] i.e. their arithmetic mean is greater than their geometric mean. Suppose that \(a\), \(b\), \(c\) and \(d\) are positive real numbers such that the polynomial \[{\rm f}(x)=x^4-4ax^3+6b^2x^2-4c^3x+d^4\] has four distinct positive roots.
Solution:
Show, using de Moivre's theorem, or otherwise, that \[ \tan7\theta=\frac{t(t^{6}-21t^{4}+35t^{2}-7)}{7t^{6}-35t^{4}+21t^{2}-1}\,, \] where \(t=\tan\theta.\)
Solution:
If \(z=x+\mathrm{i}y\) where \(x\) and \(y\) are real, define \(\left|z\right|\) in terms of \(x\) and \(y\). Show, using your definition, that if \(z_{1},z_{2}\in\mathbb{C}\) then \(\left|z_{1}z_{2}\right|=\left|z_{1}\right|\left|z_{2}\right|.\) Explain, by means of a diagram, or otherwise, why \(\left|z_{1}+z_{2}\right|\leqslant\left|z_{1}\right|+\left|z_{2}\right|.\) Suppose that \(a_{j}\in\mathbb{C}\) and \(\left|a_{j}\right|\leqslant1\) for \(j=1,2,\ldots,n.\) Show that, if \(\left|z\right|\leqslant\frac{1}{2},\) then \[ \left|a_{n}z^{n}+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+\cdots+a_{1}z\right|<1, \] and deduce that any root \(w\) of the equation \[ a_{n}z^{n}+a_{n-1}z^{n-1}+\cdots+a_{1}z+1=0 \] must satisfy \(\left|x\right|>\frac{1}{2}.\)
The cubic equation \[ x^{3}-px^{2}+qx-r=0 \] has roots \(a,b\) and \(c\). Express \(p,q\) and \(r\) in terms of \(a,b\) and \(c\).
Solution: \(p = a+b+c, q = ab+bc+ca, r = abc\)
Show that \[ \sin(2n+1)\theta=\sin^{2n+1}\theta\sum_{r=0}^{n}(-1)^{n-r}\binom{2n+1}{2r}\cot^{2r}\theta, \] where \(n\) is a positive integer. Deduce that the equation \[ \sum_{r=0}^{n}(-1)^{r}\binom{2n+1}{2r}x^{r}=0 \] has roots \(\cot^{2}(k\pi/(2n+1))\) for \(k=1,2,\ldots,n\). Show that
The equation \[ x^{n}-qx^{n-1}+r=0, \] where \(n\geqslant5\) and \(q\) and \(r\) are real constants, has roots \(\alpha_{1},\alpha_{2},\ldots,\alpha_{n}.\) The sum of the products of \(m\) distinct roots is denoted by \(\Sigma_{m}\) (so that, for example, \(\Sigma_{3}=\sum\alpha_{i}\alpha_{j}\alpha_{k}\) where the sum runs over the values of \(i,j\) and \(k\) with \(n\geqslant i>j>k\geqslant1\)). The sum of \(m\)th powers of the roots is denoted by \(S_{m}\) (so that, for example, \(S_{3}=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\alpha_{i}^{3}\)). Prove that \(S_{p}=q^{p}\) for \(1\leqslant p\leqslant n-1.\) You may assume that for any \(n\)th degree equation and \(1\leqslant p\leqslant n\) \[ S_{p}-S_{p-1}\Sigma_{1}+S_{p-2}\Sigma_{2}-\cdots+(-1)^{p-1}S_{1}\Sigma_{p-1}+(-1)^{p}p\Sigma_{p}=0.] \] Find expressions for \(S_{n},\) \(S_{n+1}\) and \(S_{n+2}\) in terms of \(q,r\) and \(n\). Suggest an expression for \(S_{n+m},\) where \(m < n\), and prove its validity by induction.
Solution: Claim: \(S_p = q^p\) for \(1 \leq p \leq n-1\) Proof: When \(p = 1\), \(S_p = \Sigma_1 = q\) as expected. Note that \(\Sigma_i = 0\) for \(i = 2, \cdots, n-1\). Using \(S_p = S_{p-1}\Sigma_{1}-S_{p-2}\Sigma_{2}+\cdots+(-1)^{p-1+1}S_{1}\Sigma_{p-1}+(-1)^{p+1}p\Sigma_{p}\), we can see that \(S_p = qS_{p-q}\) when \(1 \leq p \leq n-1\), ie \(S_p = q^p\). Note that \begin{align*} S_n &= \sum \alpha_i^n \\ &= q\sum \alpha_i^{n-1} - \sum r \\ &= qS_{n-1} - nr \\ &= q^n - nr \\ \\ S_{n+1} &= \sum \alpha_i^{n+1} \\ &= q \sum \alpha_i^{n} - r \sum \alpha_i \\ &= q^{n+1} - rq \\ \\ S_{n+2} &= \sum \alpha_i^{n+2} \\ &= q \sum \alpha_i^{n+1} - r \sum \alpha_i^2 \\ &= q^{n+2} - rq^2 \\ \end{align*} Claim: \(S_{n+m} = q^{n+m} - rq^{m}\) Proof: The obvious
Show, using de Moivre's theorem, or otherwise, that \[ \tan9\theta=\frac{t(t^{2}-3)(t^{6}-33t^{4}+27t^{2}-3)}{(3t^{2}-1)(3t^{6}-27t^{4}+33t^{2}-1)},\qquad\mbox{ where }t=\tan\theta. \] By considering the equation \(\tan9\theta=0,\) or otherwise, obtain a cubic equation with integer coefficients whose roots are \[ \tan^{2}\left(\frac{\pi}{9}\right),\qquad\tan^{2}\left(\frac{2\pi}{9}\right)\qquad\mbox{ and }\qquad\tan^{2}\left(\frac{4\pi}{9}\right). \] Deduce the value of \[ \tan\left(\frac{\pi}{9}\right)\tan\left(\frac{2\pi}{9}\right)\tan\left(\frac{4\pi}{9}\right). \] Show that \[ \tan^{6}\left(\frac{\pi}{9}\right)+\tan^{6}\left(\frac{2\pi}{9}\right)+\tan^{6}\left(\frac{4\pi}{9}\right)=33273. \]
Solution: Writing \(c = \cos \theta, s = \sin \theta\) then de Moivre states that: \begin{align*} && \cos 9 \theta + i \sin 9 \theta &= (c +i s)^9 \\ &&&= c^9 + 9ic^8s - 36c^7s^2-84ic^6s^3+126c^5s^4 + 126ic^4s^5 -84c^3s^6 -36ic^2s^7+9cs^8+is^9 \\ &&&= (c^9-36c^7s^2+126c^5s^3-84c^3s^6+8cs^8)+i(9c^8s-75c^6s^3+126c^4s^5-36c^2s^7+s^9) \\ \Rightarrow && \tan 9\theta &= \frac{(9c^8s-75c^6s^3+126c^4s^5-36s^2c^7+s^9)}{(c^9-36c^7s^2+126c^5s^4-84c^3s^6+8cs^8)} \\ &&&= \frac{9t-75t^3+126s^5-36t^7+t^9}{1-36t^2+126t^4-84t^6+8t^8} \\ &&&= \frac{t(t^{2}-3)(t^{6}-33t^{4}+27t^{2}-3)}{(3t^{2}-1)(3t^{6}-27t^{4}+33t^{2}-1)} \end{align*} If we consider \(\tan 9\theta = 0\) it will have the roots \(\theta = \frac{n \pi}{9}, n \in \mathbb{Z}\), in particular, the numerator of our fraction for \(\tan 9 \theta\) will be zero for \(t = 0, \tan \frac{\pi}{9}, \tan \frac{2\pi}{9}, \tan \frac{3\pi}{9}, \tan \frac{4 \pi}{9}, \tan \frac{5\pi}{9}, \tan \frac{6 \pi}{9}, \tan \frac{7 \pi}{9}, \tan \frac{8\pi}{9}\). It's worth noting all other values of \(\theta\) will repeat these values. Also note that \(0,\tan \frac{\pi}{3}, \tan \frac{2\pi}{3}\) are the roots of \(t\) and \(t^2-3\) respectively. Therefore the other values are the roots of our sextic. However, also note that \(\tan \frac{8\pi}{9} = - \tan \frac{\pi}{9}\) and similar, therefore we can notice that all the roots in pairs can be mapped to \(\tan \frac{\pi}{9}, \tan \frac{2 \pi}{9}\) and \(\tan \frac{4 \pi}{9}\) and all those values are squared, so the roots of: \(x^3 - 33x^2+27x-3\) will be \(\tan^2 \frac{\pi}{9}, \tan^2 \frac{2 \pi}{9}\) and \(\tan^2 \frac{4 \pi}{9}\). The product of the roots will be \(3\), so \begin{align*} && \tan^2 \frac{\pi}{9} \tan^2 \frac{2 \pi}{9} \tan^2 \frac{4 \pi}{9} &= 3 \\ \Rightarrow && \tan \frac{\pi}{9} \tan \frac{2 \pi}{9} \tan \frac{4 \pi}{9} &= \pm \sqrt{3} \\ \underbrace{\Rightarrow}_{\text{all positive}} && \tan \frac{\pi}{9} \tan \frac{2 \pi}{9} \tan \frac{4 \pi}{9} &= \sqrt{3} \\ \end{align*} Notice that \(x^3 + y^3 +z^3 - 3xyz = (x+y+z)((x+y+z)^2-3(xy+yz+zx))\) Therefore \begin{align*} \tan^{6}\left(\frac{\pi}{9}\right)+\tan^{6}\left(\frac{2\pi}{9}\right)+\tan^{6}\left(\frac{4\pi}{9}\right) &= 33(33^2-3\cdot27) + 3 \cdot 3 \\ &= 33\,273 \end{align*}
By using de Moivre's theorem, or otherwise, show that
Solution: Given that \(e^{i \theta} = \cos \theta + i \sin \theta\) we must have that