Problems

Filters
Clear Filters

22 problems found

2001 Paper 2 Q10
D: 1600.0 B: 1486.3
momentum collisions coefficient of restitution wall rebound inequality kinetic energy two-particle collision smooth horizontal surface

Two particles \(A\) and \(B\) of masses \(m\) and \(km\), respectively, are at rest on a smooth horizontal surface. The direction of the line passing through \(A\) and \(B\) is perpendicular to a vertical wall which is on the other side of \(B\) from \(A\). The particle \(A\) is now set in motion towards \(B\) with speed \(u\). The coefficient of restitution between \(A\) and \(B\) is \(e_1\) and between \(B\) and the wall is \(e_2\). Show that there will be a second collision between \(A\) and \(B\) provided $$ k< \frac {1+e_2(1+e_1)} {e_1}\;. $$ Show that, if \(e_1=\frac13\), \(e_2=\frac12\) and \(k<5\), then the kinetic energy of \(A\) and \(B\) immediately after \(B\) rebounds from the wall is greater than \(mu^2/27\).

Solution: First collision:

TikZ diagram
Since the \(e = e_1\), the speed of approach is \(u\) the speed of separation will be \(e_1u\) and so \(v_B = v_A + e_1u\). \begin{align*} \text{COM}: && mu &= mv_A + km(v_A + e_1u) \\ \Rightarrow && v_A(1+k) &= u(1-ke_1) \\ \Rightarrow && v_A &= \frac{1-ke_1}{1+k} u \\ && v_B &= \frac{1-ke_1}{1+k} u + e_1 u \\ &&&= \frac{1-ke_1 + e_1+ke_1}{1+k}u \\ &&&= \frac{1+e_1}{1+k}u \end{align*} Once the ball rebounds from the wall it will have velocity (still taking towards the wall as +ve) of \(-\frac{1+e_1}{1+k}e_2u\). There will be another collision if it is travelling faster than \(A\), ie if: \begin{align*} -\frac{1+e_1}{1+k}e_2u &< \frac{1-ke_1}{1+k} u \\ \Leftrightarrow && 0 &< (1-ke_1) + (1+e_1)e_2 \\ \Leftrightarrow && ke_1 &< 1 +e_2 (1+e_1) \\ \Leftrightarrow && k &< \frac{1 +e_2 (1+e_1)}{e_1} \\ \end{align*} If \(e_1 = \frac13, e_2 = \frac12\), then \(v_A = \frac{1-\frac13k}{1+k}u = \frac{3-k}{3(1+k)}u\) and \(v_B = \frac{4}{3(1+k)}u\). Therefore \begin{align*} && \text{total k.e.} &= \underbrace{\frac12 m v_A^2}_{\text{k.e. of }A} + \underbrace{\frac12 (km) (e_2 v_B)^2}_{\text{k.e. of }B} \\ &&&= \frac12 m \frac{(3-k)^2}{9(1+k)^2}u^2 + \frac12 km \frac14 \frac{16}{9(1+k)^2}u^2 \\ &&&= \frac12mu^2 \frac{1}{9(1+k)^2}\left ( (3-k)^2+4k \right) \\ &&&= \frac12mu^2 \frac{1}{9(1+k)^2}\left ( 9-2k+k^2 \right) \\ &&&= \frac{mu^2}{18} \frac{9-2k+k^2}{1+2k+k^2} \end{align*} We wish to minimize this as a function of \(k\). \begin{align*} \frac{\d}{\d k} \left ( \frac{9-2k+k^2}{1+2k+k^2}\right) &= \frac{(1+k)^2(2k-2)-2(1+k)(k^2-2k+9)}{(1+k)^4} \\ &= \frac{2(k^2-1) - 2(k^2-2k+9)}{(1+k)^3} \\ &= \frac{2(2k-10)}{(1+k)^3} \end{align*} Therefore the minimum will be when \(k = 5\) can't be a maximum by considering \(k \to 0\). This value is \(\frac{2}{3}\) and therefore \(\frac{mu^2}{18} \frac{2}{3} = \frac{mu^2}{27}\) is the smallest energy (which isn't quite achievable since \(k < 5\).

View
2000 Paper 1 Q10
D: 1516.0 B: 1500.0
momentum collisions coefficient of restitution conservation of momentum inequality energy optimisation three particles

Three particles \(P_1\), \(P_2\) and \(P_3\) of masses \(m_{1}\), \(m_{2}\) and \(m_{3}\) respectively lie at rest in a straight line on a smooth horizontal table. \(P_1\) is projected with speed \(v\) towards \(P_2\) and brought to rest by the collision. After \(P_2\) collides with \(P_3\), the latter moves forward with speed \(v\). The coefficients of restitution in the first and second collisions are \(e\) and \(e'\), respectively. Show that \[ e'= \frac{m_{2}+m_{3}-m_{1}}{m_{1}}. \] Show that \(2m_1\ge m_2 +m_3\ge m_1\) for such collisions to be possible. If \(m_1\), \(m_3\) and \(v\) are fixed, find, in terms of \(m_1\), \(m_3\) and \(v\), the largest and smallest possible values for the final energy of the system.

View
1999 Paper 2 Q10
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0
momentum collisions coefficient of restitution kinetic energy geometric series multiple collisions gravity-free space sequential impacts

\(N\) particles \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(P_3\), \(\ldots\), \(P_N\) with masses \(m\), \(qm\), \(q^2m\), \(\ldots\) , \({q^{N-1}}m\), respectively, are at rest at distinct points along a straight line in gravity-free space. The particle \(P_1\) is set in motion towards \(P_2\) with velocity \(V\) and in every subsequent impact the coefficient of restitution is \(e\), where \(0 < e < 1\). Show that after the first impact the velocities of \(P_1\) and \(P_2\) are $$ {\left({{1-eq}\over{1+q}}\right)}V \mbox{ \ \ \ and \ \ \ } {\left({{1+e}\over{1+q}}\right)}V, $$ respectively. Show that if \(q \le e\), then there are exactly \(N-1\) impacts and that if \(q=e\), then the total loss of kinetic energy after all impacts have occurred is equal to $$ {1\over 2}{me}{\left(1-e^{N-1}\right)}{V^2}. $$

View
1995 Paper 2 Q10
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.0
momentum collisions coefficient of restitution three particles sequential collisions inequality conservation of momentum change of reference frame

Three small spheres of masses \(m_{1},m_{2}\) and \(m_{3},\) move in a straight line on a smooth horizontal table. (Their order on the straight line is the order given.) The coefficient of restitution between any two spheres is \(e\). The first moves with velocity \(u\) towards the second whilst the second and third are at rest. After the first collision the second sphere hits the third after which the velocity of the second sphere is \(u.\) Find \(m_{1}\) in terms of \(m_{2},m_{3}\) and \(e\). deduce that \[ m_{2}e>m_{3}(1+e+e^{2}). \] Suppose that the relation between \(m_{1},m_{2}\) and \(m_{3}\) is that in the formula you found above, but that now the first sphere initially moves with velocity \(u\) and the other two spheres with velocity \(v\), all in the same direction along the line. If \(u>v>0\) use the first part to find the velocity of the second sphere after two collisions have taken place. (You should not need to make any substantial computations but you should state your argument clearly.)

View
1992 Paper 2 Q13
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.0
momentum collisions friction inextensible string coefficient of restitution energy conservation Newtons second law particle on table connected particles

Two particles \(P_{1}\) and \(P_{2}\), each of mass \(m\), are joined by a light smooth inextensible string of length \(\ell.\) \(P_{1}\) lies on a table top a distance \(d\) from the edge, and \(P_{2}\) hangs over the edge of the table and is suspended a distance \(b\) above the ground. The coefficient of friction between \(P_{1}\) and the table top is \(\mu,\) and \(\mu<1\). The system is released from rest. Show that \(P_{1}\) will fall off the edge of the table if and only if \[ \mu<\frac{b}{2d-b}. \] Suppose that \(\mu>b/(2d-b)\) , so that \(P_{1}\) comes to rest on the table, and that the coefficient of restitution between \(P_{2}\) and the floor is \(e\). Show that, if \(e>1/(2\mu),\) then \(P_{1}\) comes to rest before \(P_{2}\) bounces a second time.

View
1990 Paper 2 Q14
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.0
momentum collisions elastic collision Newton's experimental law chain of collisions conservation of energy conservation of momentum inequality

The identical uniform smooth spherical marbles \(A_{1},A_{2},\ldots,A_{n},\) where \(n\geqslant3,\) each of mass \(m,\) lie in that order in a smooth straight trough, with each marble touching the next. The marble \(A_{n+1},\) which is similar to \(A_{n}\) but has mass \(\lambda m,\) is placed in the trough so that it touches \(A_{n}.\) Another marble \(A_{0},\) identical to \(A_{n},\) slides along the trough with speed \(u\) and hits \(A_{1}.\) It is given that kinetic energy is conserved throughout.

  1. Show that if \(\lambda<1,\) there is a possible subsequent motion in which only \(A_{n}\) and \(A_{n+1}\) move (and \(A_{0}\) is reduced to rest), but that if \(\lambda>1,\) such a motion is not possible.
  2. If \(\lambda>1,\) show that a subsequent motion in which only \(A_{n-1},A_{n}\) and \(A_{n+1}\) move is not possible.
  3. If \(\lambda>1,\) find a possible subsequent motion in which only two marbles move.

Solution: Without loss of generality, let \(m = u = 1\).

  1. \begin{align*} \text{COM}: && 1&= v_n + \lambda v_{n+1} \\ && &= v_n + \lambda v_{n+1}\\ \text{COE}: && \frac12 &= \frac12 v_n^2 + \frac12 \lambda v_{n+1}^2 \\ && 1 &= v_n^2 +\lambda v_{n+1}^2 \\ \\ \Rightarrow && v_n^2 + 2\lambda v_n v_{n+1} + \lambda^2 v_{n+1}^2 &= v_n^2 + \lambda v_{n+1}^2 \\ && \lambda v_{n+1}^2 &= v_{n+1}^2 - 2 v_n v_{n+1} \\ && \lambda v_{n+1} &= (v_{n+1} - 2v_n) \\ && (1-\lambda)v_{n+1} &= 2v_n \end{align*} Since \(v_{n+1} > v_n > 0\) this is only possible if \(\lambda < 1\)
  2. \begin{align*} \text{COM}: && 1&= v_{n-1}+v_n+\lambda v_{n+1} \\ && 1&= v_{n-1} + v_n + \lambda v_{n+1} \\ \text{COE}: && \frac12 &= \frac12 v_{n-1}^2+\frac12v_n^2+\frac12\lambda v_{n+1}^2 \\ && 1&= v_{n-1}^2 + v_n^2 + \lambda v_{n+1}^2 \\ \\ \Rightarrow && 1 &= v_{n-1}^2 + v_n^2 + \lambda \frac{(1-v_{n-1}-v_n)^2}{\lambda^2} \\ &&&= v_{n-1}^2 + v_n^2 + \frac{(1-v_{n-1}-v_n)^2}{\lambda} \\ \Rightarrow && 1 &< v_{n-1}^2 + v_n^2 + (1-v_{n-1}-v_n)^2 \\ &&&= 2v_{n-1}^2+2v_n^2 + 1-2v_{n-1}-2v_{n-2} +2v_{n-1}v_n\\ \Rightarrow && v_{n-1}+v_n & <(v_{n-1}+v_n)^2 - v_{n-1}v_n \end{align*} but this cannot be true since \(0 < v_{n-1}+v_n < 1\) and \(v_n v_{n-1} > 0\)
  3. The only way this is possible is if the first and last marble are moving. \begin{align*} \text{COM}: && 1 &= v_0 +\lambda v_{n+1} \\ \text{COE}: && \frac12 &= \frac12 v_0^2 + \frac12 \lambda^2 v_{n+1} \\ && 1 &= v_0^2 + \lambda v_{n+1}^2 \\ \Rightarrow && 2v_0 + \lambda v_{n+1} &= v_{n+1} \\ \Rightarrow && v_{n+1} &=\frac{2}{1-\lambda} v_0 \\ \Rightarrow && v_0 &= \frac{1-\lambda}{1+\lambda} \\ && v_{n+1} &= \frac{2}{1+\lambda} \end{align*} which will work since \(v_0\) can travel backwards.

View
1990 Paper 3 Q12
D: 1700.0 B: 1500.0
momentum collisions wedge elastic collision conservation of momentum energy conservation smooth surface projectile particle on wedge coefficient of restitution

A uniform smooth wedge of mass \(m\) has congruent triangular end faces \(A_{1}B_{1}C_{1}\) and \(A_{2}B_{2}C_{2},\) and \(A_{1}A_{2},B_{1}B_{2}\) and \(C_{1}C_{2}\) are perpendicular to these faces. The points \(A,B\) and \(C\) are the midpoints of \(A_{1}A_{2},B_{1}B_{2}\) and \(C_{1}C_{2}\) respectively. The sides of the triangle \(ABC\) have lengths \(AB=AC=5a\) and \(BC=6a.\) The wedge is placed with \(BC\) on a smooth horizontal table, a particle of mass \(2m\) is placed at \(A\) on \(AC,\) and the system is released from rest. The particle slides down \(AC,\) strikes the table, bounces perfectly elastically and lands again on the table at \(D\). At this time the point \(C\) of the wedge has reached the point \(E\). Show that \(DE=\frac{192}{19}a.\)

Solution: Conservation of energy, tells us that \(2m \cdot g \cdot 4a = 8amg\) is equal to \(\frac12 m v_{wedge}^2 + \frac12(2m)v_{particle}^2\). Conservation of momentum (horizontally) tells us that \(m v_{wedge}+2mv_{particle, \rightarrow} = 0 \Rightarrow v_{particle, \rightarrow} = -\frac12 v_{wedge}\).

TikZ diagram
We know that the particle must remain on the slope, and so \(v_{particle,\downarrow} = \frac{4}{3} \frac{3}{2} v_{wedge} = 2v_{wedge}\). In conclusion, we have: \begin{align*} && 8amg &= \frac12 m v_{wedge}^2 + \frac12 (2m)\left ((-\tfrac12 v_{wedge})^2 + (2v_{wedge})^2 \right ) \\ &&&= \frac{19}{4}mv_{wedge}^2 \\ \Rightarrow && v_{wedge}^2 &= \frac{32}{19}ag \end{align*}. To calculate the time the ball bounces for, note that: \(s = ut + \frac12 at^2 \Rightarrow 0 = 2v_{wedge} - \frac12 gt \Rightarrow t = \frac{4v_{wedge}}{g}\). During this time, the wedge (and ball) who horizontally are moving apart with speed \(\frac32 v_{wedge}\) we have they move apart by: \begin{align*} && DE &= \underbrace{\frac32 v_{wedge}}_{\text{speed they move apart}} \cdot \underbrace{\frac{4v_{wedge}}{g}}_{\text{time they are moving apart for}} \\ &&&= \frac{6}{g} v_{wedge}^2 \\ &&&= \frac{6}{g}\frac{32}{19}ag \\ &&&= \frac{192}{19}a \end{align*}

View