2009 Paper 3 Q6

Year: 2009
Paper: 3
Question Number: 6

Course: UFM Pure
Section: Complex numbers 2

Difficulty: 1700.0 Banger: 1473.1

Problem

Show that $\big\vert \e^{\i\beta} -\e^{\i\alpha}\big\vert = 2\sin\frac12 (\beta-\alpha)\,\( for \)0<\alpha<\beta<2\pi\,$. Hence show that \[ \big\vert \e^{\i\alpha} -\e^{\i\beta}\big\vert \; \big\vert \e^{\i\gamma} -\e^{\i\delta}\big\vert + \big\vert \e^{\i\beta} -\e^{\i\gamma}\big\vert \; \big\vert \e^{\i\alpha} -\e^{\i\delta}\big\vert = \big\vert \e^{\i\alpha} -\e^{\i\gamma}\big\vert \; \big\vert \e^{\i\beta} -\e^{\i\delta}\big\vert \,, \] where \(0<\alpha<\beta<\gamma<\delta<2\pi\). Interpret this result as a theorem about cyclic quadrilaterals.

No solution available for this problem.

Examiner's report
— 2009 STEP 3, Question 6
Mean: ~8 / 20 (inferred) 33% attempted Inferred ~8/20: 'less success than any of its predecessors' (Q1-Q5 all ≈11.5-12); must be noticeably below 11.5, 'all or nothing' distribution suggests moderate mean. Bounded above by Q4 (11.5) and below by Q7 (10); set at 8 given poor description.

About a third of the candidates attempted this, though with less success than any of its predecessors. Attempts were mostly "all or nothing". Some candidates thought that the cyclic quadrilateral property had to be that opposite angles are supplementary, as the only property that they knew.

The vast majority of candidates (in excess of 95%) attempted at least five questions, and nearly a quarter attempted more than six questions, though very few doing so achieved high scores (about 2%). Most attempting more than six questions were submitting fragmentary answers, which, as the rubric informed candidates, earned little credit.

Source: Cambridge STEP 2009 Examiner's Report · 2009-full.pdf
Rating Information

Difficulty Rating: 1700.0

Difficulty Comparisons: 0

Banger Rating: 1473.1

Banger Comparisons: 2

Show LaTeX source
Problem source
Show that $\big\vert \e^{\i\beta} -\e^{\i\alpha}\big\vert
= 2\sin\frac12 (\beta-\alpha)\,$ for $0<\alpha<\beta<2\pi\,$.
Hence show that 
\[
\big\vert \e^{\i\alpha} -\e^{\i\beta}\big\vert
\;
\big\vert \e^{\i\gamma} -\e^{\i\delta}\big\vert
+
\big\vert \e^{\i\beta} -\e^{\i\gamma}\big\vert
\;
\big\vert \e^{\i\alpha} -\e^{\i\delta}\big\vert
=
\big\vert \e^{\i\alpha} -\e^{\i\gamma}\big\vert
\;
\big\vert \e^{\i\beta} -\e^{\i\delta}\big\vert
\,,
\]
where $0<\alpha<\beta<\gamma<\delta<2\pi$.
Interpret this result as a theorem about  cyclic quadrilaterals.