Year: 2017
Paper: 1
Question Number: 10
Course: UFM Mechanics
Section: Momentum and Collisions 1
The pure questions were again the most popular of the paper with questions 1 and 3 being attempted by almost all candidates. The least popular questions on the paper were questions 10, 11, 12 and 13 and a significant proportion of attempts at these were brief, attracting few or no marks. Candidates generally demonstrated a high level of competence when completing the standard processes and there were many good attempts made when questions required explanations to be given, particularly within the pure questions. A common feature of the stronger responses to questions was the inclusion of diagrams.
Difficulty Rating: 1500.0
Difficulty Comparisons: 0
Banger Rating: 1484.0
Banger Comparisons: 1
Particles $P_1$, $P_2$, $\ldots$ are at rest on the $x$-axis, and the $x$-coordinate of $P_n$ is $n$.
The mass of $P_n$ is $\lambda^nm$.
Particle $P$, of mass $m$, is projected from the origin at speed $u$ towards $P_1$. A series of collisions takes place, and the coefficient of restitution at each collision is $e$, where $0 < e <1$. The speed of $P_n$ immediately after its first collision is $u_n$ and the speed of $P_n$ immediately after its second collision is $v_n$. No external forces act on the particles.
\begin{questionparts}
\item Show that $u_1=\dfrac{1+e}{1+\lambda}\, u$ and find expressions for $u_n$ and $v_n$ in terms of $e$, $\lambda$, $u$ and $n$.
\item Show that, if $e > \lambda$, then each particle (except $P$) is involved in exactly two collisions.
\item Describe what happens if $e=\lambda$ and show that, in this case, the fraction of the initial kinetic energy lost approaches $e$ as the number of collisions increases.
\item Describe what happens if $\lambda e=1$. What fraction of the initial kinetic energy is \mbox{eventually} lost in this case?
\end{questionparts}
\begin{questionparts}
\item \begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.7]
\def\h{2.75};
\def\arrowheight{1.5};
\def\arrowwidth{0.4};
\def\massa{$m$};
\def\massb{$\lambda m$};
\def\velocityua{$u$};
\def\velocityub{$0$};
\def\velocityva{$v$};
\def\velocityvb{$u_1$};
\draw (0,0) circle (1);
\draw (2.5,0) circle (1);
\draw (8,0) circle (1);
\draw (10.5,0) circle (1);
\node at (1.25, \h) {before collision};
\node at (9.25, \h) {after collision};
\draw[dashed] (5.25,-\arrowheight) -- (5.25, \arrowheight);
\node at (0,0) {\massa};
\draw[->, thick, red] (-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);
\node[above, red] at (0, \arrowheight) {\velocityua};
\node at (2.5,0) {\massb};
\draw[->, thick, red] (2.5-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (2.5+\arrowwidth, \arrowheight); \node[above, red] at (2.5, \arrowheight) {\velocityub};
\node at (8,0) {\massa};
\draw[->, thick, red] (8-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (8+\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);
\node[red,above] at (8, \arrowheight) {\velocityva};
\node at (10.5,0 ) {\massb};
\draw[->, thick, red] (10.5-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (10.5+\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);
\node[red,above] at (10.5, \arrowheight) {\velocityvb};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\begin{align*}
\text{COM}: && mu &= mv + \lambda m u_1 \\
\Rightarrow && u &= v + \lambda u_1 \tag{1} \\
\text{NEL}: && e &= \frac{u_1-v}{u} \\
\Rightarrow && eu &= u_1 - v \tag{2} \\
(1)+(2) && (1+e)u &= (1+\lambda) u_1 \\
\Rightarrow && u_1 &= \frac{1+e}{1+\lambda}u \\
&& v &= u_1 - eu \\
&&&= \frac{1+e - (1+\lambda)e}{1+\lambda} u \\
&&&= \frac{1-\lambda e}{1+\lambda}u
\end{align*}
Note that subsequent (first (and second)) are the same as these, therefore:
\begin{align*}
u_n &= \left ( \frac{1+e}{1+\lambda} \right)^n u \\
v_n &= \frac{1-\lambda e}{1+\lambda } u_n \\
&= \frac{1-\lambda e}{1+\lambda } \left ( \frac{1+e}{1+\lambda} \right)^n u
\end{align*}
\item If $e > \lambda$ then $(1-\lambda e) > 1-e^2 > 0$ and
\begin{align*}
\frac{v_{n+1}}{v_n} &= \frac{1+e}{1+\lambda} > 1
\end{align*}
So the particles are moving away from each other - hence no more collisions.
\item If $e = \lambda$ then $u_n = u$ and $v_n = (1-\lambda)u$ so all the particles end up moving at the same speed.
\begin{align*}
\text{initial k.e.} &= \frac12 m u^2 \\
\text{final k.e.} &= \frac12 m((1-e)u)^2 + \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac12 \lambda^n m ((1-e)u)^2 \\
&= \frac12mu^2(1-e)^2 \left ( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} e^n \right) \tag{$e = \lambda$} \\
&= \frac12 mu^2(1-e)^2 \frac{1}{1-e} \\
&= \frac12m u^2 (1-e) \\
\text{change in k.e.} &= \frac12 m u^2 - \frac12m u^2 (1-e) \\
&= e\frac12m u^2
\end{align*}
Ie the total energy lost approaches a fraction of $e$.
\item If $\lambda e = 1$, after the second collision the particle will be stationary. ie
\begin{align*}
\text{initial k.e.} &= \frac12 m u^2 \\
\text{k.e. after }n\text{ collisions} &= \frac12 \lambda^n m \left (\left ( \frac{1+e}{1+\lambda} \right)^n u \right)^2\\
&= \frac12 \lambda^n m \left ( \frac{1+\frac1{\lambda}}{1+\lambda} \right)^{2n} u&2\\
&= \frac12 \lambda^n m \left ( \frac{1+\frac1{\lambda}}{1+\lambda} \right)^{2n} u\\
&= \frac12 \lambda^n m \left ( \frac{1}{\lambda} \right)^{2n} u\\
&= \frac12 m \lambda^{-n} u\\
&\to 0
\end{align*}
Eventually we lose all the kinetic energy.
\end{questionparts}
Approximately one quarter of candidates attempted this question. In general the use of conservation of momentum and restitution was completed well by candidates, including in the case of the series of collisions. Part (i) was generally well answered, and many candidates were able to give at least a partial explanation of the result in part (ii). Part (iii) caused considerably greater problems for many candidates, who struggled to identify the infinite series in order to evaluate the sum. Those who did successfully complete part (iii) were often able to complete part (iv) as well.