2013 Paper 1 Q10

Year: 2013
Paper: 1
Question Number: 10

Course: UFM Mechanics
Section: Momentum and Collisions 1

Difficulty: 1500.0 Banger: 1500.0

Problem

Two parallel vertical barriers are fixed a distance \(d\) apart on horizontal ice. A small ice hockey puck moves on the ice backwards and forwards between the barriers, in the direction perpendicular to the barriers, colliding with each in turn. The coefficient of friction between the puck and the ice is \(\mu\) and the coefficient of restitution between the puck and each of the barriers is \(r\). The puck starts at one of the barriers, moving with speed \(v\) towards the other barrier. Show that \[ v_{i+1}^2 - r^2 v_i^2 = - 2 r^2 \mu gd\, \] where \(v_i\) is the speed of the puck just after its \(i\)th collision. The puck comes to rest against one of the barriers after traversing the gap between them \(n\) times. In the case \(r\ne1\), express \(n\) in terms of \(r\) and \(k\), where \(k= \dfrac{v^2}{2\mu g d}\,\). If \(r=\e^{-1}\) (where \(\e\) is the base of natural logarithms) show that \[ n = \tfrac12 \ln\big(1+k(\e^2-1)\big)\,. \] Give an expression for \(n\) in the case \(r=1\).

Solution

\begin{align*} \text{W.E.P.}: && \text{change in energy} &= \text{work done on particle} \\ \Rightarrow && \underbrace{\frac12mv^2}_{\text{speed before hitting barrier}} - \underbrace{\frac12mu^2}_{\text{speed leaving first barrier}} &= \underbrace{\left( -\mu mg \right)}_{F} \cdot \underbrace{d}_{d} \\ \Rightarrow && v^2 &= v_i^2-2\mu gd \end{align*} Newton's experimental law tells us that the speed leaving the barrier will be \(r\) times the speed approaching, ie \begin{align*} && v_{i+1} &= rv \\ \Rightarrow && v_{i+1}^2 &= r^2 v^2 \\ &&&= r^2v_i^2 - 2r^2\mu gd \\ \Rightarrow && v_{i+1}^2 - r^2v_i^2 &= - 2r^2\mu gd \end{align*} It must be the case that after \(n+1\) collisions the speed is zero, ie \(v_{n+1}^2 = 0\). Not that we can consider \(w_i = \frac{v_i^2}{2\mu gd}\) and we have the recurrence: \begin{align*} && w_{i+1} &=r^2w_i -r^2 \\ \end{align*} Looking at this we have a linear recurrence with a constant term, so let's try \(w_i = C\), then \begin{align*} && C &= r^2 C - r^2 \\ \Rightarrow && C &= \frac{-r^2}{1-r^2} \\ \end{align*} So \(w_i = Ar^{2i} - \frac{r^2}{1-r^2}\). \(w_0 = k \Rightarrow A = k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2}\) Therefore \(w_n = \left (k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \right)r^{2n} - \frac{r^2}{1-r^2}\) Suppose \(w_n = 0\) then, \begin{align*} && 0 &= \left (k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \right)r^{2n} - \frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \\ \Rightarrow && r^{2n} &= \frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \frac{1}{k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2}} \\ &&&= \frac{r^2}{k(1-r^2)+r^2} \\ \Rightarrow && 2n \ln r &= 2\ln r - \ln[k(1-r^2)+r^2] \\ \Rightarrow && n &= 1 - \frac1{2\ln r} \ln[k(1-r^2)+r^2)] \end{align*} If \(r = e^{-1}\) then \(\ln r = -1\) \begin{align*} && n &= 1 + \frac12 \ln [k(1-e^{-2}) + e^{-2}] \\ &&&= 1 + \frac12 \ln [e^{-2}(k(e^2-1)+1)] \\ &&&= 1 + \frac12 \ln e^{-2} + \frac12 \ln [1+k(e^2-1)] \\ &&&= \frac12 \ln [1+k(e^2-1)] \end{align*} If \(r = 1\) the recurrence becomes: \(w_{i+1} = w_i - 1\), so \(w_i = k-n\), so we have \(k\) collisions.
Examiner's report
— 2013 STEP 1, Question 10
Mean: 7.7 / 20 ~10% attempted (inferred) Inferred ~10% from '150 responses' out of ~1500

This question proved to be the least popular question on the paper, eliciting a mere 150 responses. The mean score of 7.7 on it was almost entirely drawn from the first six marks allocated for obtaining the given result, and then for setting vn = 0 in the following part. This does raise the thorny issue – during the setting process – of the extent to which (intermediate) answers should be given in the question, as candidates clearly find great comfort in having something to work towards, but are otherwise surprisingly weak. Here, for instance, almost any tiny slip-up in working, signs, etc., inevitably had disastrous consequences for a candidate's prospect of successful continuation with the work and very few indeed progressed much beyond the first result.

Around 1500 candidates sat this paper, a significant increase on last year. Overall, responses were good with candidates finding much to occupy them profitably during the three hours of the examination. In hindsight, two or three of the questions lacked sufficient 'punch' in their later parts, but at least most candidates showed sufficient skill to identify them and work on them as part of their chosen selection of questions. On the whole, nearly all candidates managed to attempt 4-6 questions – although there is always a significant minority who attempt 7, 8, 9, … bit and pieces of questions – and most scored well on at least two. Indeed, there were many scripts with 6 question-attempts, most or all of which were fantastically accomplished mathematically, and such excellence is very heart-warming.

Source: Cambridge STEP 2013 Examiner's Report · 2013-full.pdf
Rating Information

Difficulty Rating: 1500.0

Difficulty Comparisons: 0

Banger Rating: 1500.0

Banger Comparisons: 0

Show LaTeX source
Problem source
Two parallel vertical barriers are fixed a distance $d$ apart on horizontal ice. A small ice hockey puck moves on the ice backwards and forwards between the barriers, in the direction perpendicular to the barriers, colliding with each in turn. The coefficient of friction between the puck and the ice is $\mu$ and the coefficient of restitution between the puck and each of the barriers is $r$. 
The puck starts at one of the barriers,  moving with speed $v$ towards the other barrier. Show that
\[
v_{i+1}^2 - r^2 v_i^2 = - 2 r^2 \mu gd\,
\]
where $v_i$ is the speed of the puck just after its $i$th collision.
The puck comes to rest against one of the barriers after traversing the gap between them $n$ times. In the case $r\ne1$, express $n$ in terms of $r$ and $k$, where $k= \dfrac{v^2}{2\mu g d}\,$. If $r=\e^{-1}$ (where $\e$ is the base of natural logarithms) show that
\[
n = \tfrac12 \ln\big(1+k(\e^2-1)\big)\,.
\]
Give an expression for $n$ in the case $r=1$.
Solution source
\begin{align*}
\text{W.E.P.}: && \text{change in energy} &= \text{work done on particle} \\
\Rightarrow && \underbrace{\frac12mv^2}_{\text{speed before hitting barrier}} - \underbrace{\frac12mu^2}_{\text{speed leaving first barrier}} &= \underbrace{\left( -\mu mg \right)}_{F} \cdot \underbrace{d}_{d} \\
\Rightarrow && v^2 &= v_i^2-2\mu gd
\end{align*}

Newton's experimental law tells us that the speed leaving the barrier will be $r$ times the speed approaching, ie

\begin{align*}
&& v_{i+1} &= rv \\
\Rightarrow && v_{i+1}^2 &= r^2 v^2 \\
&&&= r^2v_i^2 - 2r^2\mu gd \\
\Rightarrow && v_{i+1}^2 - r^2v_i^2 &= - 2r^2\mu gd
\end{align*}

It must be the case that after $n+1$ collisions the speed is zero, ie $v_{n+1}^2 = 0$.

Not that we can consider $w_i = \frac{v_i^2}{2\mu gd}$ and we have the recurrence:

\begin{align*}
&& w_{i+1} &=r^2w_i  -r^2 \\
\end{align*}

Looking at this we have a linear recurrence with a constant term, so let's try $w_i = C$, then

\begin{align*}
&& C &= r^2 C - r^2 \\
\Rightarrow && C &= \frac{-r^2}{1-r^2} \\
\end{align*}

So $w_i = Ar^{2i} - \frac{r^2}{1-r^2}$.

$w_0 = k \Rightarrow A = k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2}$

Therefore $w_n = \left (k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \right)r^{2n} - \frac{r^2}{1-r^2}$

Suppose $w_n = 0$ then,

\begin{align*}
&& 0 &= \left (k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \right)r^{2n} - \frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \\
\Rightarrow && r^{2n} &= \frac{r^2}{1-r^2} \frac{1}{k+\frac{r^2}{1-r^2}} \\
&&&= \frac{r^2}{k(1-r^2)+r^2} \\
\Rightarrow && 2n \ln r &= 2\ln r - \ln[k(1-r^2)+r^2] \\
\Rightarrow && n &= 1 - \frac1{2\ln r}  \ln[k(1-r^2)+r^2)]
\end{align*}

If $r = e^{-1}$ then $\ln r = -1$

\begin{align*}
&& n &= 1 + \frac12 \ln [k(1-e^{-2}) + e^{-2}] \\
&&&= 1 + \frac12 \ln [e^{-2}(k(e^2-1)+1)] \\
&&&= 1 + \frac12 \ln e^{-2} + \frac12  \ln [1+k(e^2-1)] \\
&&&= \frac12  \ln [1+k(e^2-1)]
\end{align*}

If $r = 1$ the recurrence becomes:

$w_{i+1} = w_i - 1$, so $w_i = k-n$, so we have $k$ collisions.