Problems

Filters
Clear Filters

4 problems found

2016 Paper 2 Q5
D: 1600.0 B: 1484.0

In this question, the definition of \(\displaystyle\binom pq\) is taken to be \[ \binom pq = \begin{cases} \dfrac{p!}{q!(p-q)!} & \text{ if } p\ge q\ge0 \,,\\[4mm] 0 & \text{ otherwise } . \end{cases} \]

  1. Write down the coefficient of \(x^n\) in the binomial expansion for \((1-x)^{-N}\), where \(N\) is a positive integer, and write down the expansion using the \(\Sigma\) summation notation. By considering $ (1-x)^{-1} (1-x)^{-N} \, ,$ where \(N\) is a positive integer, show that \[ \sum_{j=0}^n \binom { N+j -1}{j} = \binom{N+n}{n}\,. \]
  2. Show that, for any positive integers \(m\), \(n\) and \(r\) with \(r\le m+n\), \[ \binom{m+n} r = \sum _{j=0}^r \binom m j \binom n {r-j} \,. \]
  3. Show that, for any positive integers \(m\) and \(N\), \[ \sum_{j=0}^n(-1)^{j} \binom {N+m} {n-j} \binom {m+j-1}{j } = \displaystyle \binom N n . \]


Solution:

  1. \(\frac{(-N)(-N-1)\cdots(-N-n+1)}{n!} = \binom{N+n-1}{n}\), so \[ (1-x)^{-N} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \binom{N+n-1}{n} x^n\] \begin{align*} && (1-x)^{-N-1} &= (1-x)^{-1}(1-x)^{-N} \\ &&&= (1 + x + x^2 + \cdots)\left ( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \binom{N+n-1}{n} x^n\right)\\ [x^{n}]: && \binom{N+1+n-1}{n} &= \sum_{j=0}^n \underbrace{1}_{x^{n-j} \text{ from 1st bracket}}\cdot\underbrace{\binom{N+j-1}{j}}_{x^j\text{ from second bracket}} \\ \Rightarrow && \binom{N+n}{n} &= \sum_{j=0}^n \binom{N+j-1}{j} \end{align*}
  2. Consider \((1+x)^{m+n} = (1+x)^m(1+x)^n\) and consider the coefficient of \(x^r\) from each side. On the left hand side this is clearly \(\binom{m+n}{r}\) on the right hand side we can take \(x^j\) from \((1+x)^m\) and \(x^{n-j}\) from \((1+x)^n\) and \(j\) can take any value from \(0\) to \(r\), ie \[ \binom{m+n} r = \sum _{j=0}^r \binom m j \binom n {r-j} \]
  3. Consider \((1-x)^{-(N+m+1)} = (\)

2000 Paper 2 Q13
D: 1600.0 B: 1594.9

A group of biologists attempts to estimate the magnitude, \(N\), of an island population of voles ({\it Microtus agrestis}). Accordingly, the biologists capture a random sample of 200 voles, mark them and release them. A second random sample of 200 voles is then taken of which 11 are found to be marked. Show that the probability, \(p_N\), of this occurrence is given by $$ p_N = k{{{\big((N-200)!\big)}^2} \over {N!(N-389)!}}, $$ where \(k\) is independent of \(N\). The biologists then estimate \(N\) by calculating the value of \(N\) for which \(p_N\) is a maximum. Find this estimate. All unmarked voles in the second sample are marked and then the entire sample is released. Subsequently a third random sample of 200 voles is taken. Write down the probability that this sample contains exactly \(j\) marked voles, leaving your answer in terms of binomial coefficients. Deduce that $$ \sum_{j=0}^{200}{389 \choose j}{3247 \choose {200-j}} = {3636 \choose 200}. $$


Solution: There will be \(200\) marked vols out of \(N\), and we are finding \(11\) of them. There are \(\binom{200}{11}\) ways to chose the \(11\) marked voles and \(\binom{N - 200}{200-11}\) ways to choose the unmarked voles. The total number of ways to choose \(200\) voles is \(\binom{N}{200}\). Therefore the probability is \begin{align*} p_N &= \frac{\binom{200}{11} \cdot \binom{N - 200}{200-11}}{\binom{N}{200}} \\ &= \binom{200}{11} \cdot \frac{ \frac{(N-200)!}{(189)!(N - 389)!} }{\frac{N!}{(N-200)!(200)!}} \\ &= \binom{200}{11} \frac{200!}{189!} \frac{\big((N-200)!\big)^2}{N!(N-389)!} \end{align*} As required and \(k = \binom{200}{11} \frac{200!}{189!}\). We want to maximise \(\frac{(N-200)!^2}{N!(N-389)!}\), we will do this by comparing consecutive \(p_N\). \begin{align*} \frac{p_{N+1}}{p_N} &= \frac{\frac{(N+1-200)!^2}{(N+1)!(N+1-389)!}}{\frac{(N-200)!^2}{N!(N-389)!}} \\ &= \frac{(N-199)!^2 \cdot N! \cdot (N-389)!}{(N+1)!(N-388)!(N-200)!^2} \\ &= \frac{(N-199)^2 \cdot 1 \cdot 1}{(N+1) \cdot (N-388)\cdot 1} \\ \end{align*} \begin{align*} && \frac{p_{N+1}}{p_N} &> 1 \\ \Leftrightarrow && \frac{(N-199)^2 \cdot 1 \cdot 1}{(N+1) \cdot (N-388)\cdot 1} & > 1 \\ \Leftrightarrow && (N-199)^2 & > (N+1) \cdot (N-388) \\ \Leftrightarrow && N^2-2\cdot199N+199^2 & > N^2 - 387N -388 \\ \Leftrightarrow && -398N+199^2 & > - 387N -388 \\ \Leftrightarrow && 199^2+388 & > 11N\\ \Leftrightarrow && \frac{199^2+388}{11} & > N\\ \Leftrightarrow && 3635\frac{4}{11} & > N\\ \end{align*} Therefore \(p_N\) is increasing if \(N \leq 3635\), so we should take \(N = 3636\). \[ \P(\text{exactly } j \text{ marked voles}) = \frac{\binom{389}{j} \cdot \binom{3636 - 389}{200-j}}{\binom{3636}{200}}\] Since \begin{align*} && 1 &= \sum_{j=0}^{200} \P(\text{exactly } j \text{ marked voles}) \\ && &= \sum_{j=0}^{200} \frac{\binom{389}{j} \cdot \binom{3247}{200-j}}{\binom{3636}{200}} \\ \Leftrightarrow&& \binom{3636}{200} &= \sum_{j=0}^{200} \binom{389}{j} \cdot \binom{3247}{200-j} \end{align*}

1999 Paper 2 Q4
D: 1600.0 B: 1500.0

By considering the expansions in powers of \(x\) of both sides of the identity $$ {(1+x)^n}{(1+x)^n}\equiv{(1+x)^{2n}}, $$ show that $$ \sum_{s=0}^n {n\choose s}^2 = {2n\choose n}, $$ where \(\displaystyle {n\choose s}= \frac{n!}{s!\,(n-s)!}\). By considering similar identities, or otherwise, show also that:

  1. if \(n\) is an even integer, then \(\displaystyle \sum_{s=0}^n {{(-1)}^s}{n \choose s}^2= (-1)^{n/2}{n \choose n/2};\)
  2. \(\displaystyle \sum\limits_{t=1}^ n 2t { n \choose t}^2 = n {2n\choose n} .\)


Solution: To obtain the coefficient of \(x^n\) on the RHS we clearly have \(\displaystyle \binom{2n}n\). To obtain the coefficient of \(x^n\) on the LHS we can obtain \(x^s\) from the first bracket and \(x^{n-s}\) from the second bracket, ie \(\displaystyle \sum_{s=0}^n \binom{n}{s}\binom{n}{n-s} = \sum_{s=0}^n \binom{n}{s}\binom{n}{s} = \sum_{s=0}^n \binom{n}{s}^2\)

  1. Consider \((1-x)^n(1+x)^n = (1-x^2)^n\), then the coefficient of \(x^n\) (if \(n\) is even) is for the RHS \(\displaystyle (-1)^{n/2} \binom{n}{n/2}\). For the LHS, we can obtain \(x^n\) via \(x^s\) and \(x^{n-s}\) which is \(\displaystyle \sum_{s=0}^n (-1)^s\binom{n}{s}\binom{n}{n-s} = \sum_{s=0}^n (-1)^s\binom{n}{s}^2\)
  2. Notice that \begin{align*} && \sum_{t=1}^ n 2t { n \choose t}^2 &= n {2n\choose n} \\ \Leftrightarrow && \sum_{t=1}^ n 2t \frac{n}{t} { n-1 \choose t-1}\binom{n}{t} &= n \frac{2n}{n}{2n-1\choose n-1} \\ \Leftrightarrow && \sum_{t=1}^ n { n-1 \choose t-1}\binom{n}{t} &= {2n-1\choose n-1} \\ \Leftrightarrow && \sum_{t=1}^ n { n-1 \choose t-1}\binom{n}{n-t} &= {2n-1\choose n-1} \\ \end{align*} but this is exactly what we would obtain by considering the coefficient of \(x^{n-1}\) in \((1+x)^{n-1}(1+x)^n \equiv (1+x)^{2n-1}\)

1996 Paper 2 Q13
D: 1600.0 B: 1516.0

By considering the coefficients of \(t^{n}\) in the equation \[(1+t)^{n}(1+t)^{n}=(1+t)^{2n},\] or otherwise, show that \[\binom{n}{0}\binom{n}{n}+\binom{n}{1}\binom{n}{n-1}+\cdots +\binom{n}{r}\binom{n}{n-r}+\cdots+\binom{n}{n}\binom{n}{0} =\binom{2n}{n}.\] The large American city of Triposville is laid out in a square grid with equally spaced streets running east-west and avenues running north-south. My friend is staying at a hotel \(n\) avenues west and \(n\) streets north of my hotel. Both hotels are at intersections. We set out from our own hotels at the same time. We walk at the same speed, taking 1 minute to go from one intersection to the next. Every time I reach an intersection I go north with probability \(1/2\) or west with probability \(1/2\). Every time my friend reaches an intersection she goes south with probability \(1/2\) or east with probability \(1/2\). Our choices are independent of each other and of our previous decisions. Indicate by a sketch or by a brief description the set of points where we could meet. Find the probability that we meet. Suppose that I oversleep and leave my hotel \(2k\) minutes later than my friend leaves hers, where \(k\) is an integer and \(0\leqslant 2k\leqslant n\). Find the probability that we meet. Have you any comment? If \(n=1\) and I leave my hotel \(1\) minute later than my friend leaves hers, what is the probability that we meet and why?


Solution: \begin{align*} && (1+t)^{n}(1+t)^{n}&=(1+t)^{2n} \\ [t^n]: &&\sum_{k=0}^n \underbrace{\binom{n}{k}}_{t^k\text{ from left bracket}} \underbrace{\binom{n}{n-k}}_{t^{n-k}\text{ from right bracket}} &= \binom{2n}{n} \end{align*}

TikZ diagram
From each point, we can get to the diagonal ahead of us, so each move only takes us one diagonal closer together. Therefore we can only meet on the diagonal. The number of routes we can meet at is \begin{align*} && R &= \sum_{k=0}^n \underbrace{\binom{n}{k}}_{\text{I go up } k}\underbrace{\binom{n}{n-k}}_{\text{she goes down }n-k} \\ &&&= \binom{2n}{n} \end{align*} Therefore the probability is \(\displaystyle \frac1{2^{2n}} \binom{2n}n\). If I leave \(2k\) minutes late, then we will be attempting meet on a diagonal which is \(2k\) closer to me. The probability this occurs is \begin{align*} && \frac{1}{2^{2n}}\sum_{j=0}^{n-k}\binom{n-k}{j}\binom{n+k}{n-j} &= \frac{1}{2^{2n}}\binom{2n}{n} \end{align*} (by considering the coefficient of \(t^n\) in \((1+t)^{n+k}(1+t)^{n-k} =(1+t)^{2n}\)) This probability is unchanged, because you can consider the two paths as one path by one random person, conditional on them meeting and the delay doesn't change anything. If \(n = 1\) and I leave late, the only way we meet is if we end up walking towards each other down the same street (not at an intersection). This means I need to walk towards the intersection she reaches after the first minute \(\frac12\) and she needs to walk towards me \(\frac12\) so we have probability \(\frac14\)