1 problem found
In this question, \(\Phi(z)\) is the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal random variable. A random variable is known to have a Normal distribution with mean \(\mu\) and standard deviation either \(\sigma_0\) or \(\sigma_1\), where \(\sigma_0 < \sigma_1\,\). The mean, \(\overline{X}\), of a random sample of \(n\) values of \(X\) is to be used to test the hypothesis \(\mathrm{H}_0: \sigma = \sigma_0\) against the alternative \(\mathrm{H}_1: \sigma = \sigma_1\,\). Explain carefully why it is appropriate to use a two sided test of the form: accept \(\mathrm{H}_0\) if \(\mu - c < \overline{X} < \mu+c\,\), otherwise accept \(\mathrm{H}_1\). Given that the probability of accepting \(\mathrm{H}_1\) when \(\mathrm{H}_0\) is true is \(\alpha\), determine \(c\) in terms of \(n\), \(\sigma_0\) and \(z_{\alpha}\), where \(z_\alpha \) is defined by \(\displaystyle\Phi(z_{\alpha}) = 1 - \tfrac{1}{2}\alpha\). The probability of accepting \(\mathrm{H}_0\) when \(\mathrm{H}_1\) is true is denoted by \(\beta\). Show that \(\beta\) is independent of \(n\). Given that \(\Phi(1.960)\approx 0.975\) and that \(\Phi(0.063) \approx 0.525\,\), determine, approximately, the minimum value of \(\displaystyle \frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_0}\) if \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are both to be less than \(0.05\,\).
Solution: If \(\sigma\) is smaller we should expect our sample to have a mean closer to the true mean. Therefore we should use a two sided test which accepts \(\mathrm{H}_0\) if the mean is very close to the true mean. Suppose \(\textrm{H}_0\) is true, ie \(\sigma = \sigma_0\), then note that \(X \sim N(\mu, \frac{\sigma_0^2}{n})\) \begin{align*} && 1-\alpha &= \mathbb{P}(\mu - c < X < \mu + c) \\ &&&= \mathbb{P}(\mu - c < \frac{\sigma_0}{\sqrt{n}} Z + \mu < \mu + c) \\ &&&= \mathbb{P}(- \frac{c\sqrt{n}}{\sigma_0} < Z<\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0}) \\ &&&= \mathbb{P}(Z<\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0}) -\mathbb{P}( Z<-\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0}) \\ &&&= \mathbb{P}(Z<\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0}) -(1-\mathbb{P}( Z<\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0})) \\ &&&= 2\mathbb{P}(Z<\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0})-1 \\ \Rightarrow && \Phi(\frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0})&=1 - \tfrac12 \alpha \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_0} &= z_{\alpha} \\ && c &= \frac{\sigma_0 z_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{n}} \end{align*} Under \(\mathrm{H}_1\), \(\sigma = \sigma_1\) so \begin{align*} && \beta &= \mathbb{P}(\mu - c < X < \mu + c) \\ &&&= \mathbb{P}(-\frac{c\sqrt{n}}{\sigma_1} < Z < \frac{\sqrt{n}c}{\sigma_1}) \\ &&&= \mathbb{P}(-\frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_1} z_{\alpha}< Z < \frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_1} z_{\alpha}) \\ &&&= 2\Phi(\frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_1} z_{\alpha})-1 \end{align*} which does not depend on \(n\). Suppose both \(\alpha<0.05\) and \(\beta<0.05\), then \(z_{\alpha} > 1.96\) and \(\Phi(\frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_1}1.96)<0.525 \Rightarrow \frac{\sigma_0}{\sigma_1}1.96 < 0.063 \Rightarrow \frac{\sigma_1}{\sigma_0} > \frac{1.96}{0.063} = 31.1 \) so the ratio of variances needs to be larger than \(31.1\).