Problems

Filters
Clear Filters

2 problems found

2008 Paper 1 Q11
D: 1500.0 B: 1484.0
friction rigid body circular wire limiting equilibrium moments trigonometric identity rod on ring normal reaction rough surface

A straight uniform rod has mass \(m\). Its ends \(P_1\) and \(P_2\) are attached to small light rings that are constrained to move on a rough rigid circular wire with centre \(O\) fixed in a vertical plane, and the angle \(P_1OP_2\) is a right angle. The rod rests with \(P_1\) lower than \(P_2\), and with both ends lower than \(O\). The coefficient of friction between each of the rings and the wire is \(\mu\). Given that the rod is in limiting equilibrium (i.e. \ on the point of slipping at both ends), show that \[ \tan \alpha = \frac{1-2\mu -\mu^2}{1+2\mu -\mu^2}\,, \] where \(\alpha\) is the angle between \(P_1O\) and the vertical (\(0<\alpha<45^\circ\)). Let \(\theta\) be the acute angle between the rod and the horizontal. Show that \(\theta =2\lambda\), where \(\lambda \) is defined by \(\tan \lambda= \mu\) and \(0<\lambda<22.5^\circ\).

View
1987 Paper 2 Q11
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0
moments friction limiting equilibrium rigid body inclined plane ring pivot rod on ring geometric mechanics

A rough ring of radius \(a\) is fixed so that it lies in a plane inclined at an angle \(\alpha\) to the horizontal. A uniform heavy rod of length \(b(>a)\) has one end smoothly pivoted at the centre of the ring, so that the rod is free to move in any direction. It rests on the circumference of the ring, making an angle \(\theta\) with the radius to the highest point on the circumference. Find the relation between \(\alpha,\theta\) and the coefficient of friction, \(\mu,\) which must hold when the rod is in limiting equilibrium.

Solution:

TikZ diagram
It is important to define clear coordinate axes, so let the \(x\)-axis point up the line of greatest slope of the ring. The \(z\)-axis perpendicular to the ring, and the \(y\)-axis perpendicular to both of these. Our method is going to be to take moments about \(O\) to avoid worrying about the force at the pivot. There are \(3\) forces we need to worry about:
  • The mass of the rod
  • The reaction where it meets the ring
  • The friction at the ring
In our coordinate frame, the reaction will act in the \(z\)-direction, \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ R \end{pmatrix}\), the friction force will act in the \(x-y\) plane: \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \mu R \sin \theta \\ -\mu R \cos \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\). We don't know the mass, but we know it will be acting "vertically", so \(\cos \alpha\) of it will act in the \(z\)-axis and \(\sin \alpha\) will act in the \(y\)-axis, ie it will act parallel to \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \\ 0 \\ \cos \alpha \end{pmatrix}\). When taking moments, we need to consider \(\mathbf{r}\) the direction of the rod. This will be \(\displaystyle \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta \\ \sin \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\). The moment of the weight will all be parallel to \(\mathbf{r} \times \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \\ 0 \\ \cos \alpha \end{pmatrix}\). Similarly the moments of the contact forces will be \(\mathbf{r} \times \begin{pmatrix} \mu R \sin \theta \\ -\mu R \cos \theta \\ R \end{pmatrix}\). Since these moments sum to \(\mathbf{0}\) as we are in equilibrium, these vectors must be parallel. Therefore it is sufficient to check the vector triple product, \begin{align*} && 0 &= \begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta \\ \sin \theta \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \cdot \left ( \begin{pmatrix} \sin \alpha \\ 0 \\ \cos \alpha \end{pmatrix} \times \begin{pmatrix} \mu \sin \theta \\ -\mu \cos \theta \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \right ) \\ &&&= \cos \theta (\mu \cos \theta \cos \alpha)-\sin \theta (\sin \alpha - \mu \sin \theta \cos \alpha) \\ &&&= \mu((\sin^2 \theta+\cos^2 \theta) \cos \alpha) -\sin \theta \sin \alpha \\ \Rightarrow && \mu &= \tan \alpha \sin \theta \end{align*}

View