Year: 2017
Paper: 3
Question Number: 10
Course: zNo longer examinable
Section: Moments of inertia
| Inital | \@ \(\theta\) | |
| Rotational KE of rod | \(0\) | \(\frac{1}{2}I\dot{\theta}^2 = \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{3} m (3a)^2 \dot{\theta}^2 = \frac32 m a^2 \dot{\theta}^2\) |
| KE of particle | \(0\) | \(\frac12 m \ell^2\dot{\theta}^2\) |
| GPE of rod | \(0\) | \(-\frac{3}{2}mga \sin \theta\) |
| GPE of particle | \(0\) | \(-mg \ell \sin \theta\) |
| Total | \(0\) | \(\frac12m \l \l 3a^2 + \ell^2\r \dot{\theta}^2 - \l 3a + 2\ell \r g \sin \theta \r\) |
The total entry was only very slightly smaller than that of 2016, which was a record entry, but was still over 10% more than 2015. No question was attempted by in excess of 90%, although two were very popular and also five others were attempted by 60% or more. No question was generally avoided with even the least popular one attracting more than 10% of the entry. Less than 10% of candidates attempted more than 7 questions, and, apart from 18 exceptions, those doing so did not achieve very good totals and seemed to be 'casting around' to find things they could do: the 18 exceptions were very strong candidates who were generally achieving close to full marks on all the questions they attempted. The general trend was that those with six attempts fared better than those with more than six.
Difficulty Rating: 1700.0
Difficulty Comparisons: 0
Banger Rating: 1484.0
Banger Comparisons: 1
A uniform rod $PQ$ of mass $m$ and length $3a$ is freely hinged at $P$. The rod is held horizontally and a particle of mass $m$ is placed on top of the rod at a distance~$\ell$ from $P$, where $\ell <2a$. The coefficient of friction between the rod and the particle is $\mu$. The rod is then released. Show that, while the particle does not slip along the rod,
\[
(3a^2+\ell^2)\dot \theta^2 = g(3a+2\ell)\sin\theta \,,
\]
where $\theta$ is the angle through which the rod has turned, and the dot denotes the time derivative.
Hence, or otherwise, find an expression for $\ddot \theta$ and show that the normal reaction of the rod on the particle is non-zero when~$\theta$ is acute.
Show further that, when the particle is on the point of slipping,
\[
\tan\theta = \frac{\mu a (2a-\ell)}{2(\ell^2 + a\ell +a^2)} \,.
\]
What happens at the moment the rod is released if, instead, $\ell>2a$?
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=2]
% Define points
\coordinate (P) at (0,0);
\coordinate (Q) at (3*12/13,-3*5/13);
\coordinate (M) at (1.5*12/13,-1.5*5/13);
\coordinate (A) at (12/13, -5/13);
\coordinate (H) at (2*12/13, 0);
% Draw lines
\draw[thick] (P) -- (Q);
\draw[dashed] (P) -- (H);
% Add points labels
\node[above] at (P) {$P$};
\node[above] at (Q) {$Q$};
\node at (A)[circle,fill,inner sep=1.5pt]{};
% % Add angle φ at T
\pic [draw, angle radius=0.8cm, "$\theta$"] {angle = A--P--H};
% % Add an arrow for weight if needed
\draw[-latex, blue, ultra thick] (M) -- ++(0,-0.8) node[below] {$mg$};
\draw[-latex, blue, ultra thick] (A) -- ++(0,-0.8) node[below] {$mg$};
\draw[-latex, blue, ultra thick] (A) -- ++(-0.4*12/13,0.4*5/13) node[left] {$\scriptstyle F \leq \mu R$};
\draw[-latex, blue, ultra thick] (A) -- ++(0.8*5/13,0.8*12/13) node[above] {$R$};
\draw[-latex, red, ultra thick] (2.4*12/13, 0) -- (2.1*12/13, 0) node[above] {$0 $ GPE};
\draw [decorate,decoration={brace,amplitude=10pt},xshift=-0.5cm,yshift=0pt]
(P) -- (A) node [black,midway,yshift=0.5cm,xshift=0.2cm]
{$\ell$};
\draw [decorate,decoration={brace,amplitude=20pt},xshift=-0.5cm,yshift=0pt]
(P) -- (Q) node [black,midway,yshift=0.8cm,xshift=0.2cm]
{$3a$};
\end{tikzpicture}
By energy considerations, the initial energy is $0$.
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l|c|c}
& Inital & \@ $\theta$ \\ \hline
Rotational KE of rod & $0$ & $\frac{1}{2}I\dot{\theta}^2 = \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{3} m (3a)^2 \dot{\theta}^2 = \frac32 m a^2 \dot{\theta}^2$\\
KE of particle & $0$ & $\frac12 m \ell^2\dot{\theta}^2$\\
GPE of rod & $0$ & $-\frac{3}{2}mga \sin \theta$\\
GPE of particle & $0$ & $-mg \ell \sin \theta$ \\ \hline
Total & $0$ & $\frac12m \l \l 3a^2 + \ell^2\r \dot{\theta}^2 - \l 3a + 2\ell \r g \sin \theta \r$
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
Therefore:
\begin{align*}
&& \l 3a^2 + \ell^2\r \dot{\theta}^2 &= \l 3a + 2\ell \r g \sin \theta \\
\Rightarrow && \l 3a^2 + \ell^2\r 2\dot{\theta} \ddot{\theta} &= \l 3a + 2\ell \r g \cos\theta \dot{\theta} \tag{$\frac{\d}{\d t}$} \\
\Rightarrow && 2\l 3a^2 + \ell^2\r \ddot{\theta} &= \l 3a + 2\ell \r g \cos\theta \\
\Rightarrow && \ddot{\theta} &= \boxed{\frac{3a + 2\ell }{2(3a^2 + \ell^2)}g \cos\theta} \\
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\text{N}2(\perp PQ): && mg \cos \theta - R &= m \ell \ddot{\theta} \\
&& R &= mg \cos \theta - m \ell \l \frac{3a + 2\ell }{2(3a^2 + \ell^2)}g \cos\theta \r \\
&& &= mg\cos \theta \l 1 - \ell \frac{3a + 2\ell }{2(3a^2 + \ell^2)} \r \\
&& &= mg \cos \theta \l \frac{6a^2 + 2\ell^2 - 3a\ell - 2\ell^2}{2(3a^2 + \ell^2)} \r \\
&& &= mg \cos \theta \l \frac{3a(2a - \ell)}{2(3a^2 + \ell^2)} \r > 0 \tag{since $2a > \ell$}
\end{align*}
At limiting equilibrium, $F = \mu R$.
\begin{align*}
\text{N}2(\parallel PQ): && \mu R - mg \sin \theta &= m \ell \dot{\theta}^2 \\
\Rightarrow && \mu mg \cos \theta \l \frac{3a(2a - \ell)}{2(3a^2 + \ell^2)} \r - mg \sin \theta &= m \ell \frac{(3a+2\ell)}{(3a^2+\ell^2)} g \sin \theta \\
\Rightarrow && \mu \l 3a(2a - \ell) \r - \l 2(3a^2 + \ell^2) \r \tan \theta &= 2\ell (3a+2\ell) \tan \theta \\
\Rightarrow && \mu \l 3a(2a - \ell) \r &= \l 6a\ell + 6a^2 + 6\ell^2 \r \tan \theta \\
\Rightarrow && \tan \theta &= \boxed{\frac{\mu a(2a-\ell)}{2(a^2 + a\ell + \ell^2)}}
\end{align*}
If $\ell > 2a$, then the initial reaction force will be $0$, ie the particle will have no contact with the rod. In other words, the rod will rotate faster than the particle will free-fall and the particle immediately loses contact with the rod.
Attempted by about one eighth of the candidates, the success rate was only marginally better than that for question 9. The first displayed result and the expression for were generally successfully dealt with by those candidates who knew how to apply moments of inertia. After that point, most mistakes were either algebraic or incorrect signs in the equations derived by resolving forces to obtain acceleration. About half of those that reached the end of the question correctly interpreted the physical meaning of the case ℓ 2. However, a common misinterpretation was that the particle would begin to slip at this point.