2014 Paper 1 Q10

Year: 2014
Paper: 1
Question Number: 10

Course: UFM Mechanics
Section: Momentum and Collisions 1

Difficulty: 1500.0 Banger: 1500.0

Problem

  1. A uniform spherical ball of mass \(M\) and radius \(R\) is released from rest with its centre a distance \(H+R\) above horizontal ground. The coefficient of restitution between the ball and the ground is \(e\). Show that, after bouncing, the centre of the ball reaches a height \(R+He^2\) above the ground.
  2. A second uniform spherical ball, of mass \(m\) and radius \(r\), is now released from rest together with the first ball (whose centre is again a distance \(H+R\) above the ground when it is released). The two balls are initially one on top of the other, with the second ball (of mass \(m\)) above the first. The two balls separate slightly during their fall, with their centres remaining in the same vertical line, so that they collide immediately after the first ball has bounced on the ground. The coefficient of restitution between the balls is also \(e\). The centre of the second ball attains a height \(h\) above the ground. Given that \(R=0.2\), \(r=0.05\), \(H=1.8\), \(h=4.5\) and \(e=\frac23\), determine the value of \(M/m\).

Solution

  1. The story for first ball (before it collides with the second ball) will be exactly the same, ie it rebounds with speed \(eV\). For the second ball, it will also have fallen a distance \(H\) and will be travelling with the same speed \(V\). Their speed of approach therefore will be \((1+e)V\), and the speed of separating therefore must be \(e(1+e)V\) Given the centre of the second ball reaches a height of \(h\) (from a position of height) \(2R+r\), we must have: \begin{align*} && v^2 &= u^2 + 2as \\ && 0 &= w^2 - 2g(h - 2R-r) \\ \Rightarrow && w^2 &= 2g(h-2R-r) \end{align*} Taking upwards to be positive, then we have:
    TikZ diagram
    \begin{align*} \text{COM}: && MeV + m(-V) &= M(w-e(1+e)V) + mw \\ \Rightarrow && V(Me-m)+e(1+e)MV &= w(M+m) \\ \Rightarrow && w &= \frac{2Me+e^2M-m}{M+m} V \\ \Rightarrow && w^2 &= \left ( \frac{M/m(2e+e^2)-1}{M/m+1}\right)^2 V^2 \\ \Rightarrow && 2g(h-2R-r) &= \left ( \frac{M/m(2e+e^2)-1}{M/m+1}\right)^2 2gH \\ \Rightarrow && \left ( \frac{M/m(2e+e^2)-1}{M/m+1}\right)^2 &= \frac{h-2R-r}{H} \\ &&&= \frac{4.5-0.4-0.05}{1.8} \\ &&&= \frac{9}{4} \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{M/m(\frac43+\frac49)-1}{M/m+1} &= \frac32 \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{16}9M/m-1 &= \frac32 M/m+\frac32 \\ \Rightarrow && \frac{5}{18}M/m &= \frac{5}{2} \\ \Rightarrow && M/m &= 9 \end{align*}
Examiner's report
— 2014 STEP 1, Question 10
Mean: 9.5 / 20 ~31% attempted (inferred) ~550 attempts out of 1800+ candidates; inferred ~31% popularity

Q10 attracted the attention of almost 550 candidates. Those candidates who did well on Q10 were generally those who set their working out in a more structured manner. For instance, a diagram to illustrate the assigned (symbols for the) speeds and directions of the objects involved in the collision generally helps prevent mistakes involving signs when applying the principles of Conservation of Linear Momentum and Newton's (Experimental) Law of Restitution. Indeed, without such a clear indication, it is often very difficult indeed for the markers to follow working involving symbols that just appear from nowhere! Q10's mean was around 9½/20.

More than 1800 candidates sat this paper, which represents another increase in uptake for this STEP paper. The impression given, however, is that many of these extra candidates are just not sufficiently well prepared for questions which are not structured in the same way as are the A-level questions that they are, perhaps, more accustomed to seeing. Although STEP questions try to give all able candidates "a bit of an intro." into each question, they are not intended to be easy, and (at some point) imagination and real flair (as well as determination) are required if one is to score well on them. In general, it is simply not possible to get very far into a question without making some attempt to think about what is actually going on in the situation presented therein; and those students who expect to be told exactly what to do at each stage of a process are in for a shock. Too many candidates only attempt the first parts of many questions, restricting themselves to 3-6 marks on each, rather than trying to get to grips with substantial portions of work – the readiness to give up and try to find something else that is "easy pickings" seldom allows such candidates to acquire more than 40 marks (as was the case with almost half of this year's candidature, in fact). Poor preparation was strongly in evidence – curve-sketching skills were weak, inequalities very poorly handled, algebraic capabilities (especially in non-standard settings) were often pretty poor, and the ability to get to grips with extended bits of working lacking in the extreme; also, an unwillingness to be imaginative and creative, allied with a lack of thoroughness and attention to detail, made this a disappointing (and, possibly, very uncomfortable) experience for many of those students who took the paper. On the other side of the coin, there was a very pleasing number of candidates who produced exceptional pieces of work on 5 or 6 questions, and thus scored very highly indeed on the paper overall. Around 100 of them scored 90+ marks of the 120 available, and they should be very proud of their performance – it is a significant and noteworthy achievement.

Source: Cambridge STEP 2014 Examiner's Report · 2014-full.pdf
Rating Information

Difficulty Rating: 1500.0

Difficulty Comparisons: 0

Banger Rating: 1500.0

Banger Comparisons: 0

Show LaTeX source
Problem source
\begin{questionparts}
  \item A uniform spherical ball of mass $M$ and radius $R$ is released from rest with its centre a distance $H+R$ above horizontal ground.  The coefficient of restitution between the ball and the ground is $e$.  Show that, after bouncing, the centre of the ball reaches a height $R+He^2$ above the ground.
    
  \item A second uniform spherical ball, of mass $m$ and radius $r$, is now released from rest together with the first ball (whose centre is again a distance $H+R$ above the ground when it is released). The two balls are initially one on top of the other, with the second ball (of mass $m$) above the first. The two balls separate slightly during their fall, with their centres remaining in the same vertical line, so that they collide immediately after the first ball has bounced on the ground. The coefficient of restitution between the balls is also $e$.  The centre of the second ball attains a height $h$ above the ground. Given that $R=0.2$, $r=0.05$, $H=1.8$, $h=4.5$ and $e=\frac23$, determine the value of $M/m$.
  \end{questionparts}
Solution source
\begin{questionparts}
The ball will hit the ground after falling a distance $H$. If $V$ is the speed it hits the ground with then.

\begin{align*}
&& v^2 &= u^2 + 2as \\
\Rightarrow && V^2 &= 2gH \\
\end{align*}

It will rebound with speed $eV$, and travel a distance H', where

\begin{align*}
&& v^2 &= u^2 + 2as \\
&& 0^2 &= (eV)^2 -2g H' \\
&& 0 &= e^2(2gH) - 2g H' \\
\Rightarrow && H' &= e^2 H
\end{align*}

Therefore the centre will reach a point $R+He^2$ above the ground.

\item The story for first ball (before it collides with the second ball) will be exactly the same, ie it rebounds with speed $eV$. 

For the second ball, it will also have fallen a distance $H$ and will be travelling with the same speed $V$. Their speed of approach therefore will be $(1+e)V$, and the speed of separating therefore must be $e(1+e)V$

Given the centre of the second ball reaches a height of $h$ (from a position of height) $2R+r$, we must have:

\begin{align*}
&& v^2 &= u^2 + 2as \\
&& 0 &= w^2 - 2g(h - 2R-r) \\
\Rightarrow && w^2 &= 2g(h-2R-r)
\end{align*}


Taking upwards to be positive, then we have:

\begin{center}
    \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.7]
        \def\h{2.75};
        \def\arrowheight{1.5};
        \def\arrowwidth{0.4};
        \def\massa{$M$};
        \def\massb{$m$};
        \def\velocityua{$eV$};
        \def\velocityub{$V$};
        \def\velocityva{$W$};
        \def\velocityvb{$w$};


        \draw (0,0) circle (1);
        \draw (2.5,0) circle (1);

        \draw (8,0) circle (1);
        \draw (10.5,0) circle (1);
        
        
        \node at (1.25, \h) {before collision};
        \node at (9.25, \h) {after collision};

        \draw[dashed] (5.25,-\arrowheight) -- (5.25, \arrowheight);

            \node at (0,0) {\massa};
            \draw[->, thick, red] (-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);
            \node[above, red] at (0, \arrowheight) {\velocityua};
            \node at (2.5,0) {\massb};
            \draw[<-, thick, red] (2.5-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (2.5+\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);  \node[above, red] at (2.5, \arrowheight) {\velocityub};
            \node at (8,0) {\massa};
            \draw[->, thick, red] (8-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (8+\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);  
            \node[red,above] at (8, \arrowheight) {\velocityva};
            \node at (10.5,0 ) {\massb};
            \draw[->, thick, red] (10.5-\arrowwidth, \arrowheight) -- (10.5+\arrowwidth, \arrowheight);  
            \node[red,above] at (10.5, \arrowheight) {\velocityvb};
    \end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}

\begin{align*}
\text{COM}: && MeV + m(-V) &= M(w-e(1+e)V) + mw \\
\Rightarrow && V(Me-m)+e(1+e)MV &= w(M+m) \\
\Rightarrow && w  &= \frac{2Me+e^2M-m}{M+m} V \\
\Rightarrow && w^2 &= \left ( \frac{M/m(2e+e^2)-1}{M/m+1}\right)^2 V^2 \\
\Rightarrow && 2g(h-2R-r) &=  \left ( \frac{M/m(2e+e^2)-1}{M/m+1}\right)^2 2gH \\
\Rightarrow && \left ( \frac{M/m(2e+e^2)-1}{M/m+1}\right)^2 &= \frac{h-2R-r}{H} \\
&&&= \frac{4.5-0.4-0.05}{1.8} \\
&&&= \frac{9}{4} \\
\Rightarrow &&  \frac{M/m(\frac43+\frac49)-1}{M/m+1} &= \frac32 \\
\Rightarrow && \frac{16}9M/m-1 &= \frac32 M/m+\frac32 \\
\Rightarrow && \frac{5}{18}M/m &= \frac{5}{2} \\
\Rightarrow && M/m &= 9
\end{align*}

\end{questionparts}