Problems

Filters
Clear Filters
2025 Paper 2 Q11
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

  1. By considering the sum of a geometric series, or otherwise, show that \[\sum_{r=1}^{\infty} rx^{r-1} = \frac{1}{(1-x)^2} \quad \text{for } |x| < 1.\]
  2. Ali plays a game with a fair \(2k\)-sided die. He rolls the die until the first \(2k\) appears. Ali wins if all the numbers he rolls are even.
    1. Find the probability that Ali wins the game. If Ali wins the game, he earns £1 for each roll, including the final one. If he loses, he earns nothing.
    2. Find Ali's expected earnings from playing the game.
  3. Find a simplified expression for \[1 + 2\binom{n}{1}x + 3\binom{n}{2}x^2 + \ldots + (n+1)x^n,\] where \(n\) is a positive integer.
  4. Zen plays a different game with a fair \(2k\)-sided die. She rolls the die until the first \(2k\) appears, and wins if the numbers rolled are strictly increasing in size. For example, if \(k = 3\), she wins if she rolls 2, 6 or 1, 4, 5, 6, but not if she rolls 1, 4, 2, 6 or 1, 3, 3, 6. If Zen wins the game, she earns £1 for each roll, including the final one. If she loses, she earns nothing. Find Zen's expected earnings from playing the game.
  5. Using the approximation \[\left(1 + \frac{1}{n}\right)^n \approx e \quad \text{for large } n,\] show that, when \(k\) is large, Zen's expected earnings are a little over 35\% more than Ali's expected earnings.


Solution:

  1. Note that, \begin{align*} && \sum_{r = 0}^\infty x^r &= \frac{1}{1-x} && |x| < 1\\ \underbrace{\Rightarrow}_{\frac{\d}{\d x}} && \sum_{r = 0}^\infty rx^{r-1} &= \frac{1}{(1-x)^2} && |x| < 1\\ && \sum_{r = 1}^\infty rx^{r-1} &= \frac{1}{(1-x)^2} && |x| < 1\\ \end{align*}
    1. \begin{align*} && \mathbb{P}(\text{Ali wins in }s\text{ rounds}) &= \left ( \frac{k-1}{2k} \right)^{s-1} \frac{1}{2k} \\ \Rightarrow && \mathbb{P}(\text{Ali wins}) &= \sum_{s=1}^\infty \mathbb{P}(\text{Ali wins in }s\text{ rounds}) \\ &&&=\sum_{s=1}^\infty \left ( \frac{k-1}{2k} \right)^{s-1} \frac{1}{2k} \\ &&&= \frac{1}{2k} \sum_{s=0}^\infty \left ( \frac{k-1}{2k} \right)^{s} \\ &&&= \frac{1}{2k} \frac{1}{1 - \frac{k-1}{2k}} \\ &&&= \frac{1}{2k - (k-1)} \\ &&&= \frac{1}{k+1} \end{align*}
    2. \begin{align*} \mathbb{E}(\text{Ali score}) &= \sum_{s=1}^{\infty} s \mathbb{P}(\text{Ali wins in }s\text{ rounds}) \\ &= \sum_{s=1}^{\infty} s \left ( \frac{k-1}{2k} \right)^{s-1} \frac{1}{2k} \\ &= \frac{1}{2k} \frac{1}{\left (1 - \frac{k-1}{2k} \right)^2} \\ &= \frac{2k}{(k+1)^2} \end{align*}
  2. \begin{align*} && (1+x)^{n} &= \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} x^k \\ \Rightarrow && x(1+x)^n &= \sum_{k=0}^n \binom{n}{k} x^{k+1} \\ \Rightarrow && (1+x)^n + nx(1+x)^{n-1} &= \sum_{k=0}^n (k+1)\binom{n}{k} x^k \\ \Rightarrow && (1+x)^{n-1}(1+(n+1)x) &= 1 + 2\binom{n}{1}x + 3\binom{n}{2}x^2 + \ldots + (n+1)x^n \end{align*}
  3. \begin{align*} \mathbb{E}(\text{Zen score}) &= \sum_{s=1}^{2k} s \mathbb{P} \left ( \text{Zen gets }s\text{ numbers in increasing order ending with }2k \right) \\ &= \sum_{s=1}^{2k} s \binom{2k-1}{s-1} \frac{1}{(2k)^s} \\ &= \frac{1}{2k}\sum_{s=0}^{2k-1} (s+1) \binom{2k-1}{s} \frac{1}{(2k)^s} \\ &= \frac{1}{2k} \left ( 1 + \frac{1}{2k} \right)^{2k-2} \left ( 1 + (2k-1+1) \frac{1}{2k} \right) \\ &= \frac{1}{k}\left ( 1 + \frac{1}{2k} \right)^{2k-2} \end{align*}
  4. Therefore as \(k \to \infty\) \begin{align*} \frac{\mathbb{E}(\text{Zen score})}{\mathbb{E}(\text{Ali score}) } &= \frac{1}{k}\left ( 1 + \frac{1}{2k} \right)^{2k-2} \big / \frac{2k}{(k+1)^2} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)^2}{2k^2} \cdot \left ( 1 + \frac{1}{2k} \right)^{2k} \cdot \left ( 1 + \frac{1}{2k} \right)^{-2} \\ &\to \frac12 e \approx 2.7/2 = 1.35 \end{align*} ie Zen's expected earnings are \(\approx 35\%\) more.

2025 Paper 2 Q12
D: 1500.0 B: 1500.0

Let \(X\) be a Poisson random variable with mean \(\lambda\) and let \(p_r = P(X = r)\), for \(r = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\). Neither \(\lambda\) nor \(\lambda + \frac{1}{2} + \sqrt{\lambda + \frac{1}{4}}\) is an integer.

  1. Show, by considering the sequence \(d_r \equiv p_r - p_{r-1}\) for \(r = 1, 2, \ldots\), that there is a unique integer \(m\) such that \(P(X = r) \leq P(X = m)\) for all \(r = 0, 1, 2, \ldots\), and that \[\lambda - 1 < m < \lambda.\]
  2. Show that the minimum value of \(d_r\) occurs at \(r = k\), where \(k\) is such that \[k < \lambda + \frac{1}{2} + \sqrt{\lambda + \frac{1}{4}} < k + 1.\]
  3. Show that the condition for the maximum value of \(d_r\) to occur at \(r = 1\) is \[1 < \lambda < 2 + \sqrt{2}.\]
  4. In the case \(\lambda = 3.36\), sketch a graph of \(p_r\) against \(r\) for \(r = 0, 1, 2, \ldots, 6, 7\).


Solution:

  1. Suppose \(d_r = p_r - p_{r-1}\) then \begin{align*} d_r &= p_r - p_{r-1} \\ &= \mathbb{P}(X = r) - \mathbb{P}(X = r-1) \\ &= e^{-\lambda} \left ( \frac{\lambda^r}{r!} - \frac{\lambda^{r-1}}{(r-1)!} \right) \\ &= e^{-\lambda} \frac{\lambda^{r-1}}{(r-1)!} \left ( \frac{\lambda}{r} - 1\right) \end{align*} Therefore \(d_r > 0 \Leftrightarrow \lambda > r\)ie, \(p_r\) is increasing while \(r < \lambda\) and reaches a (unique) maximum when \(r = \lfloor \lambda \rfloor\).
  2. Let \(dd_r = d_r - d_{r-1}\), so: \begin{align*} dd_r &= d_r - d_{r-1} \\ &= p_r - 2p_{r-1} + p_{r-2} \\ &= e^{-\lambda} \frac{\lambda^{r-2}}{r!} \left ( \lambda^2 - 2 \lambda r + r(r-1)\right ) \end{align*} Therefore \(dd_r < 0 \Leftrightarrow \lambda^2 - 2\lambda r +r(r-1) < 0 \Leftrightarrow r^2 -(1+2\lambda)r + \lambda^2 < 0\), but this has roots \(r = \frac{(1+2\lambda) \pm \sqrt{(1+2\lambda)^2-4\lambda^2}}{2} = \lambda + \frac12 \pm \sqrt{\lambda + \frac14}\). Therefore \(d_r\) is decreasing when \(r \in \left (\lambda + \frac12 -\sqrt{\lambda + \frac14},\lambda + \frac12 + \sqrt{\lambda + \frac14} \right)\), therefore the possible minimums are \(d_1\) and \(d_k\) where \(k < \lambda + \frac{1}{2} + \sqrt{\lambda + \frac{1}{4}} < k + 1\). \(d_1 = e^{-\lambda}(\lambda - 1)\), \(d_k = e^{-\lambda} \frac{\lambda^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}(\frac{\lambda}{k}-1)\)
  3. If the maximum value of \(d_r\) is \(r = 1\) then \(d_r\) must be decreasing, ie considering \(dd_2\) we have \(\lambda^2 -4\lambda + 2< 0 \Leftrightarrow 2 - \sqrt{2} < \lambda < 2 + \sqrt{2}\). It must also be the case that it doesn't get beaten as \(\lambda \to \infty\). In this case \(d_r \to 0\), so we need \(d_1 > 0\), ie \(\lambda > 1\). Therefore \(1 < \lambda < 2 + \sqrt{2}\)
  4. TikZ diagram
    re} \end{center}